Strike one was the whole page for yourself. You don't look like a silly player; even if you explicitly said "I should try doing it", it felt like Mark Zuckerberg trying to act like a human being.
Strike two was the tone of some posts:
158 felt like buddying (and since I don't consider you a goofy kind of guy, that post doesn't seem like following Vedith's townbloc joke);
191 followed by
216 it's really odd. First, you join a wagon without giving much reasons other than "let's see where this goes". That alone is not enough to be scummy, since joining a wagon is pretty common. But then, when I give my reasoning for unvoting, you call me out for doing it? Seems inconsistent, joining a wagon with not many reasons but calling someone out for leaving the wagon; it's like you wanted a lynch for the sake of it and not because you thought Allo was a good lynch.
And strike three was your previous post. You said "this is probably a town post. Scum probably wouldn't want to sacrifice themselves or pretend to be willing to". The double use of "probably" shows that you're not taking stances, or in other words, fencesitting. Is it or isn't a town post? Would scum do that or not? You're not saying it, you're just saying that the post could be from town, and that seems like trying to apeace BEF who clearly wrote that post to get townread.
So that's it. Any questions?
