Making them talk so people have a chance to catch a slip is one.In post 97, rb wrote:sashaddin what do you think is generally the best way to find scum?
Analyzing how wagons form/dissolve is sometimes useful too.
Making them talk so people have a chance to catch a slip is one.In post 97, rb wrote:sashaddin what do you think is generally the best way to find scum?
That's cool. Who's the most scummy to you now?In post 98, FallenDown wrote:I think the random voting stage is over and everyone is stsring to play.
Right now, it's Flubber. He comes, asks for an L1 and leaves. Not enough for me to vote him, but I don't like his tone. Seems like an evil following other people voting.In post 102, Sashaddin wrote:That's cool. Who's the most scummy to you now?In post 98, FallenDown wrote:I think the random voting stage is over and everyone is stsring to play.
this is america
why?In post 111, BuJaber wrote:I see this game is going to be harder than normal.
Eyes without a face is town.
Because the way I play doesn't jam well with some people here and it is affecting their behavior.In post 112, TTTT wrote:why?In post 111, BuJaber wrote:I see this game is going to be harder than normal.
Eyes without a face is town.
why?
Nobody's posted anything interesting enough that I'm convinced on thisIn post 84, rb wrote:rvs is overIn post 80, ReaperOfSouls wrote:UNVOTE: ClemencyIn post 79, Flubbernugget wrote:Fuck me I completely forgot about this
For forgetting.
VOTE: Flubbernugget
I am NOT saying that Eyes was posting a case that would lead to lynch. This obviously isn't the case. I'm saying Eyes was getting on the Fallen wagon early, for a very minor reason (or no reason, which is the same thing), but if Fallen had reacted badly to early pressure and built up a big wagon then Eyes is already on that wagon before it looks opportunistic.In post 81, Eyes without a face wrote:That and my reasoning obviously does not lead to a lynch, as nobody would ever think "Oh, he's right. They have no avi so let's vote them."
Eliot is voting me for doing something they view as scummy, which could lead to a lynch if others listened to them.
Your vote was silly, but it was NAI to me. Eliot's looked like they're trying top build a wagon on me for real.
I would also note that Clemency had 3 votes on him before I voted, so if I wanted an easy lynch I should have joined his wagon instead, but since I didn't then your argument is clearly silly (see the underlined statement above), and makes Eliot's parroting of it even scummier.
Her.In post 92, Sashaddin wrote:Speaking of Akarin, I almost voted for him last night, because of 25 and 27. I finally didn't and it cost me a prod
Sorry!
Okay. I don't think this makes sense. But, I think you're town anywaysIn post 58, BuJaber wrote:No if it is conceivable that town would do something and scum do it, it's not stupid by scum.
I'm not saying never joke, but joke claims are distracting at best and nefarious at worst. Unfortunately they'll never go away, because town continue to do so. It's stupid because it doesn't move the game forward but it makes other townies forced to think about it and analyze it. It also continues to give scum this out. "Let's make dumb claim jokes because town do it"
So congratulations to whichever one of you is scum. You just assimilated yourself to the majority.
What?In post 71, Eliot Ness wrote:Can we get a response to this, lovebird? If you are town, it would be more likely for you to ask questions about why the claim is more likely to be from scum than how it is stupid.In post 55, Clemency wrote:^In post 53, Lovebird wrote:How is it stupid?In post 39, BuJaber wrote:The claim is stupid if town, it's way more likely to be from scum.
if its stupid as town, wouldnt that make it stupid as scum too?
Truth is, it was just a feeling. I said it to get responses. And, also because early townreads were becoming scumtell for me, so I want to start doing it in towngames too.In post 86, mcqueen wrote:I mean it's just hard for me to pinpoint what exactly makes them towny with so little to go off of.