In post 620, Irrelephant11 wrote:
Please quote me one or more for each of the following categories:
-Factual observations about the game
Post
245: "This game is definitely the slowest I've played so far.
"
Post
257: The entirety of post 257.
Post
292: "We need the lurkers to come out!!"
Post
295: "bji was voting twice here. Trump was right about voter fraud!
"
Post
378: "1. We haven't heard of the TexdoesHalo slot for the entire game"
Post
594: "The slot is active and won't be mod-killed"
etc.
Irrelephant11 wrote:
-Casual votes based on those observations
Post
291: "I'm with bji on this one. I personally prefer to see that guy lynched than modkilled, per 228. Poor reason to lynch but better than the contrary.
VOTE: TexdoesHalo"
Post
594: "UNVOTE: Persivul
The slot is active and won't be mod-killed, and the guy seems towny for the time I've to catch up."
(NOTE: this post came after my post which you are questioning, so it's not direct evidence for my explanation of my town read of Sash at that time; and it's also not a vote, but an unvote; but I am presenting it because it is consistent with my read of Sash handling his votes pretty casually - which to me means, they don't seem like they have much conviction or are meant to be very convincing to other players)
Irrelephant11 wrote:
-Discussions of game mechanics
Post
226: "Killing the slot gives us one less lynch by putting us in Mylo Day 3 instead of Lylo Day 4. Can someone confirm this? I wanna know if I got it right."
Post
228: The entirety of post 228.
Post
229: The entirety of post 229.
Post
236: The entirety of post 236.
Post
238: The entirety of post 238.
etc.
irrelephant11 wrote:
-Evidence in scum casing other players
Post
99: "I thought bji appeared a lot more scummy to me than Clemency
Tunneling over a single idea, so soon, appears a lot more scummy than Clemency's posting."
(NOTE: this is against me, but I don't think it was an unreasonable way to view the Clemency/bji early exchange)
Post
264: "Before post 56, I was thinking bji to be town-ish, casual and pleasant. At 56 he's building a case on thin air. At the bottom of that post, he says: "I hereby state that Clemency is scum playing a chatty opener." Well it's bji I feel, sense, imagine as a wolf in sheep's clothing, chatting us away."
(NOTE: again against me, but it seems like rational town paranoia)
Post
264: "138 and 139 were equally bad for both protagonists. The discussion between them continues for a some posts and looks like an early SvS to me, engaging a lot but without real force:"
(NOTE: AGAIN against me but he walks back from it a little bit later)
Irrelephant11 wrote:
And then also explain why the first and third of those are town-indicative.
I guess I don't see why scum would bother posting all of that; in my mind I envision a much more evil scum game plan than just making factual observations and discussing game mechanics. But now that I've gone through this exercise I do admit that my initial strong townread was based to some degree on just gut feels about how scum would behave, which is not so convincing after all. Obviously, however, eventually I should consider other positions.
I mean, I need to consider the fact that looking this townie because it evokes such a nonthreatening position could in fact be exactly the scum!Sashaddin game plan.