I don't need the advice, but I appreciate you offering it.In post 260, Kmd4390 wrote:Great, but did you actually take in what I was saying?In post 253, mbaki wrote:This will probably mildly annoy you, but 252 is townie.
If you need an answer, you're interpreting mediocre wrong. It did not live up to my short-term recall of his posts - memory isn't eidetic - but it was not terrible either, hence "meh" or "mediocre". It is not calling his posting mediocre; that is a hard overall scale that is not very relevant. Out of game influences on his posting frequency and quality are not important for this stage of the game.