?
-Kor
YES, it was RvS. BOTH posts were RvS, but there's way more info rn than it was at the beginning and that's what makes the difference.In post 146, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde wrote:Spoiler:
Additionally, Carmen's post was made on post #15, which is very clearly still within the bounds of RVS.
If anything, you should be sayingIrrel'spost was scummy, notCarmen's.
Can I answer this later please, I haven't got any strong feelings yet.In post 147, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde wrote:What feels do you have so far, if you don't mind me asking?In post 144, Keyser Söze wrote:(I have good feels so far: not in terms of current tangible reads, but I think nearly everyone who’s been posting will be easier to sort down the line. Well except for Carmen’s single post).
-Kor (to both again)
do I know you?In post 151, LabRat01 wrote:I know that he's not the type to shitpost as town for long
yep, you know my mainIn post 153, Irrelephant11 wrote:do I know you?In post 151, LabRat01 wrote:I know that he's not the type to shitpost as town for long
I'm just saying that it is highly hypocritical of you to allow Carmen to make a joke scum-claim and call it out, only to then allow Irrel to do the exact same thing and just dismiss it as RVS. You either don't call out either, or you call out both. You can't have your cake and eat it here.In post 151, LabRat01 wrote:YES, it was RvS. BOTH posts were RvS, but there's way more info rn than it was at the beginning and that's what makes the difference.In post 146, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde wrote:Spoiler:
Additionally, Carmen's post was made on post #15, which is very clearly still within the bounds of RVS.
If anything, you should be sayingIrrel'spost was scummy, notCarmen's.
I feel you're still putting a bit too much weight to my Carmen read. It was overblown a bit, but it was for the purpose of getting the early push. As long as carmen provides more content than that, I won't care about the read for long.
Irre did post more and I know that he's not the type to shitpost as town for long so I don't really feel the need to push him for sth that I don't even feel would give me much. Both situations are fundamentally different
please say what's unclear to you
Yea, sure. That's fine. Just wanted to see if you had anything you were willing to share.Keyser Söze wrote:Can I answer this later please, I haven't got any strong feelings yet.In post 147, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde wrote:What feels do you have so far, if you don't mind me asking?In post 144, Keyser Söze wrote:(I have good feels so far: not in terms of current tangible reads, but I think nearly everyone who’s been posting will be easier to sort down the line. Well except for Carmen’s single post).
-Kor (to both again)
I'm happy with my posted mild suspicions on (lefty, TW) and good tonal feels (rat).
I feel like I need to sort you D1 - but am appreciating your pro-activeness for now.
Irrelephant11 I don't fully trust yet, but that is not to say I scum read him if that makes sense.
Why didn't you want your first vote to be random?In post 105, Keyser Söze wrote:Those were my page one feels mayn. They're obviously not gonna be killer cases with resounding substance and power.In post 97, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde wrote:however, I don't really see it as the basis for a semi-serious(?) vote
(Please note: I purposefully didn't want my first vote to be random, regardless of how much I believed that player was actually scum)
See, but why would mafia want to make awkward jokes in the first place? Correct me if I'm wrong, but, you are now saying that you are certain Carmen is scum, is that correct?In post 110, LabRat01 wrote:Lol, you’re reading it in a really weird way. You’re assuming that mafia doesn’t make awkward jokes because they’re afraid of outing themselves. That’s obviously not the caseIn post 103, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde wrote:What makes you think that scum would post that in thread though? Why wouldn't they PM Manatee or post it in their PT? What do they have to gain by posting that in the thread? FMPOV, scum wouldn't want to only because then they run the risk of accidentally outing themselves, and that would put town one step closer to winning, (only requiring one more mafia to be sent to hell to win).In post 99, LabRat01 wrote:That was a bullshit read based on my imagination of how a mafia’s reaction to getting a town alignment would look like. Carmen’s post was a joke, but it was written in a safe way, that could come from mafia who wanted to joke about it, but was too stressed to open-wolf right at the beginning of the game.
(by lying and saying that “there was nothing in their RC”, they could give themselves a bit more leeway than if they wrote “lol, it’s really there”)
I could explain it better, but I think manatee wouldn’t really like it
But yes, it is connected to how I see my role card and what I know about the host
This was never meant to be a joke, but after writing the post I realized that it could be misunderstood in a really wrong way. There isn’t anything more to it
Sure, they could have said nothing, but you cannot assume that “being cautious” will stop scum from posting jokes. It’s not that “they will gain anything”, it’s that “they thought it’s fun and they thought that they couldn’t lose anything by just joking around (while taking the necessary safety measures)”. Which I refuted by SRing them
Literally go look at my wiki page, and you can find one, like this one. You can also see me describe my own meta, here, here and here. Read these please, they'll help you sort me better.And yeeeah, I believe you would say that. I would have been totally SRing you in the newb game you and LCpl were in. The tone in your posts was really weird and your arguments tended to miss the point so damn much (at least in the first few pages)…In post 103, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde wrote:I would've done the same thing as Carman in that situation; I'd have jokingly said "No, its not there, it says Mafia however". If you don't believe me on that, the newbie game with LCPL and myself, I jokingly claimed SK at the very start of the game.
Btw, I was supposed to ask you for that in the beginning of the game, but I forgot. Could you link me to a finished scum game of yours? A good one if possible
Ok, but why would you try pushing it then when literally its very clearly a joke?And oh god, have I not said enough that it was not a fully developed read?In post 103, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde wrote:I don't really see RVS jokes as AI, but rather as NAI. It's RVS memes. Sure, Carman saying that is plausible suspicion, however, you aren't really taking into account the RVS aspect of it. Additionally, if that post isn't a joke, then IMO, that makes it incredibly scummy, because I'm seeing it as you're pretty sure that Carmen is actually scum, and that was a slip. What benefit does Carmen (or the scum team) get if they are actually scum, and they do obv!scum early D1? Wouldn't it be better for Carmen tonotdo that then?
Were you expecting me to go all wishy-washy and explain myself in every post that I’m not actually that confident in it? Seriously, even if I wanted to do that, that’s just not how you push people
Jeez, just c’mon, that would be just bad
Unrelated but, like, how are you the top poster, (by about 30 posts) if you are a slow reader? That just doesn't make sense to me.In post 111, LabRat01 wrote:I’m a slow reader, reading 10 pages (especially in a game with a lot of walls) would take me a few hours. Besides, I was rather active on the thread early on, so I would have to be distracting myself all the time, which would make reading that even longer -_-In post 103, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde wrote:Why wouldn't you have time after the game started?In post 100, LabRat01 wrote:What why not?In post 92, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde wrote:Why not?In post 41, LabRat01 wrote:uh, that was connected to the game, but it was pre gameIn post 36, Keyser Söze wrote:WIFOM says you're not scum partners:In post 30, LabRat01 wrote:do it
If not,as partners, it would seem you've made too much of a conscious effort to try to distance eachother (through anti-distance...?)
Playful RVS vote eachother...
You going all about how you dug up their first scum game and read ten whole pages of it as part of meta research...
Creating an awkward dis-connection between you two, which I conclude is: 2xVT or 1 goon-1 VT interactions.
I prob wouldn't have had enough time to read 10 pages of another game after getting the RC even if I tried it
Idk how much time was from day-start to the point when I said that I’ve read the game, but it shouldn’t be more than 0,5-1 hour
That’s just not a thing I’d be able to do
Why TW?
I'm not sure if I should be happy or offended.In post 115, Irrelephant11 wrote:Korina is kinda LAMIST-y as town, at least based on the one game we played together
How would Keyser know that unless he's scum?
I'm reading the self-meta as townie, ngl.In post 133, Irrelephant11 wrote:hmm I could see a left/tw s/s here
pedit: I mean I've only had two scumgames and in one of them we were all lovers (no bussing allowed, really)
but yes, so far that's my scum meta
LolIn post 135, Keyser Söze wrote:That's weird, I've just been handed a note:
"I WILL BE LURKING FOR THE REST OF DAY 1. F**K META!"
- C R E A T U R E
I mean, do you have a reason why I shouldn't suspect that as the team?In post 138, Irrelephant11 wrote:/inb4 the hydra decides keyser/lab/me is the team
What things did I point out and say were AI?In post 162, Irrelephant11 wrote:It was mostly for a reaction, they'd been overreacting to other things and I wanted to see what would happen if I voted them
Not much, so meh, probably still town. I can maybe buy the reason for "intentionally overreacting", even though I disagree that the things pointed out were AI for lab
rat/drj... possible scum partners but only if they planned for early theater from the get go
makes me wish I knew who labrat was to know if that fits her personality but for now it seems less likely
Why?
First off, I don’t think I’d be able to gain much by pushing Irre for his post. I’ve never seen him as scum, but he seems composed enough to be able to shove off SRs like those many times over.In post 164, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde wrote:I'm just saying that it is highly hypocritical of you to allow Carmen to make a joke scum-claim and call it out, only to then allow Irrel to do the exact same thing and just dismiss it as RVS. You either don't call out either, or you call out both. You can't have your cake and eat it here.In post 151, LabRat01 wrote: YES, it was RvS. BOTH posts were RvS, but there's way more info rn than it was at the beginning and that's what makes the difference.
I feel you're still putting a bit too much weight to my Carmen read. It was overblown a bit, but it was for the purpose of getting the early push. As long as carmen provides more content than that, I won't care about the read for long.
Irre did post more and I know that he's not the type to shitpost as town for long so I don't really feel the need to push him for sth that I don't even feel would give me much. Both situations are fundamentally different
please say what's unclear to you
And, no, both situations arenotfundamentally different, both were made in RVS... please explain how rvs and rvs, but later in the game are fundamentally different. I'm just not seeing it.
He wouldn't (obviously) but he has good instincts as townIn post 165, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde wrote:How would Keyser know that unless he's scum?
I mean, I would say "we're the wagon on tw, it would be too bold as scum for us to do this", but it would sound a lot better coming from someone else, u knoIn post 165, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde wrote:I mean, do you have a reason why I shouldn't suspect that as the team?(Even though I think {TW, Lab, Creature} is more reasonable)
Your push on labrat is too much imo and I can't decide if it's more likely to come from scum!you or town!youIn post 165, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde wrote:What things did I point out and say were AI?
Also, Irrel, do I seem like the type of person that would do this as scum, especially when we just finished a game where I described my meta several times?
welcome creature!In post 169, Creature wrote:was I replaced from this game?
Because they suckIn post 165, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde wrote:See, but why would mafia want to make awkward jokes in the first place?
In post 165, Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but, you are now saying that you are certain Carmen is scum, is that correct?
In post 17, LabRat01 wrote:that vote was half-serious
In post 99, LabRat01 wrote:That was a bullshit read based on my imagination
In post 110, LabRat01 wrote: And oh god, have I not said enough that it was not a fully developed read?
Were you expecting me to go all wishy-washy and explain myself in every postSeriously, even if I wanted to do that, that’s just not how you push peoplethat I’m not actually that confident in?
Jeez, c’mon, that would be just bad
In post 142, LabRat01 wrote: The read on Carmen was supposed to both:
-allow me to push my read
and more importantly
-create some content to get us OUT of RvS.
I've reached the goal and I'm satisfied with it, I'm obviously not gonna make a big deal out of a RvS post when I've got stronger stuff to base my reads on
In post 151, LabRat01 wrote: It was overblown a bit, but it was for the purpose of getting the early push. As long as carmen provides more content than that, I won't care about the read for long.