Oh, whoops. I'd still like to hear from Porkens what the line was but I've accepted that that probably isn't happening anytime soon, so there's a chance that Mastina's word is all we have to go off of.In post 3797, jjh927 wrote:In post 3453, mastina wrote:So Nico is lying, and Porkens can back me up here.
I was told, "Nico is demanding your role; you have 48 hours to comply, or she becomes a triple voter for you."
She CAN'T have a result yet. I've allowed it, so she will get one, but she doesn't have one RIGHT NOW.
I'm not voting her though, because I am 100% positive she's just town fakeclaiming. This is PRECISELY the kind of stunt she'd pull.
Also, pizza is delicious.
This is basically how the situation went:
- Nico scumreads Mastina
- Nico talks about it and gets argued against, starts calling the people arguing against her scum
- Nico claims rolecop, promises to scan Mastina
- Nico fakes a guilty and admits it less than a day later, claiming it was a reaction test after Mastina comes back with facts
- Nico gets result and claims tracker, goes back to blaming the people who were arguing with her are scum because they messed with her result somehow??
- Nico claims that she got Rolecop and Tracker confused.... somehow, despite the name of the role having the role in it.
- Nico, after dodging the question a few times, finally paraphrases her role and ability and it turns out she's a watcher too, but still tries to play the victim card
How is any of this even remotely town motivated?
