Merchant's Daughter [Endgame]

[Krazy]

I'm not sure what you're hoping to accomplish at this point Nancy, I think it's safe to say you don't want to sign up for future FakeGod games, and he seems to be pretty done with this conversation, so while it's a shame that there's so many negative feelings in the post-game, it'd probably be best to just move on.

[Nancy Drew 39]

I'm not sure what you're hoping to accomplish at this point Nancy, I think it's safe to say you don't want to sign up for future FakeGod games, and he seems to be pretty done with this conversation, so while it's a shame that there's so many negative feelings in the post-game, it'd probably be best to just move on.

He still hasn’t withdrawn his slanderous accusation, let alone apologized to me, so no, not dropping it.

[Ankamius]

What even is this

Nancy is angry because she believes that I should have asked her for an explanation in private, and not damage her public image like I did through a public inquiry. In addition, she believes that DT should not have told everyone that she has been banned for similar behavior before, and I shouldn't have approved him afterwards.

I think her argument makes sense. She doesn't want people to know that she is a repeat offender, and she doesn't want her public image to suffer from this. I am of belief that you should always meet your mistakes head on, but I understand her position. Therefore, I apologized.

But... he did.

[Firebringer]

No ank ur wrong.

[Nancy Drew 39]

What even is this

Nancy is angry because she believes that I should have asked her for an explanation in private, and not damage her public image like I did through a public inquiry. In addition, she believes that DT should not have told everyone that she has been banned for similar behavior before, and I shouldn't have approved him afterwards.

I think her argument makes sense.

She doesn't want people to know that she is a repeat offender

, and she doesn't want her public image to suffer from this. I am of belief that you should always meet your mistakes head on, but I understand her position. Therefore, I apologized.

But... he did.

In what world, is this even remotely an apology?

It’s THIS post, in particular, he owes me an apology for - the bolded

lie

, in particular.

[Krazy]

5741 is a pretty great example of how not to apologize if you want people to move on, but it is a great example of how to start a fight with your players in the post-game.

[Firebringer]

that is an interesting take on that post.

[Vedith]

What was the original offence? I didn't read it.

[Nancy Drew 39]

5741 is a pretty great example of how not to apologize if you want people to move on, but it is a great example of how to start a fight with your players in the post-game.

QFT

If he wasn’t the actual mod, I might not care but his opinion carries disproportionate weight and that is what is so outrageous about it, because he had to have been well aware that he was/is abusing his mod powers, when he wrote this post. Who even knows how many people read this before I defended myself against this disgusting slander, who wrongly believe this about me?

If I had failed to address it, people might logically assume, I didn’t because he was right about me. He clearly doesn’t care that the truth was pretty much collateral damage in this kangeroo court.

I made a silly mistake, which I owned up to, apologized for and promised not to repeat. Heve I even once backtracked on either one of those? No. So, how - on top of already egregiously violating my privacy - is this post even a thing?

[Vedith]

If it helps Nancy, I believe you. \o/
And if you didn't mention it I would never have known, so I take that as a positive win win between us.

[Nancy Drew 39]

What was the original offence? I didn't read it.

I was upset with Fire and instead of doing the logical desirable thing,

I tilt replaced out over fear of being banned for saying something I shouldn’t

. I have already mentioned all of the reasons, why this didn’t happen at the time. And do I rightly deserve to be held accountable for that? Yes. But that doesn’t mean I deserve to be wrongly accused - by the mod - of something I did not do: Strategical replace out to intentionally compromise the game, because some people made incorrect assumptions about my alignment.

I did no such thing but that is what FG is falsely accusing me of.

[Nancy Drew 39]

If it helps Nancy, I believe you. \o/
And if you didn't mention it I would never have known, so I take that as a positive win win between us.

<3

Thanks, I really appreciate it. I never would INTENTIONALLY do that and even the MU mods have acknowledged this. I wasn’t temp banned on there due to having bad intentions but in that case, UNLIKE

this

one, I was responsible for the consequences and I definitely did learn from that and FG was incorrect to jump to the ludicrous conclusion that not wanting my privacy to be violated anymore than it already had been by turning the aftermath of this game into a circus - that I had done what he is wrongly accusing me of.

I was in such a state of shock post- game that I was completely floored by what FG was doing but now that I have calmed down, I will continue to state and restate the truth, because if I don’t someone will inevitably unfairly throw this bullshit slander in my face, at some point in the future.

[Firebringer]

man this whole thing seems surreal but also de ja vu

[Dr Worm]

NANCERY you ONLY need 908 MORE POSTS to get to 2000!! I BELEIVE YOU CAN DO IT IF YOU PUT YOUR MIND TO IT!!

[Gamma Emerald]

I think FG already moved on from this

[Nancy Drew 39]

NANCERY you ONLY need 908 MORE POSTS to get to 2000!! I BELEIVE YOU CAN DO IT IF YOU PUT YOUR MIND TO IT!!

What happens when I get to 2000?

[Nancy Drew 39]

I think FG already moved on from this

Because he’s afraid to face me.