Yes, now get off of me. I was going to wait until it was lylo because I expected scum to make some kind of play and I’d come out catching them that way.In post 2796, Something_Smart wrote:There's... 4 scum?
I lied about the Loyal modifier thing.
Yes, now get off of me. I was going to wait until it was lylo because I expected scum to make some kind of play and I’d come out catching them that way.In post 2796, Something_Smart wrote:There's... 4 scum?
This is a terrible reasoning.In post 2799, Something_Smart wrote:I kind of want to lynch you now just because if we're actually playing a 9:4 game then our loss will be the fault of whoever said this was balanced.
Not really at all. Creature's role would get a total of one result. RCE would only get a result if he died and even then only one.In post 2803, Morality wrote:And there’s a Cop/IC/Disloyal Babysitter, and it’s 3.5 because of a traitor.
So there’s a lot of Inno/Guilty stuff.
I mean, you have a role apparently. I’m sure there are more.In post 2806, Something_Smart wrote:Not really at all. Creature's role would get a total of one result. RCE would only get a result if he died and even then only one.In post 2803, Morality wrote:And there’s a Cop/IC/Disloyal Babysitter, and it’s 3.5 because of a traitor.
So there’s a lot of Inno/Guilty stuff.
9:4 mini normal is so shitty and I will have words for NK15 and the reviewers if it's true. I'd rather focus on the possibility that this is actually a decent game, because I'd happily give up the chance of winning an awful setup for a better chance of winning a good one.In post 2801, Morality wrote:This is a terrible reasoning.In post 2799, Something_Smart wrote:I kind of want to lynch you now just because if we're actually playing a 9:4 game then our loss will be the fault of whoever said this was balanced.
Don’t give up winning an awful setup...win it. Come on, manIn post 2809, Something_Smart wrote:9:4 mini normal is so shitty and I will have words for NK15 and the reviewers if it's true. I'd rather focus on the possibility that this is actually a decent game, because I'd happily give up the chance of winning an awful setup for a better chance of winning a good one.In post 2801, Morality wrote:This is a terrible reasoning.In post 2799, Something_Smart wrote:I kind of want to lynch you now just because if we're actually playing a 9:4 game then our loss will be the fault of whoever said this was balanced.
And my role isn't very strong.
Now you seem convinced that I'm town...?In post 2812, Morality wrote:Don’t give up winning an awful setup...win it. Come on, man
I was talking about role wise.In post 2813, Something_Smart wrote:His last game was 15:4.
You're saying this is 9:4. That's not in the same league of crazy at all.
No, I’d want you to win as scum if you’re scum. You not hard tunneling is a little townie, sure, but I was hard tunneled on Shoshin.In post 2815, Something_Smart wrote:Now you seem convinced that I'm town...?In post 2812, Morality wrote:Don’t give up winning an awful setup...win it. Come on, man
Too much text to read through and pick up on those crumbs.In post 2817, Morality wrote:I’ve been crumbing I was informed for a while
If scum get a mislynch, they only need one more afterwards. They have 3 scum left.In post 2814, Vorkuta wrote:I don't see how smart gets away with such a gambit this early in the game though, Morality.
One day later? Yes- but now?
You're going to have to spoonfeed me otherwise...
I’m an Informed Miller.In post 2819, Vorkuta wrote:Too much text to read through and pick up on those crumbs.In post 2817, Morality wrote:I’ve been crumbing I was informed for a while
What happened to being anasceticmiller?
Would you deny that, from my point of view here, if you are scum, you're absolutely playing to survive as long as possible?In post 2817, Morality wrote:Zero scum motivation. That’s the most anti scum thing ever, and I don’t play anti scum as scum.
Sure, but I’m town, so I know that’s not the case. I’m probably inno’d town as well.In post 2822, Something_Smart wrote:Would you deny that, from my point of view here, if you are scum, you're absolutely playing to survive as long as possible?In post 2817, Morality wrote:Zero scum motivation. That’s the most anti scum thing ever, and I don’t play anti scum as scum.
If I actually got a guilty on you, there's no way you endgame. So your motivation would just be to survive as long as you possibly could and sow confusion in the meantime.
Do you see how this makes sense from my point of view?