Mini Normal 2046: Autumn's Farewell [Endgame]

BrightEyedFish · Post Post #1525 (ISO) » Sat Dec 29, 2018 1:18 am

In post 1523, Creature wrote: Your scumreads are the three potential mislynches

You could basically say this to everyone with the info that we have now.

Creature · Post Post #1526 (ISO) » Sat Dec 29, 2018 1:31 am

What if there were no crumbs at all?

Creature · Post Post #1527 (ISO) » Sat Dec 29, 2018 1:32 am

In post 1525, BrightEyedFish wrote:
In post 1523, Creature wrote: Your scumreads are the three potential mislynches
You could basically say this to everyone with the info that we have now.

Players like Kmd and Varsoon are being massively ignored. While your three scumreads seem to be all the popular lynch options.

Nero Cain · Post Post #1528 (ISO) » Sat Dec 29, 2018 1:38 am

I mean, they aren't. I mentioned them a while ago and noted the lurking. Its just Vork is actively scummy.

Nero Cain · Post Post #1529 (ISO) » Sat Dec 29, 2018 1:39 am

In post 1494, Nero Cain wrote:y r u so low on me Dann?

Creature · Post Post #1530 (ISO) » Sat Dec 29, 2018 1:53 am

In post 1528, Nero Cain wrote:I mean, they aren't. I mentioned them a while ago and noted the lurking. Its just Vork is actively scummy.

What's your opinion on BEF having the three most popular lynch options as his scumreads?

BrightEyedFish · Post Post #1531 (ISO) » Sat Dec 29, 2018 2:16 am

In post 1530, Creature wrote:
In post 1528, Nero Cain wrote:I mean, they aren't. I mentioned them a while ago and noted the lurking. Its just Vork is actively scummy.
What's your opinion on BEF having the three most popular lynch options as his scumreads?

Maybe my SRs are popular because they are right.

Creature · Post Post #1532 (ISO) » Sat Dec 29, 2018 2:50 am

In post 1531, BrightEyedFish wrote:
In post 1530, Creature wrote:
In post 1528, Nero Cain wrote:I mean, they aren't. I mentioned them a while ago and noted the lurking. Its just Vork is actively scummy.
What's your opinion on BEF having the three most popular lynch options as his scumreads?
Maybe my SRs are popular because they are right.

but if you're not then you're doing exactly what most scum would do at this point, like I did at Heroes Wanted and Nero Cain could easily tell that.

BrightEyedFish · Post Post #1533 (ISO) » Sat Dec 29, 2018 2:53 am

In post 1532, Creature wrote:
In post 1531, BrightEyedFish wrote:
In post 1530, Creature wrote:
In post 1528, Nero Cain wrote:I mean, they aren't. I mentioned them a while ago and noted the lurking. Its just Vork is actively scummy.
What's your opinion on BEF having the three most popular lynch options as his scumreads?
Maybe my SRs are popular because they are right.
but if you're not then you're doing exactly what most scum would do at this point, like I did at Heroes Wanted and Nero Cain could easily tell that.

If I played like you then wouldn't we have the same SRs? If not, then why compare my play to yours in a game that didn't even involve me.

BrightEyedFish · Post Post #1534 (ISO) » Sat Dec 29, 2018 2:55 am

Also, check when I joined these wagons and if they were "popular" at the time I voiced my SRs. Honestly, I don't remember if they were popular. I have been SRing mbaki since D1 and I picked up on vork and ddl after we got the rb flip as I searched through his ISO.

Creature · Post Post #1535 (ISO) » Sat Dec 29, 2018 2:57 am

In post 1533, BrightEyedFish wrote:
In post 1532, Creature wrote:
In post 1531, BrightEyedFish wrote:
In post 1530, Creature wrote:
In post 1528, Nero Cain wrote:I mean, they aren't. I mentioned them a while ago and noted the lurking. Its just Vork is actively scummy.
What's your opinion on BEF having the three most popular lynch options as his scumreads?
Maybe my SRs are popular because they are right.
but if you're not then you're doing exactly what most scum would do at this point, like I did at Heroes Wanted and Nero Cain could easily tell that.
If I played like you then wouldn't we have the same SRs? If not, then why compare my play to yours in a game that didn't even involve me.

My point is that consensus scumreading is scummy specially if those consensus are mostly town.

Creature · Post Post #1536 (ISO) » Sat Dec 29, 2018 2:58 am

It's somewhat dumb to think that scum are all among the most popular scumreads.

BrightEyedFish · Post Post #1537 (ISO) » Sat Dec 29, 2018 3:02 am

In post 1536, Creature wrote:It's somewhat dumb to think that scum are all among the most popular scumreads.

No one has a 100% SRing record here. If I had to pick 3 people to be scum at this moment with the information at hand, I would pick those 3. But since I can only vote for 1 tend to go with my top read regardless if it is popular or not.

Now, if another wagon becomes popular I will try to objectively analyse the player and see if I should SR them or not. At this time, no one has presented another player that makes me SR them more than the 3 I already do.

My SRs are basically all tied to rb's D1 ISO. Until I get something that gives me cause to not regard rb's posts then I will use rb's information as my most solid evidence.

Creature · Post Post #1538 (ISO) » Sat Dec 29, 2018 3:04 am

In post 5, rb wrote:wow VOTE: mbaki naked vote scummy imo..

In post 15, rb wrote:wow mbaki wagon so good everyone should join me imo

In post 17, rb wrote:wow im always serious imo

mbaki confirmed scum

Why would this ever be a partner crumb?

Creature · Post Post #1539 (ISO) » Sat Dec 29, 2018 3:05 am

In post 18, Creature wrote:VOTE: rb

In post 20, Vorkuta wrote:Serious votes before a third of the cast reports in.
I like it

VOTE: rb

In post 21, rb wrote:wow found mbaki's partners imo

easy game

Do you think he's crumbing Vork and me as partners?

Creature · Post Post #1540 (ISO) » Sat Dec 29, 2018 3:06 am

In post 87, rb wrote:it's just unfortunate that suka probably isn't town otherwise we'd have a townbloc imo

wow such a shame tbh

Would this ever be a crumb?

BrightEyedFish · Post Post #1541 (ISO) » Sat Dec 29, 2018 3:06 am

In post 1539, Creature wrote: Do you think he's crumbing Vork and me as partners?

No I think he is crumbing vork and DDL as partners.

Creature · Post Post #1542 (ISO) » Sat Dec 29, 2018 3:14 am

In post 1541, BrightEyedFish wrote:he is crumbing DDL

Hmm, this is new

Creature · Post Post #1543 (ISO) » Sat Dec 29, 2018 3:14 am

unless you mean because he was on DDL and Vork all day lol

BrightEyedFish · Post Post #1544 (ISO) » Sat Dec 29, 2018 3:27 am

In post 1542, Creature wrote:
In post 1541, BrightEyedFish wrote:he is crumbing DDL
Hmm, this is new

See Post 1185

Creature · Post Post #1545 (ISO) » Sat Dec 29, 2018 3:53 am

I don't see how it is a crumb and not just one scumread any scum can make on anyone?

BrightEyedFish · Post Post #1546 (ISO) » Sat Dec 29, 2018 3:57 am

In post 1545, Creature wrote:I don't see how it is a crumb and not just one scumread any scum can make on anyone?

Until someone tells us otherwise we should assume Scum nk'd rb. That means rb must have done something that stood out (aka SRing them) to scum and they just didn't realize it was a crumb.

mbaki · Post Post #1547 (ISO) » Sat Dec 29, 2018 4:03 am

Which I've said about 5 times.

Creature · Post Post #1548 (ISO) » Sat Dec 29, 2018 4:04 am

In post 1546, BrightEyedFish wrote:
In post 1545, Creature wrote:I don't see how it is a crumb and not just one scumread any scum can make on anyone?
Until someone tells us otherwise we should assume Scum nk'd rb. That means rb must have done something that stood out (aka SRing them) to scum and they just didn't realize it was a crumb.

You're still arguing it's a crumb though.

Creature · Post Post #1549 (ISO) » Sat Dec 29, 2018 4:05 am

It'd be more effective if we just ignored whatever crumb rb possibly did and just focused on determining why rb was NKed.