I was puzzled by the hammer, I
**I'm a He, please
I was satisfied he wasn't a town PR. So, either he was scum, or he was lynchbait (as evidenced by the L-1) and needed to go anyway. I was also (necessarily) lynchbait but will likely need to be killed tonight (unless there's a RB), and my flip will conftown Reaper, the other lynchbait. That should make the game solvable.In post 775, Sashaddin wrote:@ Persivul:
I was puzzled by the hammer, Iusuallysee someone announcing "intent" before doing it. Was there a reason for doing it right away?
**I'm a He, please
Oh good that will help my vote analysis if reaper confirms. You should of just crumbed at the start of day 2 then see who would voted you through then announced it.In post 776, Persivul wrote:I was hoping for some more activity and a chance to town it up and avoid this, but after my unannounced hammer on Creature, and with just 4 needed to lynch and 1 vote on me already, I think it's best that I claim. Plus, with the modifier, it was likely to come out anyway.
I'm. I have an innocent on Reaper.Town Loud Cop
I did.In post 779, Garmr wrote: Oh good that will help my vote analysis if reaper confirms. You should of just crumbed at the start of day 2
Would have loved to, but I have to go. I think bji's town and he has a vote on me. With two scum and 4 to lynch, it was too dangerous to leave it like that. On this site, a quickhammer justifies a quicklynch. You were setting up a vote on me, and sash appeared. You two are my scum team, so that seemed like more than coincidence. If I were scum, I would have planned to show up early and try to quicklynch me.then see who would voted you through then announced it.
Not going to lie I was considering between voting you or bji.In post 780, Persivul wrote:I did.In post 779, Garmr wrote: Oh good that will help my vote analysis if reaper confirms. You should of just crumbed at the start of day 2
Would have loved to, but I have to go. I think bji's town and he has a vote on me. With two scum and 4 to lynch, it was too dangerous to leave it like that. On this site, a quickhammer justifies a quicklynch. You were setting up a vote on me, and sash appeared. You two are my scum team, so that seemed like more than coincidence. If I were scum, I would have planned to show up early and try to quicklynch me.then see who would voted you through then announced it.
Anyway, good night!
OK well I think it's good play, so whatever. Creature was definitively town and also recognized by another player who was definitively town as having likely good reads. So I think his reads deserve some attention.In post 774, Garmr wrote: That being said I dislike the position of people being in a rush to sheep creature read an to be creatures conscience it's weird and doesn't have any town motivation. Both bji and Percival are guilty of this somewhat. But bji is somewhat more open about it while Percival is not trying openly portray himself but doing it anyway. I wouldn't do these actions as town or scum because it's poor play. but I don't really see the town motivation behind them while the scum motivation is a excuse to vote someone with out your own reasoning. Bji has his own opinion in there so it's less likely a excuse to vote.
English is not your first language? Could have fooled me!In post 777, Sashaddin wrote:@ bji:
Ah, sorry I messed up your mind about that cop thing, I wasn't soft claiming anything, this was like something I've seen in the movies (good cop-bad cop). I don't have your rhetoric and English is not my first language so I can't have your style.
By that mentality I mean yours.In post 785, Garmr wrote:@persivual
Also that's bullshit reasoning the person who posted after you must be your scum partner wtf is that shit.
@Bji
I trust my own reads over someone else's I have also seen that mentality sheeping others lead to mislynches.
My vote wasn't going to stand, I was just reaction testing you and others. As you saw just a few posts before I said I was willing to call you town lacking further evidence. Just about any explanation for why you picked Sash after quickhammer would have probably satisfied me.In post 780, Persivul wrote:I think bji's town and he has a vote on me. With two scum and 4 to lynch, it was too dangerous to leave it like that.
768 and 770? I'm just reading you saying "Not Reaper". Was that it?In post 780, Persivul wrote:I did.
/confirmedIn post 776, Persivul wrote:I was hoping for some more activity and a chance to town it up and avoid this, but after my unannounced hammer on Creature, and with just 4 needed to lynch and 1 vote on me already, I think it's best that I claim. Plus, with the modifier, it was likely to come out anyway.
I'm. I have an innocent on Reaper.Town Loud Cop
I have never seen a "rule set" on here, but maybe there is one. Someone with more experience could point it out if it exists.In post 791, ReaperOfSouls wrote:As this is my first game other than a newbie one. Rule set? Where can I find it?
First, you're paraphrasing to cast shade.In post 785, Garmr wrote:@persivual
Also that's bullshit reasoning the person who posted after you must be your scum partner wtf is that shit.
Maybe if you had sheeped elephant or someone else instead of trusting your own reads, Creature would be alive and scum would be dead.@Bji
I trust my own reads over someone else's I have also seen that mentality sheeping others lead to mislynches.
Because life. Kept telling you that replacing out isn't significantly alignment indicative. I've site flaked twice in my time here, neither was because of scum draws.In post 786, bji wrote:Town loud cop seems like it would be fun to play. Why would two players replace out of it?
AtEIn post 789, Garmr wrote:I'll just sheep then lynch me tomorrow I can't be bothered finding scum if I'm going to be mislynched because of creatures shitty read on me.
Yes. When someone flips cop, it's customary to go back to their first few posts of each new day and look for things like that.
Sitewide rules:In post 791, ReaperOfSouls wrote:As this is my first game other than a newbie one. Rule set? Where can I find it?