Yup, which is why I know I need to look this over again.
Are you planning on explaining your L-1 bait?
Looking over the argument between Podoboq and LolWagons again, it just really really doesn't make sense to me. I don't see how we get from "I'd like to see more justification on LolWagons," and Podoboq even offering evidence for
why he thinks LolWagons is town
to this:
In post 239, LolWagons wrote:I think Trekkie is probably town for going after someone most people thought was town but
Podo hopping off his read of me quickly
is a bit disconcerting.
Thus, I understand Podoboq's reactionary vote because LolWagons continuing to push this point is weird. You can maybe call it preparation for a shift in opinion at worst but Podoboq literally
defends
LolWagons by calling out post #208 as being significant.
I don't really like LolWagon's case here and the push seems a little scummy but the fact he doesn't jump on the wagon and all the other vibes I've gotten from LolWagons keep my read town.
In post 275, Trekkie99 wrote:Wow don't know what to make of this. LolWagons has made some pretty good points.
Bad post. I revoke my earlier Trekkie town read.
In post 282, Trekkie99 wrote:I understand you changed your mind about lolwagons not because I said his contributions were lacking but because he took offense to you seeing my point, but I do feel you were a little bit quick to change your mind about him.
This is not great either. I really don't like how Trekkie just sits on the sidelines this whole debate and casually encourages it. This post doesn't really say anything but plant a little bit of doubt about Podoboq without actually committing to anything.
In post 271, Trekkie99 wrote:and your contributions in the exchange between you and Mewtaph are lacking IMO
Why? Could you explain this in more detail?
VOTE: Trekkie
I'm also very curious to hear Mewtaph's thoughts on all of this