BooneyToonz Extravaganza: LAST NIGHT TOMORROW

[PenguinPower]

Pretty sure roles not in the RoleBook/Boon Bank count as variants.

Any role from the RoleBook, 1 from the Boon Bank, and 2 variants/extra Boon Bank roles.

[BrightEyedFish]

Let's consider the likelihood, rather high, that he got a sticky fruit. We already have a strong indication that the scum have a sticky fruit vendor given the events surrounding TLK. So they vended fruit to Elsa last night, protecting him and asceticizing him.

TLK received the fruit from Profii right? Iirc Profii said he didn't send tlk the fruit and was probably redirected.

That would mean there are 2 vendors one of each alignment? Because I don't see scum!stickyvendor sending Profii OR tlk fruit.

[DrewVa]

First I was a bit confused because I thought sticky fruit was also a protective

That aside, I guess I'm still kinda confused about the sticky fruit. Who did profii try to send it to originally?

-d

[BrightEyedFish]

First I was a bit confused because I thought sticky fruit was also a protective

That aside, I guess I'm still kinda confused about the sticky fruit. Who did profii try to send it to originally?

-d

Supposedly profii sent the fruit to the same person he gifted loyal on N1. I don't recall if the loyal person was outed or not.

[profii]

That’s right and they aren’t outed yet

[Nero Cain]

I think I wanna vote Elsa.

[Nancy Drew 39]

NEWS JUST IN


I have the neighborizor

Still want to lynch S_S for not hammering - but I’ll at least re read why I shouldn’t and reconsider

Oh good. *relieved*

[DrewVa]

We switched back to Elsa for the moment.

I still think there's a high chance both SS and Elsa are scum. But as a disloyal rolecop claim, if SS is telling the truth scum might kill him even to avoid the consequences when he flips town despite the mislynch potential later (probably not tho).

Elsa as scum might possibly be a higher value target for the moment. Let's consider the likelihood, rather high, that he got a sticky fruit. We already have a strong indication that the scum have a sticky fruit vendor given the events surrounding TLK. So they vended fruit to Elsa last night, protecting him and asceticizing him.

One of my main concerns here regarding SS was that he emphatically encouraged us to vig Elsa last night; this desire was based on the rolecop claim, but if he was coordinating with the vendor and Elsa it is likely he just wanted us to waste our limited night actions on that slot.

BUT it would also be good to get rid of the fruit, and since Profii has now received the Neighborizor shot there's at least some % chance that SS is actually town. Elsa is probably the more likely red flip. If he's green, then wtf, how does scum have both a sticky fruit vendor and an enchantress? That sounds like bullshit to me.

SS's claim is still kinda garbage, and both of his results tell us almost nothing. Elsa already claimed traitor, Xtoxm was already obviously town. No new info on either of those. Frankly I think if he was town his choices would be better.

I'll talk about it with Nancy some more but for now VOTE: Elsa

-d

Well knowing SS doesn’t have multitask or transfer and still has our loud is a good way to check him but reasonable chance he’s bussing. In any case Elsa green flip=scum!SS 100%.

[UnaBombaH]

I'm thinking S_S and Elsa are both reasonable lynches for today.
Probably one of them is the BEST choice, while the other is still likely better than a poor one.
BUT.
Out of the two of them it feels like Elsa is the one who needs to go first.
I dislike the fact that they didn't end up at the end of the wagon.
If it's a mod-decision to not count the vote-unvote when done inside one post, fine. (I disagree with that as a principle, but it's up to the mod)
But even then, if I were to have been in Elsas shoes, I would've made a post that unvoted EARLIER.
I mean, why not?
Then just revote when it was time.
So if they made a mistake, or if we think the mod made a "mistake", it doesn't matter.
They both shat the bed, but we start with Elsa.

My 2,4 cents.

[UnaBombaH]

They both shat the bed, but we start with Elsa.

This is a reference to Elsa/S_S, not our divine mods.

(Still love you Boonsky and BuDucky! )

[DrewVa]

I'm thinking S_S and Elsa are both reasonable lynches for today.
Probably one of them is the BEST choice, while the other is still likely better than a poor one.
BUT.
Out of the two of them it feels like Elsa is the one who needs to go first.
I dislike the fact that they didn't end up at the end of the wagon.
If it's a mod-decision to not count the vote-unvote when done inside one post, fine. (I disagree with that as a principle, but it's up to the mod)
But even then, if I were to have been in Elsas shoes, I would've made a post that unvoted EARLIER.
I mean, why not?
Then just revote when it was time.
So if they made a mistake, or if we think the mod made a "mistake", it doesn't matter.
They both shat the bed, but we start with Elsa.

My 2,4 cents.

Yeah, I’m not really buying it. I think the vote should be reset. I think Elsa’s vote would have been repositioned, because in what world would this ever be fair to McQueen?

[Creature]

I predict a town loss.

[Something_Smart]

They both shat the bed, but we start with Elsa.

Excuse me Una. I did not shit the bed. I left the shit very carefully and deliberately on the bed, exactly the way I wanted it to be

(Jokes aside, that's serious. Don't conflate what Elsa did with what I did.)

[DrewVa]

I predict a town loss.

Why? If you have info townconfirming Elsa, you need to share it.

[Jingle]

Played suboptimally in a way that ensures you have to be lynched before LYLO? No, that's pretty clearly what you did. Even if you are town, you've tainted your slot irreparably.

Also, DrewVa, why would you have unvoted separately from your your revote? If you assume unvoting and revoting in the same post would work, why not just do that? It seems disingenuous to say you would have played around a problem you wouldn't have anticipated.

BTW, I personally wouldn't update that vote. As a mod I keep track of the post in which someone voted. I don't count revoting the same person as changing that position. I think it's perfectly reasonable.

[PenguinPower]

BTW, I personally wouldn't update that vote. As a mod I keep track of the post in which someone voted. I don't count revoting the same person as changing that position. I think it's perfectly reasonable.

If you count the post the person voted in, would not a higher number post be counted after the preceding posts?

If an unvote occurred, an action of unvoting a player should happen. Just because the next action - voting the same player - occurred in the same post does not nullify the unvote action.

Not reasonable at all imo (especially considering the mechanics of this game), but this can be tabled for after the game.

[UnaBombaH]

(Jokes aside, that's serious. Don't conflate what Elsa did with what I did.)

Oh, don't worry.
I know they are very different kinds of poop.
But yours smells just as bad on that bed, considering every townie should use the toilet.

[UnaBombaH]

What am I doing with my freetime?

[davesaz]

Counting revotes as changing vote position (or not as the case may be) is critically important for plurality lynch, as it re-establishes which tied player takes precedence if there is a tie.
If you aren't counting the revotes in the same post the players need to be informed.
In an open vote game it might be apparent anyway (if VC's happen often enough). It's even worse in a closed vote game to not define what the correct result would be.

[DrewVa]

Played suboptimally in a way that ensures you have to be lynched before LYLO? No, that's pretty clearly what you did. Even if you are town, you've tainted your slot irreparably.

Also, DrewVa, why would you have unvoted separately from your your revote? If you assume unvoting and revoting in the same post would work, why not just do that? It seems disingenuous to say you would have played around a problem you wouldn't have anticipated.

BTW, I personally wouldn't update that vote. As a mod I keep track of the post in which someone voted. I don't count revoting the same person as changing that position. I think it's perfectly reasonable.

I find it hard to believe it didn’t reset the vote and how am I being disingenuous here?

You forget that this isn’t a traditional game with public vote counts, so your clarification really doesn’t apply in this case.

[DrewVa]

BTW, I personally wouldn't update that vote. As a mod I keep track of the post in which someone voted. I don't count revoting the same person as changing that position. I think it's perfectly reasonable.

If you count the post the person voted in, would not a higher number post be counted after the preceding posts?

If an unvote occurred, an action of unvoting a player should happen. Just because the next action - voting the same player - occurred in the same post does not nullify the unvote action.

Not reasonable at all imo (especially considering the mechanics of this game), but this can be tabled for after the game.

+1

Exactly, especially considering we’re referring to an SS mislynch that incorrectly felled another townie. I dislike Jingle calling me “disingenuous” for that as well.

[DrewVa]

What am I doing with my freetime?

[davesaz]

I think Elsa is trying to use this as an excuse. Either way Boon would be caught in a tough spot by the question as almost any answer other than "not saying" confirms someone's alignment.

[DrewVa]

Counting revotes as changing vote position (or not as the case may be) is critically important for plurality lynch, as it re-establishes which tied player takes precedence if there is a tie.
If you aren't counting the revotes in the same post the players need to be informed.
In an open vote game it might be apparent anyway (if VC's happen often enough). It's even worse in a closed vote game to not define what the correct result would be.

Exactly, Jingle’s post is pinging me a bit.

If Elsa flips red, I will be looking harder at that slot.

[Creature]

I predict a town loss.

Why? If you have info townconfirming Elsa, you need to share it.

My disloyal failed on her