In post 2723, northsidegal wrote:In post 2720, Ankamius wrote:@Mod: Is it public knowledge at what stage we will know when NKs are enabled again? I'm referring to like start-of-day vs end-of-dayThere is no such public knowledge.
I wonder what could possibly happen in the gamestate to change this?Until further notice, there will be no night phases.
In post 2724, Ankamius wrote:that sucks
that means we could just get to the end of day 2 and get told that we're suddenly going to have a night 2
In post 2727, Nimueh wrote:In post 2724, Ankamius wrote:that sucks
that means we could just get to the end of day 2 and get told that we're suddenly going to have a night 2@mod, would we be informed of this while still in the day phase, should this occur?
I think this setup is mountainous right? So no tprs in this game. If you are, it would likely mean that your reads are probably on the right track.In post 2726, Ankamius wrote:idc
I feel like I'm the first NK for most scumteams here anyways so I'm just going to assume every day is my last
what makes you think the setup is mountainousIn post 2731, Nimueh wrote:I think this setup is mountainous right? So no tprs in this game. If you are, it would likely mean that your reads are probably on the right track.In post 2726, Ankamius wrote:idc
I feel like I'm the first NK for most scumteams here anyways so I'm just going to assume every day is my last
I assumed you were asking if we would know in advance while I just wondered if we would know the same dayphase, so similar but different.In post 2728, Ankamius wrote:that's essentially what I asked worded differently
Brigitte flip and my role pm. I have no knowledge of any PRs and Brigitte flip, made me think there are none. I guess if we ever flip a PR, it would mean I’m wrong in that case.In post 2733, Ankamius wrote:what makes you think the setup is mountainousIn post 2731, Nimueh wrote:I think this setup is mountainous right? So no tprs in this game. If you are, it would likely mean that your reads are probably on the right track.In post 2726, Ankamius wrote:idc
I feel like I'm the first NK for most scumteams here anyways so I'm just going to assume every day is my last
I have secret accounts because they’re supposed to actually beIn post 2732, Chara wrote:disappointed with that replace-out too.
if you have a secret alt and you're blacklisted by somebody, tell them your secret alt. then you don't end up having them join games you're in and it doesn't become an issue.
that's all i'll say about it. oh, and skitter's town, obviously. as much as i hate to say that for this reason.
In post 2738, Nimueh wrote:I have secret accounts because they’re supposed to actually beIn post 2732, Chara wrote:disappointed with that replace-out too.
if you have a secret alt and you're blacklisted by somebody, tell them your secret alt. then you don't end up having them join games you're in and it doesn't become an issue.
that's all i'll say about it. oh, and skitter's town, obviously. as much as i hate to say that for this reason.secret. And no, my life on this site doesn’t and isn’t going to revolve around Skitter or anyone else for that matter, so suggesting that she had any effect on my doing that is just ridiculous. Sorry, I don’t want to offend you here, just stating facts.
So, no, not my problem.
And I’m reading her replace out as NAI. Should we also tr Xtoxm based on urap’s replace out too?
I can 100% confirm I am not Nancy Drawer 39. Please don’t ask this question of me again in this thread. Kthanx.In post 2739, Creature wrote:Are you Nancy Drawer 39?
I didn't phrase that right. Your surrounding posting looks good enough in a vacuum to let something like your brigette vote slip by.In post 2608, Chara wrote:isn't this the exact opposite of my posting being good in a vacuum? you're looking at one post here, not the gamestate.In post 2573, Flubbernugget wrote:The vote precedes two points on brigette being NAI and a setup to still get tris lynched if that were to become convenient. I think this is a perfect illustration of what I was trying to get at when I said chara's posting looks good in a vacuum. This vote really didn't bring any suspicion to chara at all, but it really should have.
considering one of tris or Brigitte seemed inevitable at that point in the game, why does scum me need to setup on anybody?
I think there's a good chance if scum flips on the brigette wagon that tris is additonally scum. I'm really not sure of whether or not tris is scum, and in the posts you've noted I admitted I am on the fence and it could go both ways.In post 2623, Chara wrote:how likely do you think it is that both wagons were on town?
from your post about me i would guess you think they both are.
at that point, what AI information are you getting from the wagons, when scum would be happy to sit on either?
I don't see much similarity between the posting styles, but the motivations behind the posting reads similar.In post 2627, Chara wrote:good question. 2336 and followup are really weird posts because it's saying that u2 and i need to be the same alignment because we have superficially similar posting styles?
Objectively falseIn post 2635, Ankamius wrote:Flubbernugget isn't making any particular pushes on his own that he intends to go anywhere.
Flubbernugget is mostly following lynches.
I'm sorting between chara and succint right now!In post 2635, Ankamius wrote:Flubbernuggets only 'push' is on the Xtoxm slot, and a cursory look shows that Urap2 isn't making any particular push that goes anywhere, the only time he votes with Flubber or Nimueh is on the original NMSA wagon, and I have to remember that Urap2 made a pretty dramatic shift in reads to account for him suddenly leaving the wagon.
I'm looking for scum between you and succinct at the moment. Has that not been clear?
Still trying to sort where I think scum was on the wagon. Chara had posting I could actually sort through. Succinct did not.In post 2711, skitter30 wrote:why exactly are you voting succinct?