Excalibur [Endgame]

Auro · Post Post #2500 (ISO) » Sun Dec 09, 2018 2:40 am

In post 2498, Kokichi Oma wrote:Not a town response. But lynch fire and I'll think it over

You know I'm not only voting Fire already, I'm trying to ask why on earth people are no lunching...

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #2501 (ISO) » Sun Dec 09, 2018 2:41 am

In post 2492, Auro wrote:
In post 2490, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 2488, Auro wrote:What? No lunching only lets them pick us off one by one through night kills, at least with lunches we could hit scum. O.o
I don't exactly follow your logic here.
Not EVERY DAY dummy. Just for today when we have all this confusion.
So you're thinking scum would take initiative in the next 14 hours if we're all voting to No Lunch? I still don't follow, sorray

They’d have to make a move at night.
It may seem counterintuitive but their kill can say a lot about who is lying and who is telling the truth

Kokichi Oma · Post Post #2502 (ISO) » Sun Dec 09, 2018 2:41 am

Gamma please vote fire. Dont nl. You're better than this

Auro · Post Post #2503 (ISO) » Sun Dec 09, 2018 2:42 am

In post 2501, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 2492, Auro wrote:
In post 2490, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 2488, Auro wrote:What? No lunching only lets them pick us off one by one through night kills, at least with lunches we could hit scum. O.o
I don't exactly follow your logic here.
Not EVERY DAY dummy. Just for today when we have all this confusion.
So you're thinking scum would take initiative in the next 14 hours if we're all voting to No Lunch? I still don't follow, sorray
They’d have to make a move at night.
It may seem counterintuitive but their kill can say a lot about who is lying and who is telling the truth

They have to make a move at night regardless of Fire's lunch. How would keeping Fire now be of any benefit?

Kokichi Oma · Post Post #2504 (ISO) » Sun Dec 09, 2018 2:42 am

We only have 14 hours to lynch. So lynch

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #2505 (ISO) » Sun Dec 09, 2018 2:43 am

In post 2493, Kokichi Oma wrote:JAY DOESNT HAVE SWORD. LYNCH FIRE

So the only other person claiming to have the sword iirc is Maria
Is this who it is?

Kokichi Oma · Post Post #2506 (ISO) » Sun Dec 09, 2018 2:44 am

Yes. Vote fire

Auro · Post Post #2507 (ISO) » Sun Dec 09, 2018 2:44 am

In post 2505, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 2493, Kokichi Oma wrote:JAY DOESNT HAVE SWORD. LYNCH FIRE
So the only other person claiming to have the sword iirc is Maria
Is this who it is?

Yeah, no one's saying Fire has the sword, also Fire looks scummy enough to be worth flipping, what's the problem?

Kokichi Oma · Post Post #2508 (ISO) » Sun Dec 09, 2018 2:45 am

If fire lives hes gonna die the same exact thing tomorrow and we get 0 info from his no flip.

Kokichi Oma · Post Post #2509 (ISO) » Sun Dec 09, 2018 2:45 am

Do not die

Auro · Post Post #2510 (ISO) » Sun Dec 09, 2018 2:46 am

In post 2508, Kokichi Oma wrote:If fire lives hes gonna die the same exact thing tomorrow and we get 0 info from his no flip.

Exactly, the basis for people no lunching him seems to be some "99.99%" townread which I'm not seeing at all.

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #2511 (ISO) » Sun Dec 09, 2018 2:46 am

In post 2503, Auro wrote:
In post 2501, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 2492, Auro wrote:
In post 2490, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 2488, Auro wrote:What? No lunching only lets them pick us off one by one through night kills, at least with lunches we could hit scum. O.o
I don't exactly follow your logic here.
Not EVERY DAY dummy. Just for today when we have all this confusion.
So you're thinking scum would take initiative in the next 14 hours if we're all voting to No Lunch? I still don't follow, sorray
They’d have to make a move at night.
It may seem counterintuitive but their kill can say a lot about who is lying and who is telling the truth
They have to make a move at night regardless of Fire's lunch. How would keeping Fire now be of any benefit?

Because we don’t know anything rn. Scum do, not everything but enough that their decisions can be telling
Moving the white knight and then moving him back is totally acceptable in chess, and I count thus move as similar

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #2512 (ISO) » Sun Dec 09, 2018 2:47 am

In post 2506, Kokichi Oma wrote:Yes. Vote fire

And it took you this long to say this why?

Auro · Post Post #2513 (ISO) » Sun Dec 09, 2018 2:47 am

In post 2511, Gamma Emerald wrote:Because we don’t know anything rn. Scum do, not everything but enough that their decisions can be telling
Moving the white knight and then moving him back is totally acceptable in chess, and I count thus move as similar

We don't know anything, and that's why we lunch and gain flips in the first place, no?
Who's scum, how did they bring about this situation, and what did they move back? Are you saying Fire is certainly town here?

Auro · Post Post #2514 (ISO) » Sun Dec 09, 2018 2:51 am

There's a non-negligible chance that Firebringer gladiates someone after being provoked into it, and the same "He's definitely town! No way we're killing him" logic squirms its way into a no lunch.

Kokichi Oma · Post Post #2515 (ISO) » Sun Dec 09, 2018 3:02 am

In post 2512, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 2506, Kokichi Oma wrote:Yes. Vote fire
And it took you this long to say this why?

I said it earlier. Maybe you missed it

Auro · Post Post #2516 (ISO) » Sun Dec 09, 2018 3:10 am

In post 2515, Kokichi Oma wrote:
In post 2512, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 2506, Kokichi Oma wrote:Yes. Vote fire
And it took you this long to say this why?
I said it earlier. Maybe you missed it

I think he means you saying Jay has the sword *shrug*
What matters is that no one said Fire has the sword, rn

Kokichi Oma · Post Post #2517 (ISO) » Sun Dec 09, 2018 3:13 am

I never said Jay has the sword

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #2518 (ISO) » Sun Dec 09, 2018 3:13 am

In post 2516, Auro wrote:
In post 2515, Kokichi Oma wrote:
In post 2512, Gamma Emerald wrote:
In post 2506, Kokichi Oma wrote:Yes. Vote fire
And it took you this long to say this why?
I said it earlier. Maybe you missed it
I think he means you saying Jay has the sword *shrug*
What matters is that no one said Fire has the sword, rn

He said MARIA has the sword
I’m asking why he kept refusing to state such until now
Also has anyone

actually

cased Fire?

Kokichi Oma · Post Post #2519 (ISO) » Sun Dec 09, 2018 3:15 am

I said Maria had the sword ages ago

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #2520 (ISO) » Sun Dec 09, 2018 3:16 am

Quote it.

Kokichi Oma · Post Post #2521 (ISO) » Sun Dec 09, 2018 3:16 am

Gamma if we no lynch you realize that fire will do the same thing tomorrow right

Gamma Emerald · Post Post #2522 (ISO) » Sun Dec 09, 2018 3:16 am

In post 2521, Kokichi Oma wrote:Gamma if we no lynch you realize that fire will do the same thing tomorrow right

Not if someone gladiators Elsa first

Auro · Post Post #2523 (ISO) » Sun Dec 09, 2018 3:16 am

@Gamma: What's your read on Fire? Town/null/scum?
If null, you should vote for him regardless of a case IMO

Kokichi Oma · Post Post #2524 (ISO) » Sun Dec 09, 2018 3:17 am

In post 2180, Kokichi Oma wrote:Ok Maria has the sword. I wanted to see what everyone's reactions would be. Lynch fire