Maybe Subservience to Protocol isn't tantamount to Solution to Problem ...
"A little bit of yourself goes a long way"
Blue paint strokes of sadness that leave a trace of meaningfulness
Tell me, O Karen,
Do you feel better
After getting your pound of flesh?
Maybe Subservience to Protocol isn't tantamount to Solution to Problem ...
"A little bit of yourself goes a long way"
Blue paint strokes of sadness that leave a trace of meaningfulness
Tell me, O Karen,
Do you feel better
After getting your pound of flesh?
Maybe Subservience to Protocol isn't tantamount to Solution to Problem ...
"A little bit of yourself goes a long way"
Blue paint strokes of sadness that leave a trace of meaningfulness
Tell me, O Karen,
Do you feel better
After getting your pound of flesh?
In post 20, Gamma Emerald wrote:Oi Tazaro, I mentioned sending antagonism, what’s your response?
As fa Mister Shortaru’s question, I dont get what you’re asking about there, buddy
You don't know the difference between scummy & anti-town?
I do know the difference, ya little palooka. It’s just I don’t know what part of the statement you’re askin’ that about, see?
We're falling through space, you and me, clinging to the skin of this tiny little world, and if we let go...That's who I am.
In post 28, KittenLicks wrote:Hi people! This is my first game of GIM. Is the start always this... insane? I'm
entirely
unsure how seriously to take anything that went down in the last page and a bit.
Hello little kitty cat, what brings ya round here? As for what’s been happenin’, this is honestly a tame start compared to some of the more complex iteration of this setup.
We're falling through space, you and me, clinging to the skin of this tiny little world, and if we let go...That's who I am.
In post 20, Gamma Emerald wrote:Oi Tazaro, I mentioned sending antagonism, what’s your response?
As fa Mister Shortaru’s question, I dont get what you’re asking about there, buddy
You don't know the difference between scummy & anti-town?
I do know the difference, ya little palooka. It’s just I don’t know what part of the statement you’re askin’ that about, see?
Do you think Micc is being scummy or anti-town?
Does this post forward a scum win con, or do you just think I'm strange?
In post 14, Gamma Emerald wrote:Also Mister Micc, unfortunately no one had any permission to select the roles they were given. Not sure if I like the antagonism you’re throwing down, see
If it's neither scummy nor anti-town, why do you care?
Does this post forward a scum win con, or do you just think I'm strange?
it's not nearly so negative utility as to be a policy lynch? I can't be bothered to look up the stats, but the odds of an innocent child even existing aren't exactly high.
In post 32, Gamma Emerald wrote:
Hello little kitty cat, what brings ya round here? As for what’s been happenin’, this is honestly a tame start compared to some of the more complex iteration of this setup.
Well, I'm happy it's not a more complex setup then, I guess. My heart can only take so much excitement.
In post 14, Gamma Emerald wrote:Also Mister Micc, unfortunately no one had any permission to select the roles they were given. Not sure if I like the antagonism you’re throwing down, see
If it's neither scummy nor anti-town, why do you care?
Well I took it kinda personal cuz I myself have a negative utility role, see?
We're falling through space, you and me, clinging to the skin of this tiny little world, and if we let go...That's who I am.
In post 14, Gamma Emerald wrote:Also Mister Micc, unfortunately no one had any permission to select the roles they were given. Not sure if I like the antagonism you’re throwing down, see
If it's neither scummy nor anti-town, why do you care?
Well I took it kinda personal cuz I myself have a negative utility role, see?
Is this a #metoo moment?
Does this post forward a scum win con, or do you just think I'm strange?
RE: is Great(er(est))/(Grand) Idea Mafia always this crazy: Yes.
THis one is, as someone else said, rather tame comparatively. much less crazy claim action going on day 1 than I expected.
We aren't lynching the compulsive child killer today, that is a decently verifiable claim, with only 1 innocent child card in the deck, at worst we lose 1 player.
Mod has not confirmed innocent child's innocence, so that was a gambit claim, and therefore the childkiller isn't a *large* threat currently.
if we see an UNCLAIMED innocent child flip, as well as a second flip at night, it goes a decent way to clearing him.