Micro 827: The Team Odds - Game Over

[BNL]

VC 1.7

Performer (2): Dunnstral, Skygazer
Dunnstral (2): schadd_, Eragon
Eragon (2): Wh4t, northsidegal
Carcalilly (1): Performer
Skygazer (1): RadiantCowbells
Wh4t (1): Carcalilly

Not Voting (0) -

The deadline is 30 September 7pm UTC-4, or in (expired on 2018-09-30 19:00:00)

Mod Notes:

[RadiantCowbells]

i didn't say you were bad i said you were being bad

but sure

[RadiantCowbells]

unfortunately I can't take the risk on an eragon vote right now.

[RadiantCowbells]

I don't even want to case Skygazer because I don't want to give away the reasons for my vote there.

[Carcalilly]

r u hiding something rc

[Wh4t]

@NSG I'm talking about 128 and 142.

[Wh4t]

hey whatty do you know how basic that vote was

The vote tags only work in one format...should I rainbow colour it next time?

Oh no, I mean how predictable it is to vote someone with high odds right off the bat. It's not scummy but that's what I meant.

I know I was trolling lol. I don't even get how the odds work.

[northsidegal]

@NSG I'm talking about 128 and 142.

most of those posts seem to me like pointing out the obvious / just stating facts

granted, eragon's questions warranted those responses, but i don't think they're reasons to townread her

[schadd_]

hi nsg :)!!!!

[northsidegal]

hello

[RadiantCowbells]

hi

[Skygazer]

hello?

[Carcalilly]

schadd what's ur role

[RadiantCowbells]

hi sky

[northsidegal]

what are all these wolfy pop ins

[Wh4t]

@NSG I'm talking about 128 and 142.

most of those posts seem to me like pointing out the obvious / just stating facts

granted, eragon's questions warranted those responses, but i don't think they're reasons to townread her

From what Im familiar with it seems towny. How familiar are you with her meta?

[Wh4t]

RC I'd like to hear your thoughts on Sky other than the mathematical read.

[RadiantCowbells]

she's scum

[northsidegal]

From what Im familiar with it seems towny. How familiar are you with her meta?

not very, but i'm interested to hear more

are you saying that statements like that don't happen in sky's scumgame? if that's the case, what exactly

is

sky's scumgame like? i'm not trying to come off as rude here, but those statements were really just plain responses to questions. i can't imagine how that kind of thing wouldn't ever be present in someone's scumgame or couldn't be faked as scum, although i'm willing to entertain the thought if you have examples to give / something to elaborate on.

[RadiantCowbells]

ahem

nsg r scums

[schadd_]

ive been busy all of today and will continue today and will prob b busy most of tmrw

no problem with eventually lynching sky if rc doesnt change that but wanna keep doing the day

just wanted to pop in n say hi to northsidegal : )

[schadd_]

i already claimed

[schadd_]

ok wait i can do a little bit of content

wh4t (?) said something like "schadd has done reaction testing but hasnt taken stances" but i contend that i have done like no actual reaction tests and have taken several stances

performer said something like "

• were willing to townread me so they are probably town and i was like haha what? prob town idk
  
  thats all i remmber

[Wh4t]

are you saying that statements like that don't happen in sky's scumgame?

I think it would be unusual for scum to things like "why are you surface reading x's post when the intent is clear"

No further comment at this stage.

[Wh4t]

wh4t (?) said something like "schadd has done reaction testing but hasnt taken stances" but i contend that i have done like no actual reaction tests and have taken several stances

You have two stances.

1. Dunnstral 5 posted so is scum
2. You like saying hi to NSG

Did I miss anything out?

You seem flip floppy on sky, what's your read there?