How is you giving intent going to give us enough time to hear from YellowSnow?I'm giving intent now so we have enough time to hear from YellowSnow
Newbie 1913 - game over!!
Forum rules
- hearthstone1235
-
hearthstone1235 Townie
- hearthstone1235
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 43
- Joined: January 15, 2019
- Roo
-
Roo Goon
- Roo
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 189
- Joined: October 24, 2018
- Location: New York
I think it’s a little unfair to cut off the sentence in the middle there.In post 295, Roo wrote: I'm giving intent now so we have enough time to hear from YellowSnow, and then any time needed for any potential counterclaims/discussion.- hearthstone1235
-
hearthstone1235 Townie
- hearthstone1235
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 43
- Joined: January 15, 2019
Hmm, would like to hear Roo's reply to this.In post 275, YellowSnow wrote:Nope, I haven't had the time for it, you've avoided posting altogether for a good portion of day 1.
What do you think of DT being a little more active during the end, does that change your read on him?saint wrote:Like I said, I definitely have a town lean from Roo, and repeating my possible scum reads; I'm still not trusting DT and I definitely understand the wagon on Yellow, but I am hesitant to vote on him (Putting him at L-1 I believe) andI would like to see more posts explaining some of his behavior like I've been pushed/trying to do.
Why were you hesitant to vote on him?
bold part gives town vibes
Or, He could be scum. Your way of treating Brass's case is not going to help later in the game.saint wrote: Still no confident reads from Brass, but that's likely me being intimidated as a newer player and knowing that if he is town, he could be crucial for us later in the game.
(about saint)brass wrote:but also heavily implying he's scum reading me.
Can you quote the posts that imply that?
(about yellow)L84DNr wrote: I'm worried that he's just really bad at playing town.
Does any of his posts give you that impression?
It is just a little habit to get straight to the point and decrease the amount of walls. I did read the other part of the sentence, so let me ask the same question again.In post 301, Roo wrote:
I think it’s a little unfair to cut off the sentence in the middle there.In post 295, Roo wrote: I'm giving intent now so we have enough time to hear from YellowSnow, and then any time needed for any potential counterclaims/discussion.
How is you giving intent going to give us enough time to:
1. hear from YellowSnow
2. get potential counterclaims/discussion
Sorry if I messed up how I read your sentence grammatically, I'm not that fluent in English- brassherald
-
brassherald Mafia Scum
- brassherald
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4964
- Joined: December 21, 2017
- Location: New York
You did right above it. I feel that's a pretty heavy implication of suspicion
I've only made one good post, and don't you dare accuse me of doing it again.- hearthstone1235
-
hearthstone1235 Townie
- hearthstone1235
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 43
- Joined: January 15, 2019
I don't get why would you give him null/In post 121, Roo wrote: YellowSnow - lots of posts, not a lot of substance. Null/town read. Eyebrow definitely raised at not wanting to lynch the IC on day 1townfor that, instead of null/scum or null.- hearthstone1235
-
hearthstone1235 Townie
- hearthstone1235
- brassherald
-
brassherald Mafia Scum
- brassherald
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4964
- Joined: December 21, 2017
- Location: New York
2 things, first, I cannot find the thread that explained why a misynchh is better than a no lynch. It has to do with when you are in MYLO and LYLO and keeping us at odd numbers and percentage chance for wins with purely random votes for town.
Second, I don't see anything too bad with 295. Intent to hammer is fine at any point in my opinion, if you are confident in your read. And it's not a quickhammer which would be anti town. What are you seeing wrong with it? Maybe a little LAMIST, but I really have to overthink it to find thatI've only made one good post, and don't you dare accuse me of doing it again.- Roo
-
Roo Goon
- Roo
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 189
- Joined: October 24, 2018
- Location: New York
At this point in the game this wasn't a strong read. Null/town seemed fair, null was out just because he was participating so there was some things to go off on. Maybe because of my concern with his IC comment it could have been null/scum but at this point in the game at post 120, either of those options really weren't that far away from each other. As the game progressed my read on him changed to be more likely to be scum.In post 304, hearthstone1235 wrote:
I don't get why would you give him null/In post 121, Roo wrote: YellowSnow - lots of posts, not a lot of substance. Null/town read. Eyebrow definitely raised at not wanting to lynch the IC on day 1townfor that, instead of null/scum or null.
I'm not exactly sure what you want me to respond to here. I will admit, as I said in 122 that I had a couple busy days at work, and only was able to check in about once a day. I think if you look at my ISO that "avoiding posting altogether" is a bit of an overstatement. And I think as the game has progressed I have contributed substantive thoughts to the game. If YellowSnow still disagrees, there really isn't anything I can do about that.In post 302, hearthstone1235 wrote:
Hmm, would like to hear Roo's reply to this.In post 275, YellowSnow wrote:Nope, I haven't had the time for it, you've avoided posting altogether for a good portion of day 1.
No need to apologize, I'm sorry I wasn't clear. By giving intent now I am trying to get YellowSnow to respond to the case against him. I have no problem lynching YellowSnow given the case against him. I'm trying to avoid a hypothetical situation where there is no intent given yet and we just wait around for YellowSnow to answer any of the questions directed towards him. Then someone gives intent with lets just say less than 24 hours left. Maybe YellowSnow would then claim a PR with 4 hours left, and there wouldn't be enough time for a potential counterclaim or discussion, and the end of the day ends in a bit of chaos/confusion.In post 302, hearthstone1235 wrote:
It is just a little habit to get straight to the point and decrease the amount of walls. I did read the other part of the sentence, so let me ask the same question again.In post 301, Roo wrote:
I think it’s a little unfair to cut off the sentence in the middle there.In post 295, Roo wrote: I'm giving intent now so we have enough time to hear from YellowSnow, and then any time needed for any potential counterclaims/discussion.
How is you giving intent going to give us enough time to:
1. hear from YellowSnow
2. get potential counterclaims/discussion
Sorry if I messed up how I read your sentence grammatically, I'm not that fluent in English- L84Dnr
-
L84Dnr Goon
- L84Dnr
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 262
- Joined: January 20, 2019
- the worst
-
the worst Snuggly Duckling
- the worst
- Snuggly Duckling
- Snuggly Duckling
- Posts: 34628
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: pond
-
-
SaintAngelDFE Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 24
- Joined: January 14, 2019
My read on DT has changed, I'm looking at him as closer to null to null/town at this point, I'm definitely liking a bit of his content but still think the wall he posted using self-meta could have been a tell.In post 302, hearthstone1235 wrote:saint wrote:Like I said, I definitely have a town lean from Roo, and repeating my possible scum reads; I'm still not trusting DT and I definitely understand the wagon on Yellow, but I am hesitant to vote on him (Putting him at L-1 I believe) andI would like to see more posts explaining some of his behavior like I've been pushed/trying to do.
What do you think of DT being a little more active during the end, does that change your read on him?
Why were you hesitant to vote on him? bold part gives town vibes
saint wrote:Still no confident reads from Brass, but that's likely me being intimidated as a newer player and knowing that if he is town, he could be crucial for us later in the game.
Or, He could be scum. Your way of treating Brass's case is not going to help later in the game.
As for the vote on yellow - I by bringing up that I could put him at L-1 I was trying to add pressure without saying that I had intent to lynch, I think it's a good lynch but he definitely deserves time to defend himself like I was able to and I'm curious to see how it goes.
On to Brass. I saw another post asking how I would read him if he wasn't the IC. I think if me and brass were assumedly at a similar level of experience with just as many games played I would give him a null/town vibe, if not a little more in favor of town. He has been consistent with his posts, digging for information and doing his best to find as accurate a read as he can. I haven't particularly noticed any scum-tells or the like, so I would like to trust brass until I or someone else notices something significant enough to change my read on him.- hearthstone1235
-
hearthstone1235 Townie
- hearthstone1235
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 43
- Joined: January 15, 2019
Mainly that he seemed to want to push for claims. He asked for a roleclaim before YellowSnow defended himself. Though, I don't think this is a strong case because the deadline is approaching, it is unlikely that YellowSnow will not get lynched today (Which could change depending on his claim though) and because of:In post 306, brassherald wrote: Second, I don't see anything too bad with 295. Intent to hammer is fine at any point in my opinion, if you are confident in your read. And it's not a quickhammer which would be anti town. What are you seeing wrong with it? Maybe a little LAMIST, but I really have to overthink it to find that
Which makes sense.By giving intent now I am trying to get YellowSnow to respond to the case against him. I have no problem lynching YellowSnow given the case against him. I'm trying to avoid a hypothetical situation where there is no intent given yet and we just wait around for YellowSnow to answer any of the questions directed towards him. Then someone gives intent with lets just say less than 24 hours left. Maybe YellowSnow would then claim a PR with 4 hours left, and there wouldn't be enough time for a potential counterclaim or discussion, and the end of the day ends in a bit of chaos/confusion.
I was trying to see your reaction to his post.In post 307, Roo wrote:
I'm not exactly sure what you want me to respond to here. I will admit, as I said in 122 that I had a couple busy days at work, and only was able to check in about once a day. I think if you look at my ISO that "avoiding posting altogether" is a bit of an overstatement. And I think as the game has progressed I have contributed substantive thoughts to the game. If YellowSnow still disagrees, there really isn't anything I can do about that.- YellowSnow
-
YellowSnow Goon
- YellowSnow
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 708
- Joined: December 4, 2018
- the worst
-
the worst Snuggly Duckling
- the worst
- Snuggly Duckling
- Snuggly Duckling
- Posts: 34628
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: pond
Seeking a replacement for DoubtingThomas.-
-
SaintAngelDFE Townie
- Townie
- Townie
- Posts: 24
- Joined: January 14, 2019
Assuming youIn post 312, YellowSnow wrote:I don't care if I'm lynched. I'm pretty sure there is scum on my wagon so town wins either way. I'll get a reads list done tomorrow.AREtown (Which after this post I find it unlikely) please be sure to mention who on your wagon you believe to be scum specifically? This post is not what I would expect from a town player, honestly, especially when it's been stated by 6 people that a lynch on you is in sight.
If the scum are on your wagon that only really narrows it down to two players who aren't suspected. If you're town, why not try to talk yourself down at this point? I am confused.- YellowSnow
-
YellowSnow Goon
- YellowSnow
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 708
- Joined: December 4, 2018
- YellowSnow
-
YellowSnow Goon
- YellowSnow
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 708
- Joined: December 4, 2018
- brassherald
-
brassherald Mafia Scum
- brassherald
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4964
- Joined: December 21, 2017
- Location: New York
This seems off compared to our last game. Didn't you ask me to defend myself against a bad wagon that hadn't even existed?In post 316, YellowSnow wrote:Because I don't defend myself against awful wagons.I've only made one good post, and don't you dare accuse me of doing it again.- brassherald
-
brassherald Mafia Scum
- brassherald
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4964
- Joined: December 21, 2017
- Location: New York
@mod do we get an extension of time to be 48 hours from the replacement in this case, or is that not standard?I've only made one good post, and don't you dare accuse me of doing it again.- Roo
-
Roo Goon
- Roo
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 189
- Joined: October 24, 2018
- Location: New York
- L84Dnr
-
L84Dnr Goon
- L84Dnr
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 262
- Joined: January 20, 2019
This isn't simply anti-town, it's anti-wincon no matter what you are. If you don't play to your wincon then it spoils the game for everybody. There's no fun in lynching a pair of obvscum or outwitting thunderingly stoopid townies. It's like doing those 25 piece puzzles they make for 4 year-olds.In post 312, YellowSnow wrote:I don't care if I'm lynched. I'm pretty sure there is scum on my wagon so town wins either way. I'll get a reads list done tomorrow.- L84Dnr
-
L84Dnr Goon
- L84Dnr
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 262
- Joined: January 20, 2019
- the worst
-
the worst Snuggly Duckling
- the worst
- Snuggly Duckling
- Snuggly Duckling
- Posts: 34628
- Joined: November 7, 2015
- Location: pond
I'm happy to set the phase timer to 48 hours at the time of the replacement.
If majority is reached prior to a replacement, I will find a replacement before night end.- volxen
-
volxen Mafia Scum
- volxen
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 1419
- Joined: August 10, 2018
In post 312, YellowSnow wrote:I don't care if I'm lynched. I'm pretty sure there is scum on my wagon so town wins either way. I'll get a reads list done tomorrow.
You really shouldn't be looking at things like this if you are town. In this setup, town can only afford to have two mislynches, and loses on the third mislynch. So if we mislynch you today, then that's already half of the mislynches we can have.
So if you are town, you should be defending yourself. Do you understand why people are scumreading you? There are several points/questions that have been brought up that you have not addressed. Four people are on your wagon, and Roo has given intent to hammer. Out of these five players, at least three of them are town. So why not try to appeal to and work with the townies on your wagon?
A readlist is fine, but you need to address everything that has been brought up about you.- YellowSnow
-
YellowSnow Goon
- YellowSnow
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 708
- Joined: December 4, 2018
- YellowSnow
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- volxen
- the worst
- L84Dnr
- L84Dnr
- Roo
- brassherald
- brassherald
- YellowSnow
- YellowSnow
- the worst
- YellowSnow
- hearthstone1235
- the worst
- L84Dnr
- Roo
- brassherald
- hearthstone1235
- brassherald
- hearthstone1235
- Roo
- hearthstone1235