this post feels kinda fence-sitty to me, on both bji and clemencyIn post 108, Raya36 wrote:You're rightIn post 99, Sashaddin wrote:I thought bji appeared a lot more scummy to me than ClemencyIn post 93, Raya36 wrote:@sash and reaper
Either of you have any thoughts on the bji/clemency exchange?
Tunneling over a single idea, so soon, appears a lot more scummy than Clemency's posting.
I must also say that I don't take what happens in RVS too seriously either. It's the time of the game when people get to know each other and when rookie scums vote their partner to distance each other
I sort of agree. I think bji might've been genuinely just trying to get us out of rvs plus it did work. But I do see where you're coming from. Could've been scum trying to put some early sus on a towny. Clemency's reaction as I said seemed genuine, I'm just not sure from which alignment. Both could react this way when frustrated imo.
==
garmr maybe town?
==
why does clemency strike you as lynchbait-y?In post 132, Raya36 wrote:-I think his playstyle makes him lynchbaity/easy to mislynch
yeah but he said he doesn't like the town-leading role so i still don't get why he'd purposefully put himself in that positionIn post 132, Raya36 wrote:-bji had a good point about him being a 'chatty opener'. It is possible for scum to open chatty so they can easily get a town leading role and it is possible he was faking reluctancy ot taking this role. This is when I started to hesitate on him being town for sure but alone this is a weak reason to scum read someone.
what's your holistic read on bji?In post 132, Raya36 wrote:Bji:
-Seemed to be putting in a genuine effort to get us out of rvs (town points)
-His 'attack' on clemency was weak but it was good for the start of the game and did bring out some interesting reactions (town points)
-did have a good point about him being a 'chatty opener'
-Like Clemency seemed intent on starting the game. Something scum would likely not do as I explained above. (Town points)
-I also did consider he could've been trying to put some sus on clemency but I'm not convinced this is the case
==
why am i town? why do you think sashaddin is prob town?In post 138, Irrelephant11 wrote:garmr/skitter definitely town
clemency/bji/sashaddin prob town
VOTE: raya
why do you think clemency v bji is tvt?
==
a) why are these reads non-effort?In post 139, bji wrote:Terrible entrance, non effort reads. Scum or worthless town, kill it either way.In post 138, Irrelephant11 wrote:garmr/skitter definitely town
clemency/bji/sashaddin prob town
VOTE: raya
UNVOTE: Clemency
VOTE: Irrelephant11
b) why are you basically proposing a pl on this - 'scum or worthless town', you don't seem to care which it is? (i don't inherently believe that this has to come from scum or worthless town)
==
i wouldn't really call it safe - imo most of those reads hadn't been stated anywhere so he was being original; usually when i hear 'safe readslist' it's because someone's reads conform to thread consensus but that consensus hasn't happened yetIn post 149, bji wrote:I fell justified in calling that a "fairly safe read list", in that it didn't express any opinion that anyone had indicated any likelihood of disagreeing on.
altought reading more i think you're not using it in that sense - you're using 'safe' to mean 'unexplained and can thus be changed easily without being called out on walking back on reasoning', yeah?
i think at least part of this argument might stem from the fact that you haven't played super recently and might not be familiar with the connotation current players associate with the term 'safe reads' - reads that match thread consensus
yeah ok that's what i think upon reading more from you
i don't really think the safe v consensus reads thing means much; it's a difference in terminilony that led to confusion imo
i do think that you calling him 'scum or worthless town' and pushing for a lynch on him feels a little policy-y to me and that i didn't really like
ie this ^^^^^ i don't like that you want to lynch him irregardless of which he isIn post 171, bji wrote:I never stated a read, was quite clear to say that the player was either scum or incompetent town.
==
it's a fight i manage to lose each and every gameIn post 162, bji wrote:I am now completely losing in my fight against walling
==
sorry, was traveling; i shold be around more now besides for weekends (fridays and saturdays)In post 163, Lady Angel wrote:The following players have not posted since the last votecount and will be prodded if they have not posted before the next one, unless they are V/LA: Skitter30 (V/LA)
==
you feel like you're active lurking; you have like no original thoughts
==
i think he has a prickly/confusing playstyle but i don't find most of what he said scummy besides for the pl thing i raised aboveIn post 172, Irrelephant11 wrote:Seems like you only want to approach this game from a "I don't make mistakes, and scum will out themselves by interacting with me" which is honestly *not* an ideal playstyles imo but probably doesn't deserve a scumread on its own
just a little hard to parse what he's actually getting at
i think he's played not-in-recent games so he has slightly different terminiology that is confusing people slightly, but pretty much everything he's said is internally consistent once he's explained it more