Mini 2059: Secrets of the Anuket Topaz [Over]

Ankamius · Post Post #600 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 4:58 am

VOTE: u r a person 2

Ankamius · Post Post #601 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 4:59 am

In post 599, u r a person 2 wrote:You're not really giving reads. You're just shading me and inexplicably calling nmsa town. What reasons do you have?

VOTE: nmsa

I'm ready to do this tbh. got a decent town bloc and caught scum

This is not a town response

Let's gooooooo

u r a person 2 · Post Post #602 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 4:59 am

aiiyo there we go buddy! Now you're doing it!

u r a person 2 · Post Post #603 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 4:59 am

Me or NMSA let's go!

Ankamius · Post Post #604 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 5:00 am

I'll find your buddies tomorrow dw

u r a person 2 · Post Post #605 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 5:00 am

There's one scum in us.

@enter you like clearing people through flips right? (re: reck vs. skitter)

Here you go mate. This is the dichotomy

Ankamius · Post Post #606 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 5:00 am

Better NK me!!!

Enter · Post Post #607 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 5:00 am

"There's no resistance to NMSA lynch"
-can't get vote to L-1
-At least three people calling the head of the wagon scum
:eyeroll:

u r a person 2 · Post Post #608 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 5:02 am

In post 601, Ankamius wrote:
In post 599, u r a person 2 wrote:You're not really giving reads. You're just shading me and inexplicably calling nmsa town. What reasons do you have?

VOTE: nmsa

I'm ready to do this tbh. got a decent town bloc and caught scum
This is not a town response

Let's gooooooo

nice sidestep~ you have no reasons

Enter · Post Post #609 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 5:03 am

Also Brig was here!

I don't wanna L-1 until I catch up, but consider it informal.

u r a person 2 · Post Post #610 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 5:04 am

@all
If you don't want to lynch nmsa today, get your votes on me. let's go

Enter · Post Post #611 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 5:04 am

I'll L-1 when I get back from work unless we're doing nothing and I can L-1 while I'm at work.

Ankamius · Post Post #612 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 5:10 am

Urap2 keep denying your guilt

Ankamius · Post Post #613 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 5:12 am

Your responses aren't town trying to get me to engage into the game and get reads, your responses are deflecting my read on you even after I explain why I didn't want to push you initially

Lynch this please

u r a person 2 · Post Post #614 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 5:13 am

In post 599, u r a person 2 wrote:What reasons do you have?

u r a person 2 · Post Post #615 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 5:14 am

prove me wrong. just prove me fucking wrong.

Ankamius · Post Post #616 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 5:24 am

What is your excuse for that not being a reason?

u r a person 2 · Post Post #617 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 5:32 am

In post 587, Ankamius wrote:Ok so for real

I don't like the homogenized gamestate we are in right now

Either scum are pocketed to hell and back or there's enough mislynches at the bottom of the chain to hide them until they can break the townblock that's been forming apart

In a vacuum I'd expect at least one scum in the active posters atm and currently I think it's most likely to be urap2 via toneread

Chara could be scum this game but I also incorrectly scumread it last time we played in the same game so I don't trust that read as much

NMSA is probably town if I had to guess

I mean you scum read me in this post, and all of your reasons =/ are about posts after this post.

So, frankly, I think you were bullshitting in this post. Where was my tone scum-indicative?

Ankamius · Post Post #618 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 5:37 am

So?

Toneread = overall tone

I just also happened to find your response to my scumread really scummy

Enter · Post Post #619 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 6:04 am

In post 528, Brigitte wrote:hi guys quick post while I got time! I know urap2 and enter missed me =)

You remind me of someone else on site.

I wanted to go into a lot of the posts i missed but i think that will have to wait till friday. Right now just wanted to say some of my read changes and go into a little bit about them.

I am scumreading Branson. I am leaning scum on Chara, least confident here on this read change. I am townreading Reckoner.

Branson I looked through the posts and was trying to dissect the thought process. Not sure it was all there. She says she is going by logic but the logic seemed to have been by intuition or make it up as you go. For instance the feelings on reckoner town, and the case against skitter I thought was trying to logic a case on how someones actions don't make sense without thinking of it made sense from that persons perspective which didn't sit right with the whole thinking as reckoner and other comments made on skitter.

Reckoner has a different approach to this game than I would, he is reading players who go against consensus like branson as that is town which to me is bad play, and when you think of his reads in these terms you go "why is he not townreading Enter as town for that mindset?" but i think this is due to his overal tendency to skim thread. Not do any deep analysis and i don't think their is a scummy fake positioning here. Call that intuition. I think theres definitely sorting going on even if i think its low level.

Chara is...I don't know how to express this. Odd? Reading Chara posts and I see like an invisible barrier between it and everyone they are talking to. I dont know if this is normal. Could be as they say they are busy. But I don't see the need for this barrier even though your busy. And I know this perception of the posts but I see it in almost every post. I don't know what to make of it. I am not sure on the scumhunting because of this barrier I see. It just makes me think scum putting up a barrier.

Still town: Enter, urap2, skitter.

Still scum: NMSA

Also I disagree with Triss townreads. Not sure why people are townreading her but i don't scumread her so not feeling worth arguing over that.

Hm. Do you know/have you played with Branson/Reck before? I'm curious why you're hard on Bran but easy on reck. Chara is definitely disengaged. The only player here I have any certainty on in my reads is Reck, so I'm interested in the way you're reading them. I'm actually pretty aligned to read Reck as scum - particularly because he's now pushing lurkers. Branson/Ank I flip back and forth on a lot. Chara I'm just going to give more time to, I think. Pretty frustrated with how close so many of the players are to null for me, though. I think the flip will help things make a little more sense.

Enter · Post Post #620 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 6:07 am

In post 546, Chara wrote:
In post 544, Brigitte wrote:Chara be all the controversial in the world =)

Just want you to be engaged because I have hard time reading disengaged <3
i want to be controversial, that i'm not now is the problem.
Enter's towny, skitter's towny, you're towny. even u2 is towny. there's nothing i find particularly in need of correcting. i could be paranoid of one of those but i'm simply not feeling that.

Ank/Branson and Reck. Talk about them.

Ankamius · Post Post #621 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 6:10 am

I'm well within both my town range and my scum range btw

Enter · Post Post #622 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 6:11 am

I know who Brigitte is.

In post 553, Chara wrote:i don't find Branson especially towny, which is sort of the same as being fine with others finding her scummy. i'm having trouble actually sorting the slot.

and u2 voting nmsa is exactly what he said he wanted to be doing, so i feel no need to insult him. :> plus, he's nice.

this is why I push wagons I don't necessarily believe in. Put her in situations where she has to make decisions. Especially if you're finding it hard to find some way to be engaged, pushing someone and asking her to join you means she has to share thoughts, or pushing her means she has to defend herself. Either way you get a better feel for the slot.

PEdit why post that

Ankamius · Post Post #623 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 6:19 am

Why not

Enter · Post Post #624 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 6:27 am

The number of people not caught up needs to change.

Ank: my gut reads scum, my head reads maybe town. I like the vote switching yesterday, I think. Reads kinda like flailing not knowing who to vote which shouldn't be happening as scum. I like temporarily sleeping reck. I think? I like pushing urap2 just in the fact that it's controversial and too scummy to be scum in a way.

I don't like that she called skitter scum and then didn't push and doesn't know who to vote. Did your read change on skitter, ank? I don't like that most of her analysis seems to be about her own town/scum game. And I don't like that I feel like she's always making excuses to catch up.

PEdit: you have BoP