If it's that misrepresented, town would see through that, no?In post 922, DVa wrote:Auro, Do you really fucking think I'm going to give you more self-meta bullshit to misremember and misrepresent? If you're unable to interpret what I have already said why would I give you more? You haven't earned it.
Prove it or accept that you have either been misrepresenting me or lying.In post 919, Auro wrote:Because you've said it elsewhere, I've read it before.
Auro decided to make up things and attribute to meIn post 927, Varsoon wrote:I'll also be honest that I am not following and have no clue what this meta case between Auro and D.Va even is founded on.
If a widely townread player gladiates a widely scumread player then it is incredibly difficult to separate busses from actual votesIn post 926, Varsoon wrote:@D.VA: I don't see how the cross-gladiate maximizes info versus people just gladiating their biggest scumreads, though.
I don't think town cares, I think only you do, and you're not town so far.In post 925, Auro wrote:I won't interpret, let town do that.
probably in a duel.In post 933, Firebringer wrote:also dva is town and i will fight anyone to the death who says otherwise.
Or you just answer that now. Why are you avoiding it?In post 928, DVa wrote:Prove it or accept that you have either been misrepresenting me or lying.In post 919, Auro wrote:Because you've said it elsewhere, I've read it before.
Exactly. I was just FoSing at the time, weakly, and absolutely ready to take it back after listening to others.In post 935, Varsoon wrote:I guess Auro's been leaning on it but I dunno that he's really pushed that as rationale you're scum, or has he?
Let's say that N townies (out of 12) attempt to get the sword. The odds that Arthur is one of them are N/12. (There are 12 possibilities for Arthur and N of them are going for the sword.)In post 926, Varsoon wrote:@S_S: That'd be the case if Arthur knew he was Arthur, but he doesn't, so if Arthur doesn't attempt to get the sword, his chances are always 0. Since no one knows if they are arthur or not other than Merlin, everyone should try to get sword, right?
And do you expect scum!me to lie about something you said but act like it exists for a bunch of pages, and co-incidentally what scum!Auro fake-remembered from the hypothetical post is something you're avoiding and not denying right now?In post 931, DVa wrote:I don't think town cares, I think only you do, and you're not town so far.In post 925, Auro wrote:I won't interpret, let town do that.
Or do you expect me to believe you have gone into a 1v1 with me for multiple pages but never bothered to find a quote where I say the thing that is the entire basis of your case on me?
It's been a while since you and I have played, my playstyle's changed, and I haven't engaged much yet, so it's acceptable (and understandable) for now.In post 941, Firebringer wrote:something_smart what do u think of my scumread on u
Obviously it would rile someone up if they felt it was untrue, I'm not saying her getting riled up is what made me lean scum on her. It's just that the content, different from what I'd expect town!DVa to say to me.In post 938, Varsoon wrote:I dunno, I'd be kinda riled if you were posting untrue stuff about me.
Varsoon, Something_Smart is correct here. It's a conditional probability.In post 945, Varsoon wrote:@S_S: Still seems like a fallacy though because if arthur doesn't go for the sword then his chances are still 0.
I hate venomIn post 946, Varsoon wrote:@Auro: Ah. Makes sense. That's why it feels venomless to me. It's entirely informed by personal history that you haven't articulated in a way that strikes D.Va down.
even my strongest cases aren't attacking. Remember my fakecase on Egix?