Mini 596 - Timesplitters Mafia (Mod Abandoned)

[Empking]

My votes on Roffman is because he was one of the first to go on the Ace bandwagon.

^ I didn't even vote Roffman, the only reason I posted what I did was because I was getting bad vibes from W!nter and I needed to post.

Votecount up to post 75

ace1217 (3) - W!nt3r, Mellowed Man, kabenon007
W!nt3r (2) - thinktank, roffman
Empking (1) - ChannelDelibird
roffman (1) - Empking
Mellowed Man (1) - angelmouse

Not Voting (4) - SlySly, malthusis, GhostWriter, ace1217

[W!nt3r]

LOL and here I though joining a Mini-theme would leave all the noob-mistakes behind.

[angelmouse]

Unvote

Random vote unnecessary now. I will fight the injustice to mice in another way.

Personally I think that Ace's actions are suspicious but not to the degree where it deserves a vote

FOS: Ace

. I do think that those that leapt upon him do deserve a vote so I can keep my vote where it is.

I really don't know what to say but I think w!nter might be guilty but I don't want to change my vote.

My votes on Roffman is because he was one of the first to go on the Ace bandwagon.

^ I didn't even vote Roffman, the only reason I posted what I did was because I was getting bad vibes from W!nter and I needed to post.

Your vote wasn't on Roffman because he was one of the first to put the vote on Ace, it was random. Then you want to keep your vote there but in the same instinct FOS Ace? A tad contradictory since the stage the ace waggon was at was in no way to strong lynch waggon, more a pressure one to get him to say something to back himself up, something you were doing with your FOS.

To then say you find another player guilty (strong word that btw, makes you sound very certain, suspicious or something like that sounds less convicing) with no evidence is strange. When asked for evidence you just say bad vibes? I think more than that is necessary if you want to inplicate a player.

Also if you need to post you can comment on the game, not just finger point if you don't have enough evidence to do that. Everyone gets bad vibes in a game and gut feelings, but you can really only act fully on evidence (exceptions apply of course), something you don't have, or at least haven't posted yet.

FOS: Empking

I'm not a fan of your lack of reasoning for inplicating w!nt3r, so can you explain further please.

LOL and here I though joining a Mini-theme would leave all the noob-mistakes behind.

I totally agree with you. If you are a noobie there is a forum for you there to learn the game. If you come straight to a theme game (not even an open) you cannot use it comepletely as an excuse IMO and you have t realise that. Any mistakes you have here should not be taken in the same way as mistakes in noobie games.

[Empking]

I wouldn't call just mentioning a guilty feeling as really acting on it. I didn't force anyone to give my gut feeling any weight.

My vote is on Roffman for jumping on the Ace bandwagon otherwise it'd be off.

[ChaosOmega]

kabenon007, thinktank, and ace1217 have been prodded.

GhostWriter has 24 hours to post before I begin looking for a replacement.

5:37

[ChannelDelibird]

My vote is on Roffman for jumping on the Ace bandwagon otherwise it'd be off.

You've changed your tune. This is the exact post in which you voted for Roffman:

Vote Roffman

for putting the second random vote on someone.

That definitely reads as random. It certainly doesn't read as a vote against a bandwagoner, especially considering that there wasn't a bandwagon on ace at that point. Indeed, you're voting roffman for putting the second random vote on

me

.

-------------

By my reckoning, we have a deadline for the 1st of June (5 days time). I think we need some more pressure on Empking right about now - angelmouse, your unvote and then only a FoS on Empking is unhelpful. Put your vote where your mouth is.

Confirm vote: Empking

[kabenon007]

Sorry, I've been busy, and this game kinda fell off my radar. I'll reread and post as soon as I can.

[ChannelDelibird]

Christ, come on guys. 4 pages in 2 weeks is ridiculous.

[thinktank]

unvote

W!inter, why is your vote still on Ace. Do you still think that he is scum and why? I honestly think hs move at the beginning was a mistake, why are you still on that argument?

[roffman]

Christ, come on guys. 4 pages in 2 weeks is ridiculous.

I agree, it is quite terrible. Personally, i'm happy with my vote on w!nt3r, as i still his joining and badgering of ace as scummy and oporturistic. i also am seeing empking as scummy, though i'm not quite willing to vote for him yet, seeing as his actions seem to be rational, if a little confused. I agree that his reasons are scummy, but w!nt3r just seems like a much more likely candidate for scum atm. That being said, the cases i have towards both are very small and insignificant, and it wouldn't take much for me to be convinced to change my vote

[GhostWriter]

I apologize for being away from this game. From what I see and my way of thinking, I'm with Channel in pressuring Empking. Empking's attempt to re-explain the vote in a completely different light reeks, and it isn't a town smell that it's giving off.

Vote: Empking

[SlySly]

vote: Mellowed Man

because I think he is scum.

[W!nt3r]

unvote

W!inter, why is your vote still on Ace. Do you still think that he is scum and why? I honestly think hs move at the beginning was a mistake, why are you still on that argument?

You're misreping me.

I am not still on that argument. I still don't want to play with stupid players.

[W!nt3r]

And the fact that you pointed me out of the three votes on him is: SCUMTASTIC

FoS: Thinktank

I can leave my vote on him if I want, when there are people who are yet to appear truly scummy to me. Should I find someone who's scummy qualities outweigh Ace's stupidity. i'll change my vote.

Until then I'm happy with voting the stupid player who can cause more harm to the game than he realizes.

[ace1217]

Empking seems scummy, so I will

Vote empking

[angelmouse]

By my reckoning, we have a deadline for the 1st of June (5 days time). I think we need some more pressure on Empking right about now - angelmouse, your unvote and then only a FoS on Empking is unhelpful. Put your vote where your mouth is.

I never realsied the deadline was so close. Thanks for the reminder. I didn't vote empking before as i felt a FOS would be enough pressure for him to explain himself, but if i had seen the deadline i probably would have voted for pressure.

I wouldn't call just mentioning a guilty feeling as really acting on it. I didn't force anyone to give my gut feeling any weight.

My vote is on Roffman for jumping on the Ace bandwagon otherwise it'd be off.

Not an adequate explaination. In no way did you releave the scummy feelings i was getting from you.

Vote: Empking

Empking seems scummy, so I will Vote empking

LOL, Consider why you find Empking scummy ace and maybe write that in??? Also if it for the reasons I, and other, said above then you have just done exactly the same thing you just voted him for!!! Implicating players with no reason is why i have voted Empking and then you vote for him and don't give any reasons!!!!! Hilarious. "Seems Scummy" is not a reason.

I gave you the benefit of the doubt earlier with your noobie mistake. Now your hoping right onto the most plausible bangwaggon with no reason at all when you critized others for jumping on yours. Your making it hard for me not to just vote for you right out.

Major FOS: Ace

. That will upgrade to a vote later if you fail to answer yourself quickly since the deadline is looming.

[Empking]

Fine

My vote is still on Roffman for jumping on the Ace bandwagon otherwise it'd be off.

Does that make that clearer, though I think my original sentence was clear enough.

Let's say that most people were getting bad vibes from W!nter but they don't know why. Before I posted what I posted we didn't know whether or not that was true and I've seen it work before.

[angelmouse]

Let's say that most people were getting bad vibes from W!nter but they don't know why. Before I posted what I posted we didn't know whether or not that was true and I've seen it work before.

Were most people? Talking for everyone now? You have seen what before? Saying your getting bad vibes on a player, someone else jump in and agree with

better

reasons and more concrete ones and then you say "Yeah that, i'll vote now"? Is that what you mean? You mean to say you let everyone else do the scum hunting and you follow suit.

Nah I don't like that. You actually haven't posted much more than 3 lines in every post and you don't look like your scum hunting at all. Implicating another player, whoever it is, while expecting everyone else to come with the reasons so you can vote sounds very suspicious to me.

I was thinking of out right voting ace for terrible play, but i keep my vote on you Empking for sneaky, but very transparent, bad play.

[Empking]

No, I said we now know that most people don't beleive w!nter's being guilty.

No, what Ii'm talking about is someone saying that they're getting bad vibes from a player. Then another person saying who they're getting bad vibes from. Then another and so on. Then at the end you see if someone is consistently coming up.

You seem to not like what you're pretending I'm saying rather than what I'm actually saying.

Unvote

Vote: Angelmouse

[ChannelDelibird]

Empking, what you're saying is:

a) changing every post you make
b) barely comrephensible in the first place

Now, seeing as you haven't actually addressed the fact that you voted roffman because he was the second player to randomly vote for me yet. I have quoted this once and I will quote it again:

Vote Roffman

for putting the second random vote on someone.

This is definitely not a vote for bandwagon jumping, and it's something you continue to ignore.

Also, how have you managed to go from this:

I really don't know what to say but I think w!nter might be guilty but I don't want to change my vote.

to this:

No, I said we now know that most people don't beleive w!nter's being guilty.

in the space of two or three posts?

Die scum die.

[Empking]

"My votes on Roffman is because he was one of the first to go on the Ace bandwagon. " Tthen to make it clearer to you. My vote is still on Roffman for jumping on the Ace bandwagon otherwise it'd be off.

Yes I went from that because of how everyone else reacted.

[angelmouse]

OMGUS vote for myself because I question what you say...

I am getting bad vibes from you, does that count?

I am not of the opinion that everyone should say who they have bad vibes towards without any concrete reason to have the bad vibes. You could simply not like a name, aviator, posting style and this could lead to "bad vibes" that you can't explain.

You still haven't explained your vibes incidently. Plus i never said I didn't think w!nt3r is guilty or not so you don't know that at all.

[roffman]

unvote vote: Empking

for multiple reasons.
major one is that he seems very scummy, jumping between voting methods and various other things ppl have pointed out.
Secondly, getting close to deadline.
Fourthly, i agree with ChannelDelibird - Die, scum, die

[roffman]

EBWOP

i meant thirdly if u couldn't figure it out

[Empking]

^^^ So I can't vote for you because you voted for me first that doesn't seem very fair.

How many more votes do I need? Should I claim?