This is my role.
I swear that ya'' are missing the obvious on purpose just to annoy me......
I swear that ya'' are missing the obvious on purpose just to annoy me......
EBWOPIn post 1950, NicoRobin wrote:@Gamma Emerald
This is my role.
I swear that ya'll are missing the obvious on purpose just to annoy me......>.>
Extremely restrictive post restrictions are bad because they disenfranchise players from the game.In post 1943, Vecna wrote:Ignore the cross-post part I guess? How does it being optional make sense in light of your big post though? Doesnt invalidate any of the parts that you mentioned to try and get me lynched.
So if I'm reading this right and you're a triplevoter who can't change their targets when they vote three times... why would you blow it right at the start of the day?In post 1950, NicoRobin wrote:@Gamma Emerald
This is my role.
I swear that ya'' are missing the obvious on purpose just to annoy me......
TFW the mod mod-confirms that your role was meant as a troll role and was never designed to actually have utility in the game.In post 1905, RadiantCowbells wrote:So this game was actually heavily flavour driven in its development and I... didn't write a no lynch flavor.
Ginngie is town because her posts screamed town. Three posts may not be enough when Ginngie is playing normally, but with Ginngie playing the way she is this game, I'd have only needed one for the read.In post 1942, Vecna wrote:Mastina/Ginngie - can either or both of you please elaborate why it is ok with both of you that Mastina has this strong of a read on Ginngie while the latter pretty much had like 3 posts when the read was formulated? Why isnt ginngie somewhat suspicious about how easy it went, especially considering Ginngie is playing a whole different type of game here than she usually is, and has way lower activity levels. What in those little posts was enough to get that strong a read that allowed the read to be above towncleared Vax?
Chickadee, of course.In post 1914, Nero Cain wrote:Who is scum gin?
I'm taking Organic Chemistry and Physics both with labs at the same timeIn post 1942, Vecna wrote:, and has way lower activity levels.
Can you be a bit more specific as to what it is in ginngie's play that screams town as u put it? What are the indicators? Because these type of statements can be made at any time about any personIn post 1956, mastina wrote:TFW the mod mod-confirms that your role was meant as a troll role and was never designed to actually have utility in the game.In post 1905, RadiantCowbells wrote:So this game was actually heavily flavour driven in its development and I... didn't write a no lynch flavor.
Ginngie is town because her posts screamed town. Three posts may not be enough when Ginngie is playing normally, but with Ginngie playing the way she is this game, I'd have only needed one for the read.In post 1942, Vecna wrote:Mastina/Ginngie - can either or both of you please elaborate why it is ok with both of you that Mastina has this strong of a read on Ginngie while the latter pretty much had like 3 posts when the read was formulated? Why isnt ginngie somewhat suspicious about how easy it went, especially considering Ginngie is playing a whole different type of game here than she usually is, and has way lower activity levels. What in those little posts was enough to get that strong a read that allowed the read to be above towncleared Vax?
So that also answers the second half. It isspecificallythis game is a whole different type of game than normal for her, that I was able to get the read as easily as I did. She has specific alignment indicators which are usually not triggered immediately; this game, she triggered them immediately.because
Chickadee, of course.In post 1914, Nero Cain wrote:Who is scum gin?
VOTE: Chickadee.
Tnx babe, mild suspicions put to restIn post 1952, jjh927 wrote:Extremely restrictive post restrictions are bad because they disenfranchise players from the game.In post 1943, Vecna wrote:Ignore the cross-post part I guess? How does it being optional make sense in light of your big post though? Doesnt invalidate any of the parts that you mentioned to try and get me lynched.
Making it optional but dangling a reward in front of your head makes it far more reasonable for RC to have designed such a role.
The main focus of my push was that you had made up the post restriction, or at least the most restrictive elements of it, because it was too restrictive for RC to have forced upon a player.
In post 1863, Chickadee wrote:That seems breakable to be able to do that every day..but ok
VOTE: Mastina
I volunteer for tomorrow, since you regret not gladiating me Mastina.
In post 1865, Nero Cain wrote:how can she gladiate you if she's dead?In post 1863, Chickadee wrote:VOTE: Mastina
I volunteer for tomorrow, since you regret not gladiating me Mastina.THISgame.
In post 1869, Chickadee wrote:In post 1865, Nero Cain wrote:how can she gladiate you if she's dead?In post 1863, Chickadee wrote:VOTE: Mastina
I volunteer for tomorrow, since you regret not gladiating me Mastina.THISgame.We no lynch.
And idgaf if you guys think it's a scum claim. When the gladiator works I won't hear anything from you guys.
Mastina, if you don't gladiator me tomorrow, I'm taking it as a scum claim from you. I claim to be one of your biggest scum reads, yet you didn't choose me today. You have a chance tomorrow to either clear me or condemn me. Take it and sort me once and for all, or stop pushing me.
In post 1871, Chickadee wrote:Because we need mastina to flip to confirm the results. I have a hard time believing that Mastina's role is unlimited. That's just an immediate public day-cop result. Mastina herself said there are things she wouldn't reveal until later.
Chickadee, explain this.In post 1874, Lady Angel wrote:If you're volunteering for tomorrow, why vote for her?In post 1863, Chickadee wrote:That seems breakable to be able to do that every day..but ok
VOTE: Mastina
I volunteer for tomorrow, since you regret not gladiating me Mastina.
VOTE: No lynch
In post 1921, NicoRobin wrote:Then you should have chosen the first option. This is a punishment because you didn't. :c
???In post 1922, NicoRobin wrote:This goes for everyone else too.
Why?In post 1937, Porkens wrote:Scum scum scumIn post 1935, Titus wrote:@Vecna, Honorable. Seems legit for now. Haven't slept well in about a week. Don't like being mislead but this feels more like the bulletproof vest kinda lie than the fake a guilty kind of lie.
@Nico/Porkens, Clue us in please. Nico are you claiming a guilty check?
idk, I'm a hot mess.In post 1926, Nero Cain wrote:Well I'm p sure that Vecna will be the lynch today until unless he activates his IC. He was on earlier and I was disappointed that he didn't come in here.
I would like to hear some opinions on Ginngie.
lol i guess its staying there cause fuck this on so many levels my dudeIn post 1945, Vecna wrote:VOTE: Nosferatu
This vote can stay here until Nosferatu explains to me why the vote is there to begin with.
I'm siding with nos here.In post 1968, Nosferatu wrote:lol i guess its staying there cause fuck this on so many levels my dudeIn post 1945, Vecna wrote:VOTE: Nosferatu
This vote can stay here until Nosferatu explains to me why the vote is there to begin with.
DittoIn post 1971, Chickadee wrote:Btw no one is getting anything from me until Monday maybe Tuesday. Having a mini meet while as ummer is visiting me. But I’m vaguely following along.