In post 141, SaintAngelDFE wrote: In post 131, L84Dnr wrote: In post 125, SaintAngelDFE wrote: In post 120, xwing wrote:@l8:
i feel like saint's got no original reasoning, mainly pushing what others have stated..
his first vote on hearth was echoing what i thought..
his second vote was on blank (not sure if it technically counted coz of the formatting, but the intent was there), who was inactive/site flaked..
his third vote on roo was echoing what others were saying..
he's not even engaging tried to engage them..
so his votes also feel opportunistic and just wanting a lynch instead of trying to sort..
For the most part I'm trying to figure out how forum mafia works honestly, as stated before I've only really played Town of Salem which is much more fast paced than this, trying to learn as I go. I'm not trying to lead for any lynching based on the fact that I'm not sure how well any scum reading I might be able to pick up would actually be.
Same here. I'm used to a 24 hour day cycle, which is much faster paced. Posting will help you with that.
Right now I have to agree with xwing.
VOTE: SaintAngelDFE
So tell us, what are your reads? On Day 1 they're always weak, so no worries there.
Right now? My reads are that xwing is likely town, he is jumping around a lot and searching from information.
Brass makes me nervous because he is experienced, I'm not sure I'm ready or even able to make an accurate claim on him yet.
The vote on Roo was more or less trying to see if he could have been trying to talk to other mafia before he responded?
But unfortunately the response he gave seemed genuine and not rushed. It was a reach and I should have voiced it.
I don't have too much of a read on Volxen based on similar issues as Brass, however I feel a little more sure that he's town.
Yellow is neutral to me, I'm not picking up on anything going either direction.
DoubtingThomas is talkative and definitely trying to push forward to get information, but he hasn't really pushed for any. I think that's suspicious, but like I said I'm still learning.
My suspects right now are between Volxen and DT.
VOTE: volxen
So you voted for Roo essentially to see how he would react -- you thought he might have collaborated with his scumbuddy in the Mafia PT before responding to you. But then you go on to say that it was "unfortunate" that his response was genuine -- why is this "unfortunate"? If Roo is town and you were incorrectly scumreading him, why would it be "unfortunate" for him to respond in a towny/genuine way? If he is in fact town, wouldn't you want him to do/say something towny to help you get an accurate read of his slot? It sounds like you were expecting him to respond in a scummy way, and were disappointed when that didn't happen.
And others have already asked you about this, but I find your "slip up" here regarding my slot to be concerning. First you said that you were more sure about me being town than Brass. Then you wrote two sentences about why you are suspicious of DT, which was followed by you saying DT and I were your two suspects, followed by you voting for me.
Then when asked about this by other players, you made this post:
In post 163, SaintAngelDFE wrote: In post 142, brassherald wrote: In post 141, SaintAngelDFE wrote: In post 131, L84Dnr wrote: In post 125, SaintAngelDFE wrote: In post 120, xwing wrote:@l8:
i feel like saint's got no original reasoning, mainly pushing what others have stated..
his first vote on hearth was echoing what i thought..
his second vote was on blank (not sure if it technically counted coz of the formatting, but the intent was there), who was inactive/site flaked..
his third vote on roo was echoing what others were saying..
he's not even engaging tried to engage them..
so his votes also feel opportunistic and just wanting a lynch instead of trying to sort..
For the most part I'm trying to figure out how forum mafia works honestly, as stated before I've only really played Town of Salem which is much more fast paced than this, trying to learn as I go. I'm not trying to lead for any lynching based on the fact that I'm not sure how well any scum reading I might be able to pick up would actually be.
Same here. I'm used to a 24 hour day cycle, which is much faster paced. Posting will help you with that.
Right now I have to agree with xwing.
VOTE: SaintAngelDFE
So tell us, what are your reads? On Day 1 they're always weak, so no worries there.
Right now? My reads are that xwing is likely town, he is jumping around a lot and searching from information.
Brass makes me nervous because he is experienced, I'm not sure I'm ready or even able to make an accurate claim on him yet.
The vote on Roo was more or less trying to see if he could have been trying to talk to other mafia before he responded? But unfortunately the response he gave seemed genuine and not rushed. It was a reach and I should have voiced it.
I don't have too much of a read on Volxen based on similar issues as Brass, however I feel a little more sure that he's town.
Yellow is neutral to me, I'm not picking up on anything going either direction.
DoubtingThomas is talkative and definitely trying to push forward to get information, but he hasn't really pushed for any. I think that's suspicious, but like I said I'm still learning.
My suspects right now are between Volxen and DT.
VOTE: volxen
Wait, Volxen you are more sure is town than me, and he's a top suspect?
Your reads don't match your vote, explain ASAP
My bad for the late response to this one - long day at work. I had been typing this in between a couple of meetings and must have honestly gotten mixed up while reading it back through, no real excuse as to why I added Volxen or voted him.
I need to start re-reading what I type, especially if I'm going to try and post while at work apparently. My only "scum read" is on DT honestly, but I'm not completely sure about Yellow or Brass still.
VOTE: DoubtingThomas
And it still isn't clear what you are claiming here. Are you saying that the only mistake you made was listing me as a scumread and voting for me, or are you saying that you didn't mean to mention me AT ALL in your previous post (
141)? As in you didn't mean to say that you found me to be more towny than Brass?
Either way, it's concerning because either (1) you are town and just really, really botched up post
141 and your vote or (2) you are scum and made a legitimate scumslip. If you are town then I have to believe both of the following things:
(1) That even after you wrote two sentences talking about why DT is suspicious to you, and after you talked about how you found me more towny than Brass, you legitimately made a mistake in saying "my suspects are between DT and Volxen" and voting for me rather than DT.
(2) Based on your follow up in post
163, I also have to believe that you legitimately made a mistake in listing TWO different people as scumreads (DT and I) when you supposedly only have DT as a scumread. This makes it less believable. If you had followed up with "Oh, I meant <player X> instead of Volxen" in post
163, that would have at least been more consistent with what you previously wrote in post
141, where it clearly came across like you had two primary scum suspects (because you talked at length about DT but then didn't vote for him).
Basically, in short you wrote:
<explanation as to why you think DT is scum>. "My suspects are DT and Volxen". Vote for Volxen. (after previously listing me as a townread in the same post).
And you claim to have
intended
to wrote:
<explanation as to why you think DT is scum>. "My only suspect is DT". Vote for DT. (with it still being unclear whether you intended to list me as a townread here).
What troubles me about all of this is that if you are scum, everything you are doing is fake, including your reads, so it makes sense that could mess up your reads/vote like this (since it would all be fake anyways if you are scum). If you are town then you really,
really
botched up that entire post (
141) along with your vote. So why is this more likely to be an honest mistake from town!Saint rather than a scumslip from scum!Saint?