I, uh, just decided to take this upon myself and see what happens
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif)
In post 88, Irrelephant11 wrote:tw made a Google poll which was nice of him: https://goo.gl/forms/DLt0aUerS8DUs1sB2
Voting starts now and goes until 72 hours from now!
I feel like for fairness I should say no, but also the point of this is to generate interesting open setups...
!!!coOL!!!!!!In post 11, PenguinPower wrote:I want the Elephant to think I'm cool. I'll mod it.
I'll do thisIn post 10, Irrelephant11 wrote:If I ever modded mafia games, I would offer to mod the winning setup, but alas.
If anyone wants to make that offer, though, I would think that person was very cool!!!
the thing about a town neighborizer in an open setup is that youIn post 13, mith wrote:Rogue Agent WIFOM Variant
2 Mafia Goons (No Factional Kill)
1 Rogue Agent (Mafia Traitor Compulsive-Vigilante)
1 Town Neighborizer
7 Vanilla Town
I am far too lazy to figure out the EV for this. Even if it's just a Named Townie, it's a nightmare. But it's probably not too bad balance-wise.
Yeah, this wasn't a serious suggestion. It's particularly strong in this setup since the Rogue Agent is the only one that can take it out (and ICs in Nightless are way OP). Making it Weak might be interesting. (Or Weak only to Mafia Goons, but the Rogue Agent could be recruited, so that neighbors aren't totally confirmed.) It would throw off the parity though, so you'd need other tweaks.In post 16, northsidegal wrote:the thing about a town neighborizer in an open setup is that youIn post 13, mith wrote:Rogue Agent WIFOM Variant
2 Mafia Goons (No Factional Kill)
1 Rogue Agent (Mafia Traitor Compulsive-Vigilante)
1 Town Neighborizer
7 Vanilla Town
I am far too lazy to figure out the EV for this. Even if it's just a Named Townie, it's a nightmare. But it's probably not too bad balance-wise.knowthat it's town
which i think could be pretty powerful. it essentially becomes both a neighborizer and a friendly neighbor
Why?In post 8, Irrelephant11 wrote:I feel like for fairness I should say no, but also the point of this is to generate interesting open setups...
How about: you can post multiple setups, but either:
- I will find a way for the voting process to balance against your increased likelihood of winning, or
- You pick your fav by the 28th to actually be in the running, and the others will just exist in the world (its own prize, am I right?) w/o winning this challenge
you did all 5 categories and used nearly entirely combination roles omgIn post 21, osieorb18 wrote:Balance is... Lol.