Micro 857: Burden of Proficiency Mafia

singletonking · Post Post #950 (ISO) » Thu Mar 14, 2019 10:21 pm

I'm currently getting strong scumvibes from one player but I need to make sure it's not a playstyle clash

Michael Scott · Post Post #951 (ISO) » Thu Mar 14, 2019 10:21 pm

In post 779, Michael Scott wrote:Does town Shoshin push for a quick lynch on my slot being "underwhelming" when I've not been posting as a whole?

RC, Shoshin has also done this. ^

Michael Scott · Post Post #952 (ISO) » Thu Mar 14, 2019 10:22 pm

In post 684, Shoshin wrote:Boring.

In post 685, Shoshin wrote:Let's lynch MS.

In post 686, Shoshin wrote:Auro/Volxen are never this underwhelming.

Even if not voting, suggesting it.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #953 (ISO) » Thu Mar 14, 2019 10:23 pm

I regret not inning as paragon but I had the mental image that if I did we'd get a super stupid town like the one in branching paths and get a page 2 or 3 hammer on town and leave us no real way to solve

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #954 (ISO) » Thu Mar 14, 2019 10:24 pm

In post 951, Michael Scott wrote:
In post 779, Michael Scott wrote:Does town Shoshin push for a quick lynch on my slot being "underwhelming" when I've not been posting as a whole?
RC, Shoshin has also done this. ^

I am aware of this

Congratulations on being the sole slot who hasn't tried to lynch someone without buy in from me

You immediately receive 50 Shrute bucks

singletonking · Post Post #955 (ISO) » Thu Mar 14, 2019 10:24 pm

Town won both subgames in branching

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #956 (ISO) » Thu Mar 14, 2019 10:25 pm

In post 955, singletonking wrote:Town won both subgames in branching

Congratulations on that

Doesn't mean that the hammer wasn't stupid as hell

Michael Scott · Post Post #957 (ISO) » Thu Mar 14, 2019 10:25 pm

In post 693, u r a person 2 wrote:and ms being scummy for the whole im caught up but unaware of things that have happened

I dismantled this and yet he scumreads me for this.
I said I'll catch up.
I asked a question.
Shoshin said she asked it already.
I said alright, might have missed it because I skimmed.

He's pulling an inconsistency from nowhere, not heeding my rebuttal.

Michael Scott · Post Post #958 (ISO) » Thu Mar 14, 2019 10:26 pm

In post 954, RadiantCowbells wrote:Congratulations on being the sole slot who hasn't tried to lynch someone without buy in from me

You immediately receive 50 Shrute bucks

Would be damn hypocritical for me to in any case, considering I'm just getting into the game.

Yay! I give you a million Stanley nickels in turn.

Saudade · Post Post #959 (ISO) » Thu Mar 14, 2019 11:46 pm

VOTE: unvote
i mean im going to vote this in the end anyway but there boys

Saudade · Post Post #960 (ISO) » Thu Mar 14, 2019 11:47 pm

i dont think i expressed any intention to end the game early either.. this is a bit of a stretch rc

Saudade · Post Post #961 (ISO) » Thu Mar 14, 2019 11:47 pm

how curious

Saudade · Post Post #962 (ISO) » Thu Mar 14, 2019 11:50 pm

I dont really like players who are suspicious of everyone and no one at the same time

u r a person 2 · Post Post #963 (ISO) » Fri Mar 15, 2019 12:19 am

In post 754, Michael Scott wrote:Sorry for my snappiness, I'm just a bit annoyed at the gamestate. I'll be here for a while but will get busy again (it's already a pain in the ass typing with a splint), if my incapability in posting is a detriment to you guys to properly solve the game, I'll replace out.

=/

u r a person 2 · Post Post #964 (ISO) » Fri Mar 15, 2019 12:36 am

In post 901, Saudade wrote:
In post 898, Michael Scott wrote:Was RC refraining from speed lynching a towntell for you?
this question is stupid

whats the point of asking about towntells that are really
REALLY
easy to fake

In post 902, Michael Scott wrote:I'm wondering if Enter has a bad read. I've already established that fails to be a town tell.

In post 903, Michael Scott wrote:He was under the impression that scum could speedlynch and win.

from your perspective, enter's recent line of thinking is obviously bad. This entire question and response to saudade reads fake af

u r a person 2 · Post Post #965 (ISO) » Fri Mar 15, 2019 12:37 am

In post 907, RadiantCowbells wrote:Enter is fine to flip town if it solves the game for him

I am not

I absolutely fucking loathe urap trying to railroad me when I was drunk, and I want the chance to discuss it with him and sort him and what not and we don't get that by rushing the game

gtfo with the whole railroad shit. I asked to lynch, you were like no not til im sober. i unvote. you say, hey I'm functional now, so I bring it up, and then you're somehow drunk again and i drop it

i don't understand the need for the over the top language

u r a person 2 · Post Post #966 (ISO) » Fri Mar 15, 2019 12:40 am

In post 922, RadiantCowbells wrote:I'm intensely sketched out by the fact that both Saudade and URAP tried to look for an early end to the day

you got us

as S+S we decided to both make a push at a quick lynch while the other was not online

brilliant work, rc

u r a person 2 · Post Post #967 (ISO) » Fri Mar 15, 2019 12:41 am

In post 925, RadiantCowbells wrote:
In post 923, singletonking wrote:Why is Saudade scum
I think that URAP is scum who was trying to abuse my being intoxicated to score an easy mislynch on MS and then when that failed Saudade tried to get MS to help score a mislynch on Shoshin.

this is not a thing you believe. this is you posturing as whatever the fuck alignment you are

u r a person 2 · Post Post #968 (ISO) » Fri Mar 15, 2019 12:43 am

In post 927, RadiantCowbells wrote:Basically

I don't want to have to sort Saudade / Shoshin at this point

I'm fairly happy saying that the negative feelings URAP gave me were probably because he's scum now that I've looked at how he tried to finesse me today. But Saudade is seeking to make the game about him/Shoshin in a situation where the other scum is obviously easier to resolve.

Again, this doesn't work if you don't townread me.

like the only reason this bullshit doesn't reverse my read on you is because you also hard scum read me in the vengecop that just ended. You were wrong there. You're probably wrong!town here

u r a person 2 · Post Post #969 (ISO) » Fri Mar 15, 2019 12:44 am

In post 933, RadiantCowbells wrote:And I get more mileage out of all this talking to urap than anyone else so I wanna do that

im here for 15 more minutes then gone for a few hrs

u r a person 2 · Post Post #970 (ISO) » Fri Mar 15, 2019 12:47 am

In post 957, Michael Scott wrote:
In post 693, u r a person 2 wrote:and ms being scummy for the whole im caught up but unaware of things that have happened
I dismantled this and yet he scumreads me for this.
I said I'll catch up.
I asked a question.
Shoshin said she asked it already.
I said alright, might have missed it because I skimmed.

He's pulling an inconsistency from nowhere, not heeding my rebuttal.

you haven't dismantled it. yes, it happened as you described above, but that doesn't stop it from being scummy.

Michael Scott · Post Post #971 (ISO) » Fri Mar 15, 2019 1:29 am

In post 964, u r a person 2 wrote:from your perspective, enter's recent line of thinking is obviously bad. This entire question and response to saudade reads fake af

Enter's line of thinking re: scumread on **me** is obviously bad.
His line of thinking re: RC would be bad if this was the basis for it, and would push him to start re-evaluating there.
Even with different win-cons, he's incentivized to find scum as that should give him an auto win, and it's therefore good to communicate and sort out reads.

Calling something fake is the cheapest attack you can make, plus that you're attacking without bothering to engage with me points to it being in bad faith.

Michael Scott · Post Post #972 (ISO) » Fri Mar 15, 2019 1:30 am

In post 970, u r a person 2 wrote:you haven't dismantled it. yes, it happened as you described above, but that doesn't stop it from being scummy.

So you admit you're pushing that skimming == scummy?

Michael Scott · Post Post #973 (ISO) » Fri Mar 15, 2019 1:58 am

In post 968, u r a person 2 wrote:like the only reason this bullshit doesn't reverse my read on you is because you also hard scum read me in the vengecop that just ended. You were wrong there. You're probably wrong!town here

I'm also getting more confident in town!RC + scum!URAP from this.
RC, I know you want to get townread anyway; but look at the progression of URAP's read on you, ultimately to this: that he *would* scumread you but finds a reason not to.
Talk about unnatural.

u r a person 2 · Post Post #974 (ISO) » Fri Mar 15, 2019 2:26 am

In post 972, Michael Scott wrote:
In post 970, u r a person 2 wrote:you haven't dismantled it. yes, it happened as you described above, but that doesn't stop it from being scummy.
So you admit you're pushing that skimming == scummy?

How many times are you going to misrep this?

I'm pushing that claiming to have caught up without actually catching up is scummy