did yall discuss it in your scumtopic insteadIn post 1348, u r a person 2 wrote:Actually, looking back I don't think I discussed this at allIn post 1342, xRECKONERx wrote:Wow hey Brigitte that's two other people who don't understand your insistence that I'm not reading
Are they just not reading the game too
okay, examplesIn post 1347, Brigitte wrote:I don't think 'has a handle on state of game' is same as 'knowing everything that has happened in the game'. So you can show that he has been following the game as of late, which I think isn't completely inaccurate. But I am pretty tired of his constant missing things in this game, and he has been doing it a lot. He misses context. He skims incessantly. I am just tired of it.
Nope.In post 1351, u r a person 2 wrote:okay, examplesIn post 1347, Brigitte wrote:I don't think 'has a handle on state of game' is same as 'knowing everything that has happened in the game'. So you can show that he has been following the game as of late, which I think isn't completely inaccurate. But I am pretty tired of his constant missing things in this game, and he has been doing it a lot. He misses context. He skims incessantly. I am just tired of it.
VOTE: brigitte
I think it’s townie, inIn post 1189, Ankamius wrote:Spoiler:
one thing I'm curious about is why you believe this is town-indicative for me specifically
That isn’t what I said. I said I thought it’s townie in general to be leery of easy lurker lynches.In post 1194, Brigitte wrote:So you are town reading easy stances to make. And on a fake tone.In post 1193, Nimueh wrote:I tr you for you stances on what you see as easy lurker lynches and on tone.In post 1190, Ankamius wrote:is there more to it or just from that one pointIn post 1188, Nimueh wrote:In post 1183, Ankamius wrote:that's fine, just knowing you have is enough to lower the possible people you can be down to two people anywaysI would still tr you here, even if I hadn’t played with you before but obviously that helps.In post 1184, Ankamius wrote:and btw that means that them playing like this is NAI
Do you normally town read people who agree with you on stances for lurker lynches?
I’d rather deal with your post directly, if that’s okay with you. From what I’ve gathered, Enter seems to be of the false impression that I’m seeking a free pass for being sick and think that should somehow make me immune from votes, which is something I’ve never even suggested. He misconstruedIn post 1221, NotMySpamAccount wrote:I might be more likely to take it back if you quoted both his question and your answer, to make it clear that you did in fact do so. If you do not, I will continue to assume you are scum.In post 1149, Nimueh wrote:No but you’re probably something I won’t say.In post 1146, NotMySpamAccount wrote:Nimueh is refusing to answer questions, is claiming that Enter is misrepping, and is in fact doing the same thing. Back up your claims with evidence instead of strawmanning. Nimueh is scum.
VOTE: Nimueh
I already did. Do I keep having to spam the thread with the post where I already answered his question, despite him insisting otherwise?
What kind of reaction, do you think he’s trying to provoke? I can see why you would think that but I really felt like I was banging my head against a brick wall with him, so I just gave up. I tend to get frustrated when I keep making the same point numerous times and it continues to get disregarded.In post 1226, NotMySpamAccount wrote:I think you're sick, but that your response was pretty scummy. And a reaction is exactly what Enter has been trying to provoke all game.In post 1177, Nimueh wrote:You can keep insisting I’m scum until hell freezes over and continue to insult me to excuse you terrible play since I started posting more but it doesn’t make it true.In post 1176, Enter wrote:There was a WEEK of gameplay before you got here, Nimueh, and you've been here a couple hours. Your narcissistic belief that the game thread revolves around you baffles me. I've pushed other slots, I've read other slots, and I have a reasonably decent reads list all of which are things that cannot be said for you. I'm not death tunneling you, you came in here halfway through the game day and you pretend that nothing has happened but my read on you. The fact that you're so stubbornly blind to the fact that EVERYONE ELSE has been reading this game and developing repertoire with the other players (except elbirn) is ridiculous to me. There is more to this game than the few pages since you showed up. I know some people don't like to roll scum, but that's no excuse for throwing the game because of it. Get your head out of your rectum and play the game and quit with this ignorant crap. It's disgusting and annoying.
You have the lion’s share of this blame. At least I’m sick, what’s your excuse?
I’m thinking my initial read on him was wrong. An L-1, is obviously relevant, because it makes it easy for scum to hammer. Thank you for answering my question.In post 1269, skitter30 wrote:because of his reaction to the first fake-hammerIn post 1075, Nimueh wrote:Can someone tell me why Rec is town?
maybe if i keep reminding myself i won't forget for later: there was definitely scum on the nmsa wagon
why is putting nmsa at l-1 important and/or relevant and/or scummy?In post 1089, Nimueh wrote:So, you’re here now. Do you tr Rec? He put NMSA at L-1.In post 1082, Enter wrote:I didn't, you posted that after anything I've posted today.In post 1080, Nimueh wrote:@Enter, any particular reason, you ignored this post?
In post 1364, Nimueh wrote:What I said was I didn’t think it was townie
Huh.In post 1079, Nimueh wrote:Bad as in wrong, not scummy.In post 1077, Nimueh wrote:In post 1073, Enter wrote:I can think of two reasons right now why Nimueh s reaction to tris is bad, and one of them I know she knows the answer to.Yeah because I actually am not feeling well and your vote is bad.
In post 1364, Nimueh wrote:Enter seems to be of the false impression that I’m seeking a free pass for being sick and think that should somehow make me immune from votes, which is something I’ve never even suggested.
Huh.In post 1077, Nimueh wrote:In post 1073, Enter wrote:I can think of two reasons right now why Nimueh s reaction to tris is bad, and one of them I know she knows the answer to.Yeah because I actually am not feeling well and your vote is bad.
Huh.In post 1369, Enter wrote:In post 1364, Nimueh wrote:Enter seems to be of the false impression that I’m seeking a free pass for being sick and think that should somehow make me immune from votes, which is something I’ve never even suggested.In post 1059, Nimueh wrote:In post 1056, tris wrote:VOTE: Nimueh
Anything to say about someone other than NMSA (Or I guess tictac)?
I’ve V/LA because I haven’t been feeling well, so no I’m not caught up yet but if this is your sole reason for for voting me, it isn’t a town one.
VOTE: Tris
In post 1073, Enter wrote:I can think of two reasons right now why Nimueh s reaction to tris is bad, and one of them I know she knows the answer to.
This is my problem with you, Nimueh, in addition to the fact that you continue to contradict yourself.In post 1104, Enter wrote:Alright, time's up.
You called tictac lynchbait but you think someone putting their vote on someone who hadn't really posted much at all is bad?
And you're only concerned with people getting their votes off of you, not concerned with why people put their votes there in the first place.
First quote was about Tris’ initial vote on me, which I already explained.In post 1367, Enter wrote:In post 1364, Nimueh wrote:What I said was I didn’t think it was townieHuh.In post 1079, Nimueh wrote:Bad as in wrong, not scummy.In post 1077, Nimueh wrote:In post 1073, Enter wrote:I can think of two reasons right now why Nimueh s reaction to tris is bad, and one of them I know she knows the answer to.Yeah because I actually am not feeling well and your vote is bad.