Mini 2059: Secrets of the Anuket Topaz [Over]

Brigitte · Post Post #1725 (ISO) » Sun Mar 03, 2019 11:54 am

God damn it Ank. You are making me doubt my scumread on you now too.

Nimueh · Post Post #1726 (ISO) » Sun Mar 03, 2019 11:54 am

In post 1686, Brigitte wrote:I don't know what to do with this information.

Don’t threaten me with that or I will seriously consider replacing out.

Brigitte · Post Post #1727 (ISO) » Sun Mar 03, 2019 11:55 am

In post 1726, Nimueh wrote:
In post 1686, Brigitte wrote:I don't know what to do with this information.
Don’t threaten me with that or I will seriously consider replacing out.

Why would I threaten you with it?

Brigitte · Post Post #1728 (ISO) » Sun Mar 03, 2019 11:55 am

VOTE: tictac

Nimueh · Post Post #1729 (ISO) » Sun Mar 03, 2019 11:59 am

In post 1689, skitter30 wrote:uh remember what happened in the last game i played with you ??????????

You realize my hands are kind of tied in answering this kind of question?

I will just say that I want to be a player who is considered a valuable asset to town and not one who has a negative effect on the gamestate.

I’d be more than happy to elaborate on this via PM post-game, if you like?

Nimueh · Post Post #1730 (ISO) » Sun Mar 03, 2019 12:01 pm

In post 1691, NotMySpamAccount wrote:
Nimueh wrote:
In post 1638, NotMySpamAccount wrote:
In post 1634, Brigitte wrote:
SKITTER. TELL ME WHAT READS TO GIVE THESE TWO!!!!
Ask yourself two questions. Did I make it clear what I wanted from Nim? Did she respond as requested? That should help you sort her.
Why did you link me and Brigitte? I’m not letting you worm out of this.
Because both of you were scummy, though Brigitte is becoming marginally less so by comparison with you.

So, you’re saying you don’t see any partnery interactions between us then?

Because this is really not a good answer to my question. Sr both of us isn’t the reason I’m voting you,

linking us together

, is.

Nimueh · Post Post #1731 (ISO) » Sun Mar 03, 2019 12:04 pm

In post 1693, NotMySpamAccount wrote:
In post 1692, Nimueh wrote:
In post 1641, NotMySpamAccount wrote:
In post 1639, Brigitte wrote:
In post 1636, skitter30 wrote:ngl i kinda want to vote nimueh; she feels really flat here for her and i'm kinda surprised that she's not scumreading enter here tbh

pedit
WHY ARE YOU ASKING MY OPINION!!!!!!

I DONT TRUST MYSELF RIGHT NOW!!!
chill. regardless of alignment you need to calm down and read isos for reads or something.
don't flail
.
I legit can’t tell anymore if this is bussing or not but you voting me and persisting in ignoring the elephant in the room, is pinging my scumdar off the charts rn.
the elephant in the room being?

You told Brigitte to stop “flailing” or something, which is why I think you two are linked. also that uberweird “course” exchange earlier.

NotMySpamAccount · Post Post #1732 (ISO) » Sun Mar 03, 2019 12:05 pm

Nimueh wrote:
In post 1691, NotMySpamAccount wrote:
Nimueh wrote:
In post 1638, NotMySpamAccount wrote:
In post 1634, Brigitte wrote:
SKITTER. TELL ME WHAT READS TO GIVE THESE TWO!!!!
Ask yourself two questions. Did I make it clear what I wanted from Nim? Did she respond as requested? That should help you sort her.
Why did you link me and Brigitte? I’m not letting you worm out of this.
Because both of you were scummy, though Brigitte is becoming marginally less so by comparison with you.
So, you’re saying you don’t see any partnery interactions between us then?

Because this is really not a good answer to my question. Sr both of us isn’t the reason I’m voting you,
linking us together
, is.

I think Brig is scum because she acted scummy, and that you're scum becasue you acted scummy. It's really not that hard to understand.

tris · Post Post #1733 (ISO) » Sun Mar 03, 2019 12:05 pm

My initial reaction to Brigitte's interaction with Ank earlier on was to want to vote Brigitte even before everything that followed came. I think I want to take a moment to review Brigitte.

----------------------------------------------------------------

@Enter I think you have misinterpreted some of what Nim has been saying.

In post 1367, Enter wrote:
In post 1364, Nimueh wrote:What I said was I didn’t think it was townie

In post 1079, Nimueh wrote:
In post 1077, Nimueh wrote:
In post 1073, Enter wrote:I can think of two reasons right now why Nimueh s reaction to tris is bad, and one of them I know she knows the answer to.

In post 1074, Enter wrote:VOTE: nimueh
Yeah because I actually am not feeling well and your vote is bad.
Bad as in wrong, not scummy.
Huh.

This was referring to your vote, not to mine.

In post 1370, Enter wrote:
In post 1369, Enter wrote:
In post 1364, Nimueh wrote:Enter seems to be of the false impression that I’m seeking a free pass for being sick and think that should somehow make me immune from votes, which is something I’ve never even suggested.

In post 1059, Nimueh wrote:
In post 1056, tris wrote:VOTE: Nimueh

Anything to say about someone other than NMSA (Or I guess tictac)?

I’ve V/LA because I haven’t been feeling well, so no I’m not caught up yet but if this is your sole reason for for voting me, it isn’t a town one.

VOTE: Tris
Huh.

And in this post she wasn't saying I shouldn't vote for her because she's sick. The sickness was just the reason she wasn't caught up yet.

Nimueh · Post Post #1734 (ISO) » Sun Mar 03, 2019 12:06 pm

In post 1697, skitter30 wrote:i don't understand the narrative nimueh is pushing rn

NMSA is linking me and Brigitte. Both of us are currently being pushed. That strikes me as kind of opportunistic, don’t you think?

NotMySpamAccount · Post Post #1735 (ISO) » Sun Mar 03, 2019 12:06 pm

In post 1731, Nimueh wrote:
In post 1693, NotMySpamAccount wrote:
In post 1692, Nimueh wrote:
In post 1641, NotMySpamAccount wrote:
In post 1639, Brigitte wrote:
In post 1636, skitter30 wrote:ngl i kinda want to vote nimueh; she feels really flat here for her and i'm kinda surprised that she's not scumreading enter here tbh

pedit
WHY ARE YOU ASKING MY OPINION!!!!!!

I DONT TRUST MYSELF RIGHT NOW!!!
chill. regardless of alignment you need to calm down and read isos for reads or something.
don't flail
.
I legit can’t tell anymore if this is bussing or not but you voting me and persisting in ignoring the elephant in the room, is pinging my scumdar off the charts rn.
the elephant in the room being?
You told Brigitte to stop “flailing” or something, which is why I think you two are linked. also that uberweird “course” exchange earlier.

flailing as in posting uselessly about how you can't get a read. the "course" thing was me scumreading her sarcasticly.

Nimueh · Post Post #1736 (ISO) » Sun Mar 03, 2019 12:08 pm

In post 1700, Enter wrote:
In post 1657, Nimueh wrote:You just answered your own question. It wasn’t at all cool what you said and yes, you absolutely do owe me an apology for that.

I don’t engage with anyone who uses mean-spirited attacks on me.
Lol, you attacked me first.

*punches me
*me punches back

I don't talk to people who punch me

Your self-awareness is 0

Where did I attack or “punch” you?

NotMySpamAccount · Post Post #1737 (ISO) » Sun Mar 03, 2019 12:09 pm

In post 1736, Nimueh wrote:
In post 1700, Enter wrote:
In post 1657, Nimueh wrote:You just answered your own question. It wasn’t at all cool what you said and yes, you absolutely do owe me an apology for that.

I don’t engage with anyone who uses mean-spirited attacks on me.
Lol, you attacked me first.

*punches me
*me punches back

I don't talk to people who punch me

Your self-awareness is 0
Where did I attack or “punch” you?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphor

Nimueh · Post Post #1738 (ISO) » Sun Mar 03, 2019 12:10 pm

In post 1708, NotMySpamAccount wrote:
In post 1706, Nimueh wrote:
In post 1656, skitter30 wrote:VOTE: nimueh
Bad vote Skitter, I’m 100% flipping town.
Oh wow, Nim says she's town, must be town I guess.

I’m willing to hardclaim if it comes down to that.

Ankamius · Post Post #1739 (ISO) » Sun Mar 03, 2019 12:16 pm

Is that it

Are we free

Nimueh · Post Post #1740 (ISO) » Sun Mar 03, 2019 12:16 pm

In post 1727, Brigitte wrote:
In post 1726, Nimueh wrote:
In post 1686, Brigitte wrote:I don't know what to do with this information.
Don’t threaten me with that or I will seriously consider replacing out.
Why would I threaten you with it?

Good, well I know that NMSA has been pushing for this.

Btw, why are you voting Tictac?

NotMySpamAccount · Post Post #1741 (ISO) » Sun Mar 03, 2019 12:20 pm

In post 1740, Nimueh wrote:
In post 1727, Brigitte wrote:
In post 1726, Nimueh wrote:
In post 1686, Brigitte wrote:I don't know what to do with this information.
Don’t threaten me with that or I will seriously consider replacing out.
Why would I threaten you with it?
Good, well I know that NMSA has been pushing for this.

Btw, why are you voting Tictac?

care to explain?

Nimueh · Post Post #1742 (ISO) » Sun Mar 03, 2019 12:20 pm

In post 1733, tris wrote:My initial reaction to Brigitte's interaction with Ank earlier on was to want to vote Brigitte even before everything that followed came. I think I want to take a moment to review Brigitte.

----------------------------------------------------------------

@Enter I think you have misinterpreted some of what Nim has been saying.

In post 1367, Enter wrote:
In post 1364, Nimueh wrote:What I said was I didn’t think it was townie

In post 1079, Nimueh wrote:
In post 1077, Nimueh wrote:
In post 1073, Enter wrote:I can think of two reasons right now why Nimueh s reaction to tris is bad, and one of them I know she knows the answer to.

In post 1074, Enter wrote:VOTE: nimueh
Yeah because I actually am not feeling well and your vote is bad.
Bad as in wrong, not scummy.
Huh.
This was referring to your vote, not to mine.

In post 1370, Enter wrote:
In post 1369, Enter wrote:
In post 1364, Nimueh wrote:Enter seems to be of the false impression that I’m seeking a free pass for being sick and think that should somehow make me immune from votes, which is something I’ve never even suggested.

In post 1059, Nimueh wrote:
In post 1056, tris wrote:VOTE: Nimueh

Anything to say about someone other than NMSA (Or I guess tictac)?

I’ve V/LA because I haven’t been feeling well, so no I’m not caught up yet but if this is your sole reason for for voting me, it isn’t a town one.

VOTE: Tris
Huh.
And in this post she wasn't saying I shouldn't vote for her because she's sick. The sickness was just the reason she wasn't caught up yet.

Thank you. I keep explaining it but neither Enter or NMSA are acknowledging it for some reason.

Nimueh · Post Post #1743 (ISO) » Sun Mar 03, 2019 12:22 pm

In post 1735, NotMySpamAccount wrote:
In post 1731, Nimueh wrote:
In post 1693, NotMySpamAccount wrote:
In post 1692, Nimueh wrote:
In post 1641, NotMySpamAccount wrote:
In post 1639, Brigitte wrote:
In post 1636, skitter30 wrote:ngl i kinda want to vote nimueh; she feels really flat here for her and i'm kinda surprised that she's not scumreading enter here tbh

pedit
WHY ARE YOU ASKING MY OPINION!!!!!!

I DONT TRUST MYSELF RIGHT NOW!!!
chill. regardless of alignment you need to calm down and read isos for reads or something.
don't flail
.
I legit can’t tell anymore if this is bussing or not but you voting me and persisting in ignoring the elephant in the room, is pinging my scumdar off the charts rn.
the elephant in the room being?
You told Brigitte to stop “flailing” or something, which is why I think you two are linked. also that uberweird “course” exchange earlier.
flailing as in posting uselessly about how you can't get a read. the "course" thing was me scumreading her sarcasticly.

So, why isn’t your vote on her then, if you think she’s “flailing”?

NotMySpamAccount · Post Post #1744 (ISO) » Sun Mar 03, 2019 12:23 pm

In post 1743, Nimueh wrote:
In post 1735, NotMySpamAccount wrote:
In post 1731, Nimueh wrote:
In post 1693, NotMySpamAccount wrote:
In post 1692, Nimueh wrote:
In post 1641, NotMySpamAccount wrote:
In post 1639, Brigitte wrote:
In post 1636, skitter30 wrote:ngl i kinda want to vote nimueh; she feels really flat here for her and i'm kinda surprised that she's not scumreading enter here tbh

pedit
WHY ARE YOU ASKING MY OPINION!!!!!!

I DONT TRUST MYSELF RIGHT NOW!!!
chill. regardless of alignment you need to calm down and read isos for reads or something.
don't flail
.
I legit can’t tell anymore if this is bussing or not but you voting me and persisting in ignoring the elephant in the room, is pinging my scumdar off the charts rn.
the elephant in the room being?
You told Brigitte to stop “flailing” or something, which is why I think you two are linked. also that uberweird “course” exchange earlier.
flailing as in posting uselessly about how you can't get a read. the "course" thing was me scumreading her sarcasticly.
So, why isn’t your vote on her then, if you think she’s “flailing”?

because, as I have said, you'rs scummier

Nimueh · Post Post #1745 (ISO) » Sun Mar 03, 2019 12:23 pm

In post 1737, NotMySpamAccount wrote:
In post 1736, Nimueh wrote:
In post 1700, Enter wrote:
In post 1657, Nimueh wrote:You just answered your own question. It wasn’t at all cool what you said and yes, you absolutely do owe me an apology for that.

I don’t engage with anyone who uses mean-spirited attacks on me.
Lol, you attacked me first.

*punches me
*me punches back

I don't talk to people who punch me

Your self-awareness is 0
Where did I attack or “punch” you?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphor

Thank you Captain Obvious?

I know it’s a metaphor.

Nimueh · Post Post #1746 (ISO) » Sun Mar 03, 2019 12:26 pm

In post 1741, NotMySpamAccount wrote:
In post 1740, Nimueh wrote:
In post 1727, Brigitte wrote:
In post 1726, Nimueh wrote:
In post 1686, Brigitte wrote:I don't know what to do with this information.
Don’t threaten me with that or I will seriously consider replacing out.
Why would I threaten you with it?
Good, well I know that NMSA has been pushing for this.

Btw, why are you voting Tictac?
care to explain?

I’m referring to your posts trying to get Skitter or Ank to presumably guess at a possible alternative account for me.

Nimueh · Post Post #1747 (ISO) » Sun Mar 03, 2019 12:27 pm

In post 1744, NotMySpamAccount wrote:
In post 1743, Nimueh wrote:
In post 1735, NotMySpamAccount wrote:
In post 1731, Nimueh wrote:
In post 1693, NotMySpamAccount wrote:
In post 1692, Nimueh wrote:
In post 1641, NotMySpamAccount wrote:
In post 1639, Brigitte wrote:
In post 1636, skitter30 wrote:ngl i kinda want to vote nimueh; she feels really flat here for her and i'm kinda surprised that she's not scumreading enter here tbh

pedit
WHY ARE YOU ASKING MY OPINION!!!!!!

I DONT TRUST MYSELF RIGHT NOW!!!
chill. regardless of alignment you need to calm down and read isos for reads or something.
don't flail
.
I legit can’t tell anymore if this is bussing or not but you voting me and persisting in ignoring the elephant in the room, is pinging my scumdar off the charts rn.
the elephant in the room being?
You told Brigitte to stop “flailing” or something, which is why I think you two are linked. also that uberweird “course” exchange earlier.
flailing as in posting uselessly about how you can't get a read. the "course" thing was me scumreading her sarcasticly.
So, why isn’t your vote on her then, if you think she’s “flailing”?
because, as I have said, you'rs scummier

None of that explains why you thinked we’re linked.

NotMySpamAccount · Post Post #1748 (ISO) » Sun Mar 03, 2019 12:33 pm

In post 1747, Nimueh wrote:
In post 1744, NotMySpamAccount wrote:
In post 1743, Nimueh wrote:
In post 1735, NotMySpamAccount wrote:
In post 1731, Nimueh wrote:
In post 1693, NotMySpamAccount wrote:
In post 1692, Nimueh wrote:
In post 1641, NotMySpamAccount wrote:
In post 1639, Brigitte wrote:
In post 1636, skitter30 wrote:ngl i kinda want to vote nimueh; she feels really flat here for her and i'm kinda surprised that she's not scumreading enter here tbh

pedit
WHY ARE YOU ASKING MY OPINION!!!!!!

I DONT TRUST MYSELF RIGHT NOW!!!
chill. regardless of alignment you need to calm down and read isos for reads or something.
don't flail
.
I legit can’t tell anymore if this is bussing or not but you voting me and persisting in ignoring the elephant in the room, is pinging my scumdar off the charts rn.
the elephant in the room being?
You told Brigitte to stop “flailing” or something, which is why I think you two are linked. also that uberweird “course” exchange earlier.
flailing as in posting uselessly about how you can't get a read. the "course" thing was me scumreading her sarcasticly.
So, why isn’t your vote on her then, if you think she’s “flailing”?
because, as I have said, you'rs scummier
None of that explains why you thinked we’re linked.

I'm not linking you for your interaction together. I'm calling you both scum because you both acted scummy.

northsidegal · Post Post #1749 (ISO) » Sun Mar 03, 2019 12:35 pm