Mini 2059: Secrets of the Anuket Topaz [Over]

xRECKONERx · Post Post #1250 (ISO) » Sat Mar 02, 2019 5:30 pm

eh im not sure ive read you as angry at all, so i dont really care about the first paragraph.

i think the criticism of "you copied your case on me from my case on you" is pretty fucking wild tbh and even if that's the case, i dont see how it's alignment indicative. like, would scum be more likely to rip a case from their accuser? it's just a weird criticism. i dont think anyone ever in the history of this game, scum or town, has said "im gonna copy my target's case". it's so wild.

i think newbtown is an easy position to take but that doesn't make it valid.
i also think nmsa is newbtown. is it an easy statement to make? yes.
do i think it's true? yes.

brigitte is probably scum tbh. the whole "case" against you is a bunch of shit that doesn't actually track in my head but damn did she say it passionately enough for it to SEEM like there's substance

Ankamius · Post Post #1251 (ISO) » Sat Mar 02, 2019 5:35 pm

Glad to see I'm not going insane for that being a scummy case lol

Brigitte · Post Post #1252 (ISO) » Sat Mar 02, 2019 5:40 pm

Person who read me as scummy before you asked them about my case. Thinks I make a scummy case.

Woah. That is shocking.

Ankamius · Post Post #1253 (ISO) » Sat Mar 02, 2019 5:42 pm

In post 1252, Brigitte wrote:Person who read me as scummy before you asked them about my case. Thinks I make a scummy case.

Woah. That is shocking.

Cool, I still got the impression that he actually analyzed it so even with bias, he still responded to the case itself and didn't just label it as scum and leave it at that

Brigitte · Post Post #1254 (ISO) » Sat Mar 02, 2019 5:42 pm

Can you be anymore obvious right now though?
Like I can't imagine.

Someone as town. Would ask someone who was scumreading me. What their thoughts on a case I make, and then act like 'ohh I guess I am not being irrational right now'.

Like if you are thinking in these terms as town. I don't even have words for you.

Brigitte · Post Post #1255 (ISO) » Sat Mar 02, 2019 5:43 pm

In post 1253, Ankamius wrote:
In post 1252, Brigitte wrote:Person who read me as scummy before you asked them about my case. Thinks I make a scummy case.

Woah. That is shocking.
Cool, I still got the impression that he actually analyzed it so even with bias, he still responded to the case itself and didn't just label it as scum and leave it at that

He isn't even reading the thread and you know it.

u r a person 2 · Post Post #1256 (ISO) » Sat Mar 02, 2019 5:45 pm

In post 1254, Brigitte wrote:Can you be anymore obvious right now though?
Like I can't imagine.

Someone as town. Would ask someone who was scumreading me. What their thoughts on a case I make, and then act like 'ohh I guess I am not being irrational right now'.

Like if you are thinking in these terms as town. I don't even have words for you.

=/

If I have a town read whom I respect and we're meshing a bit on reads, I might use them as a sanity check on a read. why not?

You can't really believe this.

Ankamius · Post Post #1257 (ISO) » Sat Mar 02, 2019 5:45 pm

So?

He's also one of my townreads and has enough of a different view of the game to have a different outlook

It's entirely possible to scumread someone and not find specific things scummy

Brigitte · Post Post #1258 (ISO) » Sat Mar 02, 2019 5:46 pm

In post 1256, u r a person 2 wrote:
In post 1254, Brigitte wrote:Can you be anymore obvious right now though?
Like I can't imagine.

Someone as town. Would ask someone who was scumreading me. What their thoughts on a case I make, and then act like 'ohh I guess I am not being irrational right now'.

Like if you are thinking in these terms as town. I don't even have words for you.
=/

If I have a town read whom I respect and we're meshing a bit on reads, I might use them as a sanity check on a read. why not?

You can't really believe this.

If you have the same read on the same person asking that person is pointless. Why would you think to do this?

Ankamius · Post Post #1259 (ISO) » Sat Mar 02, 2019 5:47 pm

In post 1257, Ankamius wrote:It's entirely possible to scumread someone and not find specific things scummy

Brigitte · Post Post #1260 (ISO) » Sat Mar 02, 2019 5:47 pm

In post 1259, Ankamius wrote:
In post 1257, Ankamius wrote:It's entirely possible to scumread someone and not find specific things scummy

For the millionth time.
You are having another fucking conversation here.

Ankamius · Post Post #1261 (ISO) » Sat Mar 02, 2019 5:48 pm

Ummmmmmmmm

what lol

u r a person 2 · Post Post #1262 (ISO) » Sat Mar 02, 2019 5:48 pm

In post 1259, Ankamius wrote:
In post 1257, Ankamius wrote:It's entirely possible to scumread someone and not find specific things scummy

yah, this. This line of thinking basically assumes anyone, or at least reck on you, with a scum read is blindly tunneling.

Ankamius · Post Post #1263 (ISO) » Sat Mar 02, 2019 5:50 pm

does it help to mention that I'm prone to deathtunnels

Brigitte · Post Post #1264 (ISO) » Sat Mar 02, 2019 5:50 pm

u r a person 2. I don't get this. You think that ankamius is thinking she is going crazy, wants another perspective if the post is scummy or means nothing. Asks reckoner. Who isn't reading the game. Has a scumread on me. If that post is or isn't scummy.

All of this seems reasonable versus asking almost anyone else she might be townreading.

This is what you are thinking?

Ankamius · Post Post #1265 (ISO) » Sat Mar 02, 2019 5:52 pm

This is scum trying to salvage a push too hard lol

Brigitte · Post Post #1266 (ISO) » Sat Mar 02, 2019 5:53 pm

In post 1263, Ankamius wrote:does it help to mention that I'm prone to deathtunnels

I don't think anyone should allow this to slide later in the game btw.
When ankamius scumreads flip town. Letting her get away with this shouldn't be a thing.

u r a person 2 · Post Post #1267 (ISO) » Sat Mar 02, 2019 5:53 pm

I don't necessarily agree with your givens. I think it's clear reck read the case Ank quoted, and I think Ank was probably exaggerating her concern a tad.

But yeah, I think it's reasonable. I think it would have also been reasonable to ask someone else. Ank was here, reck was here. I'm not losing sleep over her decision.

Ankamius · Post Post #1268 (ISO) » Sat Mar 02, 2019 5:54 pm

????????

skitter30 · Post Post #1269 (ISO) » Sat Mar 02, 2019 5:54 pm

In post 1075, Nimueh wrote:Can someone tell me why Rec is town?

because of his reaction to the first fake-hammer

maybe if i keep reminding myself i won't forget for later: there was definitely scum on the nmsa wagon

In post 1089, Nimueh wrote:
In post 1082, Enter wrote:
In post 1080, Nimueh wrote:@Enter, any particular reason, you ignored this post?
I didn't, you posted that after anything I've posted today.
So, you’re here now. Do you tr Rec? He put NMSA at L-1.

why is putting nmsa at l-1 important and/or relevant and/or scummy?

==

In post 1109, Nimueh wrote:
In post 1104, Enter wrote:Alright, time's up.

You called tictac lynchbait but you think someone putting their vote on someone who hadn't really posted much at all is bad?
And you're only concerned with people getting their votes off of you, not concerned with why people put their votes there in the first place.
Get back to me, when you’ve actually read my posts. Thanks.

oh ffs
i think i know who you are.
if you are please just answer this and i'll leave, thank you

==

In post 1166, Enter wrote:I found a broken tape recorder and it's got speech to text on. That's what happened.
No I'm not gonna hear the "this is TvT" what town reason does she have to evade questions like this?

i dont' know of any of her posting here is actually, like, ai for her; i don't think it's inherently scummy even though it's a pain to even try to read (in the sense of actually, like, reading the posts, not even in the sense of trying to read her alignment)

==

In post 1208, Brigitte wrote:You pretending you are not angry during the game by throwing around sarcasm with it, obviously actually angry.

i don't think she's been actually angry?

In post 1208, Brigitte wrote:You even added the confidence level I had on you as your next post. Except instead of what I said as 85% you are 90%. Woah. You are a legend.

and this is also a rather strange thing to scumread someone for
i kinda read this thing a few times and ultimately i'm not sure what your argument is for ank being scum tbh

In post 1254, Brigitte wrote:Can you be anymore obvious right now though?
Like I can't imagine.

Someone as town. Would ask someone who was scumreading me. What their thoughts on a case I make, and then act like 'ohh I guess I am not being irrational right now'.

Like if you are thinking in these terms as town. I don't even have words for you.

this is a weird post; i think that sounds like a thought process a townie might have?

==

In post 1219, Flubbernugget wrote:VOTE: ankamius

i actually think ank is pretty townie in this convo she's having here with brigitte; not sure why you're voting her here

==
i'm caught up

town: reck, enter, urap
nulltown: ank
somewhere between null and nulltown: flubber
idk: tris, brigitte, nmsa, tictac, elbirn
nullscum: chara
can't read: nimueh

i have too many nullreads, and i don't really explicitly scumread anyone rn, which is a problem

skitter30 · Post Post #1270 (ISO) » Sat Mar 02, 2019 5:55 pm

In post 1264, Brigitte wrote:u r a person 2. I don't get this. You think that ankamius is thinking she is going crazy, wants another perspective if the post is scummy or means nothing. Asks reckoner. Who isn't reading the game. Has a scumread on me. If that post is or isn't scummy.

All of this seems reasonable versus asking almost anyone else she might be townreading.

This is what you are thinking?

i mean he can scumread you and not think that the post is scummy
also i think she asked him because he was around and she was wondering his opinion on it

Brigitte · Post Post #1271 (ISO) » Sat Mar 02, 2019 5:56 pm

In post 1267, u r a person 2 wrote:I don't necessarily agree with your givens. I think it's clear reck read the case Ank quoted, and I think Ank was probably exaggerating her concern a tad.

But yeah, I think it's reasonable. I think it would have also been reasonable to ask someone else. Ank was here, reck was here. I'm not losing sleep over her decision.

What givens do you not agree with here?

All of this seems fake and just used to get more general consensus around her. Which to me isn't hard to do if you ask people who agree with you to basically agree with you, which is what i saw with that post.

skitter30 · Post Post #1272 (ISO) » Sat Mar 02, 2019 5:56 pm

In post 1268, Ankamius wrote:????????

she's saying you should be bop scumread after the people you've deathtunneled flip town

Ankamius · Post Post #1273 (ISO) » Sat Mar 02, 2019 5:57 pm

If you're town, you need to reset

That's two other people who are agreeing with me in this now

skitter30 · Post Post #1274 (ISO) » Sat Mar 02, 2019 5:58 pm

In post 1271, Brigitte wrote:
In post 1267, u r a person 2 wrote:I don't necessarily agree with your givens. I think it's clear reck read the case Ank quoted, and I think Ank was probably exaggerating her concern a tad.

But yeah, I think it's reasonable. I think it would have also been reasonable to ask someone else. Ank was here, reck was here. I'm not losing sleep over her decision.
What givens do you not agree with here?

All of this seems fake and just used to get more general consensus around her. Which to me isn't hard to do if you ask people
who agree with you to basically agree with you
, which is what i saw with that post.

i mean i'm pretty sure she jsut flat-out asked reck for his opinino in a really really general sense, and after he called your case scummy, she agreed.
i don't think she indicated which way she wanted him to read that post first