Mini 2059: Secrets of the Anuket Topaz [Over]

tris · Post Post #675 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:33 am

In post 670, Ankamius wrote:tris and reck are virtually locktown

What?

Brigitte · Post Post #676 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:34 am

In post 668, Ankamius wrote:Brigitte is looking like scum #2

Yeah I think you said this before. Its a nice story.
NMSA said it too.

Would love to hear the end of the story.

Ankamius · Post Post #677 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:34 am

VOTE: u r a person 2

u r a person 2 · Post Post #678 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:35 am

would love to hear anything from NMSA atm.

Hammer could have been timed better, triss =/

Brigitte · Post Post #679 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:35 am

In post 626, Ankamius wrote:Pushing controversial reads/stances is more likely to come from scum me

It really is irking me you describe your scum play like this. And that is the play you are doing right now.

Ankamius · Post Post #680 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:36 am

In post 626, Ankamius wrote:Unless I have an already established basis for it

nice discredit brigitte

Ankamius · Post Post #681 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:36 am

btw I have a basis for these scumreads (:

vote urap2

Brigitte · Post Post #682 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:36 am

In post 680, Ankamius wrote:
In post 626, Ankamius wrote:Unless I have an already established basis for it
nice discredit brigitte

I am eagerly awaiting for this basis.

u r a person 2 · Post Post #683 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:37 am

In post 682, Brigitte wrote:I am eagerly awaiting for this basis.

Didn't you hear? I have a scummy tone throughout my 5 pages of content

Ankamius · Post Post #684 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:38 am

easy

urap2's reaction to the hammer was a very fake response
and your reaction was to completely ignore it <--- scum-indicative in my experience

Brigitte · Post Post #685 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:39 am

In post 683, u r a person 2 wrote:
In post 682, Brigitte wrote:I am eagerly awaiting for this basis.
Didn't you hear? I have a scummy tone throughout my 5 pages of content

Ohh I guess that is credible than.

WE ARE DONE HERE PACK IT UP.
ANK FIGURED IT OUT!

tris · Post Post #686 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:39 am

Why am I town?

Ankamius · Post Post #687 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:40 am

In post 686, tris wrote:Why am I town?

did you fake hammer on purpose

Brigitte · Post Post #688 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:40 am

In post 684, Ankamius wrote:easy

urap2's reaction to the hammer was a very fake response
and your reaction was to completely ignore it <--- scum-indicative in my experience

How was his post about it being a good lynch fake when urap2 has been wanting that lynch all day? You can't just take a single post and pretend that is the whole context of the situation.

Yeah I actually missed hammer. I was busying disecting you and reck little side show.

tris · Post Post #689 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:41 am

In post 687, Ankamius wrote:
In post 686, tris wrote:Why am I town?
did you fake hammer on purpose

Yeah, do you think I wouldn't have as scum?
UNVOTE:

xRECKONERx · Post Post #690 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:41 am

In post 674, Brigitte wrote:
In post 669, xRECKONERx wrote:
In post 660, Brigitte wrote:
In post 640, xRECKONERx wrote:we aren't ever going to get a free chance to lynch lurkers moving forward

d1 is the only possible day where there's time for it bc d2 and onwards everyone will have bigger fish to fry

so please god give us the nim lynch
lady angel is probably getting replaced
Why push a lurker when you think they are getting replaced? What?
are you incapable of reading

i said i wanted a nim lynch
because landy angel is getting replaced
Lately I have been skimming your posts since you tend to skim posts in the thread as well.
I noticed you are voting lady angel. Then you say they are getting replaced. So no idea why you say "I want nim lynch" and are voting a person you think is getting replaced.

Maybe you should read.

because why would i bother moving my vote if there's no appetite for a wagon and tris just hammered

xRECKONERx · Post Post #691 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:41 am

i see it was fake.

xRECKONERx · Post Post #692 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:41 am

okey dokey then

VOTE: nim

Ankamius · Post Post #693 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:42 am

In post 689, tris wrote:
In post 687, Ankamius wrote:
In post 686, tris wrote:Why am I town?
did you fake hammer on purpose
Yeah, do you think I wouldn't have as scum?
UNVOTE:

very unlikely

u r a person 2 · Post Post #694 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:44 am

In post 684, Ankamius wrote:easy

urap2's reaction to the hammer was a very fake response
and your reaction was to completely ignore it <--- scum-indicative in my experience

Here's a post I made directly after a hammer vote --- as town

In post 790, u r a person 2 wrote:good vote

tris · Post Post #695 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:44 am

Oh, do you still scum read skitter?

Ankamius · Post Post #696 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:44 am

In post 694, u r a person 2 wrote:
In post 684, Ankamius wrote:easy

urap2's reaction to the hammer was a very fake response
and your reaction was to completely ignore it <--- scum-indicative in my experience
Here's a post I made directly after a hammer vote --- as town

In post 790, u r a person 2 wrote:good vote

your posts right after that look a lot more town than what you did in this game

Ankamius · Post Post #697 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:45 am

In post 695, tris wrote:Oh, do you still scum read skitter?

I'm pushing that off into the distance to revisit later

probably when I can fit her into a solve

u r a person 2 · Post Post #698 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:45 am

And yes, the hammer was fake, that's why I was hoping NMSA was around =/

As I said, triss, it could have been timed better

Brigitte · Post Post #699 (ISO) » Thu Feb 28, 2019 7:46 am

VOTE: Ankamius