I mean...you could and it would help.In post 116, TTTT wrote:like I could try and explain why I like the way you are reading the game
these aren't bad at allIn post 121, CultOfAthena wrote:{CoA}
{Cheeky, PP}
{Ari}
{Chick, Maestro, Tx4} - Null
{Reck, Majiffy}
The role PM point doesn't really have anything to do with reading the game. I was just being snarky I guess.In post 122, TTTT wrote:are you asking if I TR Pengy bc I like how he's reading the game?In post 117, Aristophanes wrote:What a surprise! Does this aid in the townread or is it just a fun note?
if so, yeah it contributes to viewing him more favorably when he sees things in a similar way
nothing specificIn post 124, CultOfAthena wrote:That's an oddly specific callout. Did you have something specific in mind?
no the role PM thing doesn't have anything to do with why I like how he's readingIn post 124, CultOfAthena wrote:I feel like you're conflating a few different things here. Is it that you "like how he's reading the game", or you think he's reading the game similarly to you? Both? I also don't see what him being right about sample role PMs has to do with how you think he's reading the game, or your thoughts being similar.
Why do you scumread Chick?In post 127, TTTT wrote:these aren't bad at allIn post 121, CultOfAthena wrote:{CoA}
{Cheeky, PP}
{Ari}
{Chick, Maestro, Tx4} - Null
{Reck, Majiffy}
Move Chick down to that bottom group
and I'm with you
Is this something you plan on elaborating on?In post 129, TTTT wrote:nothing specificIn post 124, CultOfAthena wrote:That's an oddly specific callout. Did you have something specific in mind?
but I didn't just pull it out of my ass either
for whatever that's worth
when others were like what the hell TTTT you are an idiotIn post 131, CultOfAthena wrote:Why do you scumread Chick?
sure but it's nothing excitingIn post 131, CultOfAthena wrote: Is this something you plan on elaborating on?
I was TRing Cult and CheekyIn post 133, PenguinPower wrote:Oh man...you skipped me.
Most of this playerlist is people I really enjoy.In post 8, PenguinPower wrote:So hyped.
Not entirely sure...
dealIn post 143, CheekyTeeky wrote:I'm down if I get 5% of royalties once it takes a hold on MS.
Is this our new financial motive for 2019? XDIn post 145, PenguinPower wrote:Realize that site administration will take 50% of gross profits to start. Just fyi.
It was very specific for not having anything specific in mind. You called on a player who hasn't said much, and hasn't saidIn post 129, TTTT wrote:nothing specificIn post 124, CultOfAthena wrote:That's an oddly specific callout. Did you have something specific in mind?
but I didn't just pull it out of my ass either
for whatever that's worth
Town reading Majiffy and Reck based on interactions with each other mostly.In post 121, CultOfAthena wrote:Expand on why you townread Majiffy and Reck? I've already gone into why I disagree on Reck, and Majiffy I think is just outright scummy.In post 94, Chickadee wrote:Majiffy, Cheeky, and Reck can all be town in my book.
It was here that I was about to move my vote to Majiffy for the sake of having wagons, and then I remembered that votes don't actually matter right now. Anyways, this is about where I'm at right now:
{CoA}
{Cheeky, PP}
{Ari}
{Chick, Maestro, Tx4} - Null
{Reck, Majiffy}
Hm, I think I should townlean this. I'm not actually sure how reliable of a towntell it is, but my gut tells me that town are more likely to make reads based off of interactions that relate to themselves specifically—like you're doing here—than scum are.In post 132, TTTT wrote:when others were like what the hell TTTT you are an idiotIn post 131, CultOfAthena wrote:Why do you scumread Chick?
she looked to be subtlety throwing shade at me but without committing (40 and 71)
also looks lazy from start till now
Mind being a bit more specific?In post 148, Chickadee wrote:Town reading Majiffy and Reck based on interactions with each other mostly.