Mini 2059: Secrets of the Anuket Topaz [Over]

Ankamius · Post Post #75 (ISO) » Sun Feb 24, 2019 5:22 am

In post 73, Brigitte wrote:
In post 66, Ankamius wrote:Hi reck!
Hello ankamius. Would you care for some ice cream in exchange for a vote?

im good thanks

Brigitte · Post Post #76 (ISO) » Sun Feb 24, 2019 5:23 am

How can I trust you to be good? Did you swear an oath to protect the innocent?

Ankamius · Post Post #77 (ISO) » Sun Feb 24, 2019 5:24 am

no I swore an oath to feed on the innocent

oh wait

Ankamius · Post Post #78 (ISO) » Sun Feb 24, 2019 5:25 am

im questioning myself now thanks

Brigitte · Post Post #79 (ISO) » Sun Feb 24, 2019 5:27 am

Ankamius true form:

Spoiler: Don't go near

Enter · Post Post #80 (ISO) » Sun Feb 24, 2019 5:44 am

Skitter's prolly town.

xRECKONERx · Post Post #81 (ISO) » Sun Feb 24, 2019 5:47 am

In post 31, Enter wrote:
In post 30, Brigitte wrote:
In post 29, Enter wrote:
In post 24, Brigitte wrote:I plead the fifth.
It doesn't matter, I don't think I've ever played with you before. How interested are you in lynching reckoner?
None at all right now.

I don't think he has generated anything of AI quality yet.
That doesn't make you think things? We're already on the second page and there is no AI content coming from his slot. Seems a bit interesting, doesn't it?

wowee tryhard much

i made two posts during RVS and then you and brigette spamposted all the way to page two and you come in hot with WOW HUH ISN'T IT FUNNY WE'RE ON PAGE TWO AND HIS SLOT HASN'T POSTED ANYTHING AI YET

meanwhile, flubbernugget/ankamius/chara/nimueh/lady angel hadn't posted yet and skitter only had one post. where's your hot & heavy questioning of their AI content

xRECKONERx · Post Post #82 (ISO) » Sun Feb 24, 2019 5:49 am

In post 70, skitter30 wrote:and honestly i guess i'm a little confused how he's your strongest/only townread after you said you thought there was no ai content from the slot

ding ding ding skitter is a winner

VOTE: enter

Brigitte · Post Post #83 (ISO) » Sun Feb 24, 2019 5:55 am

Enter pretty much said that your vote switch was town indicative. Which I disagree with, but he was pointing out my reasoning on your posts being for joke posting was the reason for vote switch, not that it was lacking in AI.

Enter · Post Post #84 (ISO) » Sun Feb 24, 2019 5:56 am

It's cool. Any wagon > no wagon let's get out of RVS

Enter · Post Post #85 (ISO) » Sun Feb 24, 2019 5:57 am

I'll answer questions when I'm not on my phone anymore but at least half the ones asked to me have been answered

Brigitte · Post Post #86 (ISO) » Sun Feb 24, 2019 5:57 am

It's not cool to vote my townreads on bad reasoning!

Brigitte · Post Post #87 (ISO) » Sun Feb 24, 2019 5:59 am

I still have no read on reckoner. Do you think reckoner is still town for those posts Enter? Frankly I don't think he really read the last few pages and skimmed the thread like he did in the opening posts when he voted.

Enter · Post Post #88 (ISO) » Sun Feb 24, 2019 6:03 am

In post 87, Brigitte wrote:I still have no read on reckoner. Do you think reckoner is still town for those posts Enter? Frankly I don't think he really read the last few pages and skimmed the thread like he did in the opening posts when he voted.

That's fair. I'd agree it's pretty apparent he's not paying a whole lot of attention rn, his vote seems a little opportunistic, but he's still like null town, because vote switching draws attention, making serious votes draw attention, and both can at least spark the way to serious discussion and pace the way out of RVS which is usually p town indicative, IMO.

skitter30 · Post Post #89 (ISO) » Sun Feb 24, 2019 6:04 am

In post 83, Brigitte wrote:Enter pretty much said that your vote switch was town indicative.
Which I disagree with, but he was pointing out my reasoning on your posts being for joke posting was the reason for vote switch, not that it was lacking in AI.

but he started off saying reck hadn't done anything ai and made that sound like a negative thing ....

ngl i think he might be buddying you

actually reading this again i dont' know what you're trying to say with the bolded

skitter30 · Post Post #90 (ISO) » Sun Feb 24, 2019 6:05 am

In post 80, Enter wrote:Skitter's prolly town.

why

skitter30 · Post Post #91 (ISO) » Sun Feb 24, 2019 6:05 am

In post 86, Brigitte wrote:It's not cool to vote my townreads on bad reasoning!

why is he a townread

Enter · Post Post #92 (ISO) » Sun Feb 24, 2019 6:07 am

In post 86, Brigitte wrote:It's not cool to vote my townreads on bad reasoning!

I kind of agree but I think there are times when pushing a town read will result in either a town read or a scum read and that can be kinda necessary if you're not sure on someone. I'd rather people push someone over sitting around pushing no one or just sheeping people. The more active town players, the more likely we are to pull out a V.

Also wagons a lot of the time are very good for analysis as far as who's scum and who's not, IMO. I love wagons, I love RVS, and I love having wild RVSs that result in getting out with p serious reads instead of boring ones where people just kinda sit there and wait for it to be over.

Brigitte · Post Post #93 (ISO) » Sun Feb 24, 2019 6:08 am

In post 89, skitter30 wrote:
In post 83, Brigitte wrote:Enter pretty much said that your vote switch was town indicative.
Which I disagree with, but he was pointing out my reasoning on your posts being for joke posting was the reason for vote switch, not that it was lacking in AI.
but he started off saying reck hadn't done anything ai and made that sound like a negative thing ....

ngl i think he might be buddying you

actually reading this again i dont' know what you're trying to say with the bolded

He first said it "probably wasn't" then went and said it was town indicative. To me it read as someone actively thinking about it while writing up the post. Came to a conclusion I disagree with but I don't see the need in arguing over it. I think you skimmed the post and didn't pick that up or just picked up a contradiction and thought it was scummy.

Enter · Post Post #94 (ISO) » Sun Feb 24, 2019 6:08 am

Since this question has been asked like four times this morning already,

In post 34, Enter wrote:I would agree it's probably not AI. Actually, I like the vote switch. That's a good point. I'd argue that's more town indicative than scum indicative, if anything.

P-Edit: ninjad

Brigitte · Post Post #95 (ISO) » Sun Feb 24, 2019 6:09 am

In post 91, skitter30 wrote:
In post 86, Brigitte wrote:It's not cool to vote my townreads on bad reasoning!
why is he a townread

I am not in the habit of over explaining townreads.

skitter30 · Post Post #96 (ISO) » Sun Feb 24, 2019 6:13 am

In post 31, Enter wrote:
In post 30, Brigitte wrote:
In post 29, Enter wrote:
In post 24, Brigitte wrote:I plead the fifth.
It doesn't matter, I don't think I've ever played with you before. How interested are you in lynching reckoner?
None at all right now.

I don't think he has generated anything of AI quality yet.
That doesn't make you think things? We're already on the second page and there is no AI content coming from his slot. Seems a bit interesting, doesn't it?

i'm talking about this post ^^^^ which came before that one, and he definitively said that there's no ai content from his slot, and the implication is that this is a bad thing and that he wants you to consider it more carefully

after you didn't pick up on that line of reasoning he changed his mind and said it was ai and that it was townie

Brigitte · Post Post #97 (ISO) » Sun Feb 24, 2019 6:16 am

I don't think this lack of consistency is scummy.

u r a person 2 · Post Post #98 (ISO) » Sun Feb 24, 2019 6:18 am

yay skitter is probably town because of this interaction

Brigitte · Post Post #99 (ISO) » Sun Feb 24, 2019 6:18 am

I also think if Enter was trying to buddy me here, he probably wouldn't put me as one of his top scumreads. Seems like a roundabout way of buddying.