how do things look now?In post 361, BlurryX wrote:Antitown for sure. Antitown != scum though. Also, no intention for me to hammer as of yet. We will see how it looks in 24 hours.
@yellow
do you have other scumreads that are not based on activity?
how do things look now?In post 361, BlurryX wrote:Antitown for sure. Antitown != scum though. Also, no intention for me to hammer as of yet. We will see how it looks in 24 hours.
I'm definitely with Brass on questioning this one, as a semi-experienced player you would know how that works better than most of us, excluding Brass. A mislynch confirms a townie, it reduces the number of claims and can make it easier to locate scum merely by decreasing number of unconfirmed.In post 392, YellowSnow wrote:In this case I disagree on a lynch being better than a no lynch. I think we are narrowing down who the scum are and can afford one no lynch and I can be a valuable player.
A bit odd that both the SE's and the IC made it through the night. I had expected scum to take out one of the more seasoned players.In post 417, xwing wrote:im surprised with the hearth NK..i would think it was a lucky shot..
I'm going to re-read through Hearth's ISO again as well, as I want to know if his nightkill was to generate WIFOM or if it was because scum deduced that he was the doctor (or at least a town power role in general).In post 421, brassherald wrote:So, my NKA says, killing on the wagon means that scum was likely off the wagon yesterday... Unless somehow Hearthstone let slip that he was Dr. I don't see any crumbing in his ISO now that I look for it, but my rule of thumb right now is that I should likely reevaluate my reads unless someone finds something.
If anyone sees anything that hints at hearth being Doctor in his ISO let me know.