he thinks I'm scumIn post 724, skitter30 wrote:why is he objectively wrong on you?
read this in context of my objection pls
he thinks I'm scumIn post 724, skitter30 wrote:why is he objectively wrong on you?
idk, feels weird for you to use that to say his reads are upside downIn post 723, the worst wrote:What's your problem wrt me referring to knowing my own alignment?
I also figure you'll see where I was coming from with Punk Bill but if not lmk
i'm not following what you're trying to say here tbhIn post 725, the worst wrote:he thinks I'm scumIn post 724, skitter30 wrote:why is he objectively wrong on you?
read this in context of my objection pls
HONOUR FAMIn post 728, sheepsaysmeep wrote:dont make a read on her subbing out
please
im not necessarily agreeing or disagreeing with that but i dont want to angleshoot like that
We were talking about why I was finding it difficult to respond any differently to how I was responding and I'm pretty sure I chose those words when I was asking how he expected scum!me to respondIn post 727, skitter30 wrote:i'm not following what you're trying to say here tbhIn post 725, the worst wrote:he thinks I'm scumIn post 724, skitter30 wrote:why is he objectively wrong on you?
read this in context of my objection pls
idkIn post 729, the worst wrote:In retrospect I feel like we were not reaching out to each other very mutually. I feel like you're struggling with a lot of sorting/play choices I've made this game but I'm not sure what you think is coming from scum!me?
fair enoughIn post 728, sheepsaysmeep wrote:dont make a read on her subbing out
please
im not necessarily agreeing or disagreeing with that but i dont want to angleshoot like that
ah ok i think i didn't put it in the broader context correctly, sorryIn post 733, the worst wrote:We were talking about why I was finding it difficult to respond any differently to how I was responding and I'm pretty sure I chose those words when I was asking how he expected scum!me to respondIn post 727, skitter30 wrote:i'm not following what you're trying to say here tbhIn post 725, the worst wrote:he thinks I'm scumIn post 724, skitter30 wrote:why is he objectively wrong on you?
read this in context of my objection pls
like, fmpov I'm always going to absolutely disagree with what he's saying
again i know that 'feeling wrong' isn't very helpful on your end but i don't know how to explain better than that, like better than 'doesn't feel like town!you'In post 734, skitter30 wrote:idkIn post 729, the worst wrote:In retrospect I feel like we were not reaching out to each other very mutually. I feel like you're struggling with a lot of sorting/play choices I've made this game but I'm not sure what you think is coming from scum!me?
not feeling like town!you (ie all the posts that i pulled that i said felt weird)
i know that's not very helpful but that's how i read you, based on how 'not wrong' you feel
like i can't really describe or explain why i think it's scummy. i don't even know if i think it's scummy; more like it feels wrong and i associate wrong!you with you being scum (or like jungle republic)
I'm not really sure where to go with this...? I'll have a re-read of Bill/you but I didn't really get strong town vibes from it on first impressionIn post 734, skitter30 wrote:idkIn post 729, the worst wrote:In retrospect I feel like we were not reaching out to each other very mutually. I feel like you're struggling with a lot of sorting/play choices I've made this game but I'm not sure what you think is coming from scum!me?
not feeling like town!you (ie all the posts that i pulled that i said felt weird)
i know that's not very helpful but that's how i read you, based on how 'not wrong' you feel
like i can't really describe or explain why i think it's scummy. i don't even know if i think it's scummy; more like it feels wrong and i associate wrong!you with you being scum (or like jungle republic)
I'll engage with you post-game about this. The only disappointment for me is you clearly haven't read my comments around your CONTRIBUTIONS to this game -- your replacing out is something I will be treating as NAI.In post 739, northsidegal wrote:The only thing binding me to this game (beyond a general aversion to replacing out) is a strong desire to prove you all wrong, and that isn't healthy, good for the game, and I don't think it would be particularly enjoyable for anyone.
Suffice it to say, if you think me doing this is scum-indicative, you must think very poorly of me as a person and as a mafia player. The thought that I would leave this game, the mod and my scumbuddy behind just because I rolled scum (despite the fact that I made an effort and made it to endgame in TAZ, a game withRCin it) is actually just very insulting.
Last post.
Omg preach, you tell them sheepIn post 728, sheepsaysmeep wrote:dont make a read on her subbing out
please
im not necessarily agreeing or disagreeing with that but i dont want to angleshoot like that
post stack the deck not really, my tone is dead inside most of the time and I've become bolder and more candid as both alignmentsIn post 742, skitter30 wrote:do you still think i can toneread you?
i mean i guess i'll let sheep answer this but i don't think this game looks much like that one at allIn post 740, the worst wrote:ftr I don't think this is a carbon copy of jjh's game, I wanted to talk to sheep but I don't think he'll go too far into it on his own initiative for now anyway so just in case: basically, I want him to check the metric he's using for reading you because you read very different to quite a lot of other analytical wallposty players.
it came to mind firstIn post 745, skitter30 wrote:i mean i guess i'll let sheep answer this but i don't think this game looks much like that one at allIn post 740, the worst wrote:ftr I don't think this is a carbon copy of jjh's game, I wanted to talk to sheep but I don't think he'll go too far into it on his own initiative for now anyway so just in case: basically, I want him to check the metric he's using for reading you because you read very different to quite a lot of other analytical wallposty players.
and i guess i'm a little confused why you picked gerrymandering and not your game
yeah i kinda messed up in stack-the-deck and i'm aware of that. and i'm a little wary now and that's why i'm not like trying ot lead a lynch mob against obv!scum!tw rnIn post 744, the worst wrote:post stack the deck not really, my tone is dead inside most of the time and I've become bolder and more candid as both alignmentsIn post 742, skitter30 wrote:do you still think i can toneread you?
you did come around in stack the deck but I think that was a more content heavy read moreso than tone