i mean the "quoting the usual suspects and burninating scum" thing was a joke, sorry if it didn't come across that wayIn post 405, LabRat01 wrote:ugh, nvmIn post 401, the worst wrote:I literally have no idea what you're asking me for here LOLIn post 343, LabRat01 wrote:Underhanded, yeeeahIn post 247, the worst wrote:can you rephrase this post because it sounds like you're trying to allocate motive to my posting without wanting to appear too forceful which is filthyyyyIn post 74, LabRat01 wrote:Was the “I wanna try to sort Key as quick as possible” supposed to be an excuse for asking Left to post reads?In post 54, the worst wrote:how do you read Key's entrance to the thread btw? I wanna try and sort him as quickly as possible so I can comfortably resume quoting The Usual Suspects and burninating scum.
No?
but it def feels that way
OR it feels like your question to Lefty was just an excuse to show off your great town motivations.
Which one do you pick?
I don’t like the previous post either (the one I joked about). It’s prob not directly scum motivated, but it feels a really safe and non-personal way of questioning someone.
if you're asking a question please rephrase it as an open question i can actually give a qualitative answer to if you're town FYI, I don't take well to leading questions because they're manipulative and kill conversation in favour of agenda-forcing.
But effective
That was not exactly a question. The way you combined the request for reads with the explanation of why you’re doing it felt off and lamist.
And kinda buddyish/pocketish now that I look at it
Can you comment on that?
if it's in relation to a specific post can you quote that post?
sorry to be difficult but your line of questioning is really jarring with the way I think for some reason
it was the first quote in the post btw
huh maybe that's why people thought i was scum in rvs. note to self, be moar srsbsns in rvs again.