In post 10, Lefty wrote: In post 8, LabRat01 wrote:I'm actually kinda curious if the goons got that in their RCs as well or is it just a one-time thing
Did you double check?
This is pretty crisp + fwiw reads unaligned with Labby (not a big deal bc I'm starting to think maybe I really was wrong on her but also slightly worth noting imo)
In post 19, Lefty wrote:oh so we're pretending derp clears have actual merit or
?
I don’t think anyone should read any of pg 1 as anything but tongue in cheek shitposting
this is an OK take and like something I don't objectively vibe with but also a pretty abrasive take on rvs site meta which I think comes from town marginally more than it comes from scum (scum probably more concerned with tonality here)
In post 32, Lefty wrote:Jesus this site formatting makes phone posting hard
@Soze I’m not sure how serious I should be reading you rn
I buy this for a first reaction to Keyser. Doesn't read unaligned tho
In post 33, Lefty wrote:But based on 28 & 29 in succession I’m assuming somewhat serious?
I like the reevaluation of his own question
In post 39, Lefty wrote:I understood what you meant lol. I figured as much at the time, but then you followed up with Dr. J/Rat spec so I wasn’t sure. I’m not really interested in arguing the merits of it anyway
How are you reading Dr. J and LabRat independently?
Pushing Keyser for reads out of rvs is indeedy +unaligned and reads towny given his vexation with the phase deadlines
In post 43, Lefty wrote:I mean, you already decided they’re not M/M in two pages so why not
This ridicule makes me smile. I like that he's voteparking key as well
In post 47, Lefty wrote: In post 44, the worst wrote: In post 19, Lefty wrote:oh so we're pretending derp clears have actual merit or
?
I don’t think anyone should read any of pg 1 as anything but tongue in cheek shitposting
I mean some sites open day 1 by aggressively shitposting which is v v boring
I often carry some reads out of rvs and reality check them later ;>
I shoulda said *this* pg 1. At least in regards to the responses in the RC talk
Soul reads are real, man. I get it
Cognisance of poor page 1 tonality is wild
Otherwise this is maybe buddying vs. nai I guess
Don't think buddying is only scum indicative so take it how you will
In post 55, Lefty wrote:Likewise. Over there we have our own resident Aussie who is pretty fun (and cranky)
What’s your take on Soze so far? Is the ‘I thought it was just two goons’ and then the break down of DrJ/Rat following that line of thought something you think they’d do/are capable of as scum?
Swings game back to focus (I read wolfier out of us two, wonder if he had me pegged for a keyser scumbuddy)
Obviously thinking heavily about Keyser's alignment which is consistent with him being a legit scumread
In post 58, Lefty wrote: In post 57, the worst wrote:Might need to play a game over there and make sure this isn't my long lost twin!
as far as Keyser goes, he's not someone I would townread off a derpclear or tone or anything like that. He's tonally smoother than silk, even though I haven't seen his scumgame yet I feel like he'd be very capable of something like that.
pedit: either or both!
You should! We're a fun bunch.
I thought the Okapi thing was funny. Generally I think the hitting-the-ground-running approach is a good thing and the thought process afterwards would be some pretty deep leveling (unless I'm assuming wrongly he was considering DrJ/Lab as *the* team - as in just two goons - or just weighing them as partners in general).
But your note is noted.
What would be something you TR them for?
This is towny