yeah no shitIn post 968, Allomancer wrote:I don't understand this at all so I'm just gonna ignore it unless I can get an unbiased tl;dr. 960 was so biased as to be useless.
I'm on to him
He said my sum meta was worse than dunn's scum meta even though I have only one recent game on here where I fleeced most of the town, then when I asked him how he came to the conclusion he started spouting out shit like this and it took him a solid 5-6 posts to stop deflecting and just answer the question. When he did, he basically said that since I only had one game that there wasn't enough info on me and so apparently that makes his statement true. That's like saying 5>x because we don't know x.
The statement was bad and pinged me, the way he has completely undercut me while I tried to pursue it (diplomatically at first) by calling my line of questioning a hissy fit and pegging me further down on the list is what tanked my read on him.