Judging by the VC you can tell that scum are in control right now.In post 950, northsidegal wrote:
I go for 48 hours and now I’m the ‘compromise’ lynch?
Now I need to find out who is leading who.
P.EDIT: Why isn’t Springtap voting?
Judging by the VC you can tell that scum are in control right now.In post 950, northsidegal wrote:
this is a pretty towny post, if inaccurateIn post 969, Keyser Söze wrote:And me not having strong reads right now is not scummy. It is a true reflection of me versus the game. It is a tough playerlist.
Take you for example, you were scumming up the game until wagonned and after your little meltdown with RC. And now you’re suddenly “towned”? I don’t buy it. You were probably caught scum, and knew you had to change your focus and now just sheeping RC who everyone knows can push through any wagon. Why can’t my vote be on you? “Voteparking” is a bullshit narrative. You didn’t engage me when I had my vote on you, only now when I’ve been offline for 48hours.
Looking back at the shifting of votes at the time:-
her current scum reads are myself - explicitly from Meme - and then Gamma who was listed as "potentially scummy" all the way back from page 16.In post 983, Keyser Söze wrote:Aster is articulate and cutting with her observations: she hasn’t held back, strutting like a ‘smug’ townie. I think her over confidence in her own sorting makes her shortsighted though: I.e her take on RC and Volxen. If she were to open up in real-time (where tone can be more easierly expressed); and one of her scum reads flips scum, I’ll probably move her up to Nib/RC tier of town.
I don’t think she’s ever the D1 lynch.
In post 752, Aster wrote:'m still feeling neutral about Blackjacks aside from the part that I suspect scum may be pushing against them.
In post 944, Aster wrote:In post 867, AnonymousGhost wrote:
@Aster - so besides pointing out RC's chainsaw defense of Volxen in 751 and reaching an FoS on the both of them... did that post get you any closer to sorting out their alignments?
Besides that? No.
In post 860, AnonymousGhost wrote:tis official 393 is whip cream. lots of words, but when you break it down into a single sentence... not much substance to it.
BlackJack
In post 393, Aster wrote:
Most unfortunately lurking isn't alignment indicative, which makes it hard for me to establish any proper read on them.
Gamma Emerald
In post 393, Aster wrote:
His active lurking while dancing around "my meta has changed" and calling it a town meta (323) does draw my attention as potentially scummy.
Keyzer
In post 393, Aster wrote:
So far Keyser Söze has given me no concrete reasons to think he's town nor reasons to believe he's scum. I'm writing him as "neutral".
Pint
In post 393, Aster wrote:
I am somewhat wary of pinturicchio because of this.
In a nutshell...
BlackJack = null
Gamma = potentially scummy
Keyzer = null
I wouldn’t put your two pushes on the same level...In post 986, Blackjacks wrote:I meant firebringer calling for votes on aster, his early d1 play was pretty similar to ours
yeah maybe she does lack reads with more commitment: I feel like she should have a lean on either me or BJ by now. And posting 4 nullish reads is very / LAMISTY. I still think her case on RC and Volxen was ballsy though (in a against the grind way).In post 987, AnonymousGhost wrote:her current scum reads are myself - explicitly from Meme - and then Gamma who was listed as "potentially scummy" all the way back from page 16.In post 983, Keyser Söze wrote:Aster is articulate and cutting with her observations: she hasn’t held back, strutting like a ‘smug’ townie. I think her over confidence in her own sorting makes her shortsighted though: I.e her take on RC and Volxen. If she were to open up in real-time (where tone can be more easierly expressed); and one of her scum reads flips scum, I’ll probably move her up to Nib/RC tier of town.
I don’t think she’s ever the D1 lynch.
her current reads are basically a bunch of nulls are pretty much the entire player list:
In post 752, Aster wrote:'m still feeling neutral about Blackjacks aside from the part that I suspect scum may be pushing against them.In post 944, Aster wrote:In post 867, AnonymousGhost wrote:
@Aster - so besides pointing out RC's chainsaw defense of Volxen in 751 and reaching an FoS on the both of them... did that post get you any closer to sorting out their alignments?
Besides that? No.In post 860, AnonymousGhost wrote:tis official 393 is whip cream. lots of words, but when you break it down into a single sentence... not much substance to it.
BlackJack
In post 393, Aster wrote:
Most unfortunately lurking isn't alignment indicative, which makes it hard for me to establish any proper read on them.
Gamma Emerald
In post 393, Aster wrote:
His active lurking while dancing around "my meta has changed" and calling it a town meta (323) does draw my attention as potentially scummy.
Keyzer
In post 393, Aster wrote:
So far Keyser Söze has given me no concrete reasons to think he's town nor reasons to believe he's scum. I'm writing him as "neutral".
Pint
In post 393, Aster wrote:
I am somewhat wary of pinturicchio because of this.
In a nutshell...
BlackJack = null
Gamma = potentially scummy
Keyzer = null
I would tIn post 980, Keyser Söze wrote:If I was a cop I would investigate FireBringer tonight)
Since when do we lynch people based on interesting wagonsIn post 961, Blackjacks wrote:Springtrap is like the most boring wagon of all time even if he flips scum
Is this a interesting wagon?
Wait whatIn post 985, Keyser Söze wrote:Firebringer observation was tonal paranoia on his entrance (it was a good point and still stands). I’d need more ‘meat’ than that to lynch him over you. What’s your read on him?
I think you’ll be the hardest slot to sort: you’ve had this nice but nasty (passive aggressive?) tone permeating your interactions, I don’t know how to read it. I think it may be deflective/defensive.In post 993, Firebringer wrote:I would tIn post 980, Keyser Söze wrote:If I was a cop I would investigate FireBringer tonight)