Excalibur [Endgame]

[Firebringer]

i think i have the highest success rate next to rc in reading u

This post was anger baiting by fire, if you guys didn't catch on

ummmm no.

[DVa]

Because I cant wait until day 4 this game to get mislynched like last time we battled.

are you mei or mercy this game?

[Dunnstral]

But Dunnstral, these people are also not willing to let go of the sword -- so what then?

Then we can't do the plan at all, or else we have to adjust it to whatever they want to do

[Firebringer]

i don't find anything elsa posted to be scummy.
in case anyone was wondering.

Do you find Elsa's posts townie?

not really.

[Elsa Jay]

Because I cant wait until day 4 this game to get mislynched like last time we battled.

are you mei or mercy this game?

The current meta is shite. So screw it, I'll go Pharah.

[DVa]

Well you didn't literally claim scum again so I guess that's a good sign

[Auro]

But Dunnstral, these people are also not willing to let go of the sword -- so what then?

Then we can't do the plan at all, or else we have to adjust it to whatever they want to do

Yeah, it's not likely ALL of them are scum -- so if we leave it to those three, it's equivalent to picking a town leader who's gonna hold the sword, except for UT

[Dunnstral]

i think i have the highest success rate next to rc in reading u

This post was anger baiting by fire, if you guys didn't catch on

ummmm no.

ummmm yes, actually.

These posts in Witch's halloween ball:

The game was to abuse RC's arrogance and attempt to get Short into the last pairing. I feel like maybe if Short plays it right and doesn't replace out it maybe works. I just knew neither Fire nor I were living to endgame in a game where RC is Innocent Child, regardless of either of our alignments tbh.

So I just played to ruin every connective tell in the fucking game. And I did a pretty ok job at it.

Anyway, gg town. I'd love to play scum in a game where I don't have to deal with a dictator who will literally never allow me anywhere near his town block even if I was town.

It's why I was so hoping Short would stick the game out and win so I could shove it in RC's face that I conned him into letting a fucking newbie like Short get past his VAUNTED SCUMHUNTING SKILLS.

How about you start expecting LLD to be a human being then tell me to get over myself.

-RC

Followed up by:

i think i have the highest success rate next to rc in reading u

Is trolling/anger baiting

[DVa]

No, they won't be town leader, they'll be innocent child

It's not the same thing

We don't need a town leader and someone being unclaimed sword-holder will not make them 'town leader' when the reason we let them claim in the first place was them being scummy

and if UT gets the sword the issue self-resolves anyway, so stop worrying about it Auro wtf

[Dunnstral]

Yeah it's just like DVa says, just because someone is confirmed town doesn't mean we should listen to everything they say, good insight there

[Auro]

@DVa: Their holding the sword discards any sword passing strategy town would want to adopt. Say it falls to Varsoon -- what then?

I said "Except UT" in my post.

@Dunn: Except the swordholder singlehandedly forces us to discard certain strategies. They don't need to lead the town in terms of reads. But can lock strategies.

[Elsa Jay]

I'd personally challenge thee wielder if they are shitty enough. You don't get to keep the sword if you hurt the game.

[Auro]

@Elsa: By lynching them?

[DVa]

Elsa what do you think of LLD and UT rn?

[Auro]

Oh nevermind.

[Elsa Jay]

Well they're sword-proof, not lynch proof. So yeah.

[Auro]

I'd personally challenge thee wielder if they are shitty enough. You don't get to keep the sword if you hurt the game.

Why would town vote for potential scum as opposed to an Innocent Child?

[Dunnstral]

But you really think people are going to lynch confirmed town?

[VeridianCleric]

agreed, and even if one doesn't give up the sword it still gives our nobles a protector for us all, if they decide to vig and their not Arthur they die anyhow and are forced to give up the sword so either way should still work for us.

the question then remains if the three are the sword claimants then who does battle today?

[Auro]

I'd personally challenge thee wielder if they are shitty enough. You don't get to keep the sword if you hurt the game.

Why would town vote for potential scum as opposed to an Innocent Child?

Wouldn't*, sorry.
I don't think any reasonable town would vote the IC just because "shitty" lol.

[DVa]

Veridian, who is scum?

[Elsa Jay]

Elsa what do you think of LLD and UT rn?

Lady is just one of those guys I lynch because I dont like the personality sometimes. Like how we lynched BEF for floundering super hard.

I'd personally challenge thee wielder if they are shitty enough. You don't get to keep the sword if you hurt the game.

Why would town vote for potential scum as opposed to an Innocent Child?

Well I don't know. You tell me.

But you really think people are going to lynch confirmed town?

If They are shitty and hurting the game, yes.

[Firebringer]

ummmm yes, actually.

it actually isn't.
and i wrote a huge long post of why, but i don't think its worth getting into.

let me for a second pretend your point has merit: (because really i think you saying i am baiting is gross but maybe we can talk about that somewhere else)

do you think I am scum for "baiting" lld?

[DVa]

Like how we lynched BEF for floundering super hard.

no "we" with me, I wasn't on that wagon

[Auro]

do you think I am scum for "baiting" lld?

I think you get scumpoints for that, yeah.