Mini Normal 2066: Catloaves [Game Over!]

ChibiBear · Post Post #75 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 12:19 am

VOTE COUNT 1.02

Locke113

(3): Lovebird, PenguinPower, Not_Mafia

nomnomnom

(3): rosterfoster, u r a person 2, Locke113

insomnia

(1): Alacrity

u r a person 2

(1): GrandWazoo

PenguinPower

(1): insomnia

Lovebird

(1): themilkcartonkid

Not_Mafia

(1): nomnomnom

With

11

alive, it takes

6

to lynch.

Day 1 ends in

(expired on 2019-03-31 11:00:00)

u r a person 2 · Post Post #76 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 12:23 am

In post 74, Locke113 wrote:Do you usually ask for permission to join a wagon?

It is possible that I have asked a similar question before, but I can't think of one, so let's go with No.

Permission is not the word I would use though. I asked PP for his opinion on where my vote should be.

nomnomnom · Post Post #77 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 12:27 am

In post 74, Locke113 wrote:
Seriously, more wagons with more than 1 vote please, need to turn up the heat in here

Did you join my wagon simply to increase its size or do you have read-related reasons? You have reacted to my posts after voting me.

themilkcartonkid · Post Post #78 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:50 am

I like Lockes questions, and this sounds stilted

In post 76, u r a person 2 wrote:
In post 74, Locke113 wrote:Do you usually ask for permission to join a wagon?
It is possible that I have asked a similar question before, but I can't think of one, so let's go with No.

Permission is not the word I would use though. I asked PP for his opinion on where my vote should be.

I dont know if this is due to being carefully planned out as scum or it's just the tone they type with

rosterfoster · Post Post #79 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 2:15 am

I’ve played with town URAP before. Tone was similar.

Can we all just lynch nomnom?

ISO · Post Post #80 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 2:16 am

Why nom^3?

rosterfoster · Post Post #81 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 2:18 am

In post 77, nomnomnom wrote:Did you join my wagon simply to increase its size or do you have read-related reasons? You have reacted to my posts after voting me.

-Question’s whether vote has reasons
-Immedkately states that saw reasons, but tried to discredit them for non-reason.

rosterfoster · Post Post #82 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 2:19 am

In post 72, nomnomnom wrote:is it really sheeping if he hasn't voted Locke? I feel you're jumping the gun here.

Overly cautious about a non-wagon, tried to dissuade it (probs for town credit).

rosterfoster · Post Post #83 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 2:20 am

In post 30, nomnomnom wrote:Voting the only person you know?
Isn't that a bit counter-intuitive?

Pointless question with some fluff added on from nervous-scum.

ISO · Post Post #84 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 2:44 am

I feel all of those are valid responses.

Sorry - not seeing scum intent there.

nomnomnom · Post Post #85 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 2:49 am

In post 81, rosterfoster wrote:
In post 77, nomnomnom wrote:Did you join my wagon simply to increase its size or do you have read-related reasons? You have reacted to my posts after voting me.

-Question’s whether vote has reasons
-Immedkately states that saw reasons, but tried to discredit them for non-reason.

I'm simply asking for clarity instead of assuming intent. Assuming intent has caused me a lot of problems and pointless arguments before, so I will not make that mistake on this site.

In post 82, rosterfoster wrote:
In post 72, nomnomnom wrote:is it really sheeping if he hasn't voted Locke? I feel you're jumping the gun here.
Overly cautious about a non-wagon, tried to dissuade it (probs for town credit).

That was not dissuasion. I simply felt that accusing someone of sheeping when they haven't done so is odd.
Besides, even if that was the case, how is dissuading a vote giving me town credit? You clearly think I'm scum for it.

In post 83, rosterfoster wrote:
In post 30, nomnomnom wrote:Voting the only person you know?
Isn't that a bit counter-intuitive?
Pointless question with some fluff added on from nervous-scum.

Question was a bit pointless and more curiosity, but I don't see the nervous part?

Overall I feel like you gut-read me as scum but that you're trying to find reasons for it. It feels incredibly forced.

u r a person 2 · Post Post #86 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 3:02 am

In post 78, themilkcartonkid wrote:I like Lockes questions, and this sounds stilted

In post 76, u r a person 2 wrote:
In post 74, Locke113 wrote:Do you usually ask for permission to join a wagon?
It is possible that I have asked a similar question before, but I can't think of one, so let's go with No.

Permission is not the word I would use though. I asked PP for his opinion on where my vote should be.
I dont know if this is due to being carefully planned out as scum or it's just the tone they type with

My completed games are all listed on my wiki (button under my avatar)

Why don't you go find out?

Locke113 · Post Post #87 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 3:45 am

In post 76, u r a person 2 wrote: It is possible that I have asked a similar question before, but I can't think of one, so let's go with No.

Permission is not the word I would use though. I asked PP for his opinion on where my vote should be.

Fair enough

In post 77, nomnomnom wrote: Did you join my wagon simply to increase its size or do you have read-related reasons? You have reacted to my posts after voting me.

Read-related

themilkcartonkid · Post Post #88 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 6:08 am

In post 86, u r a person 2 wrote:
In post 78, themilkcartonkid wrote:I like Lockes questions, and this sounds stilted

In post 76, u r a person 2 wrote:
In post 74, Locke113 wrote:Do you usually ask for permission to join a wagon?
It is possible that I have asked a similar question before, but I can't think of one, so let's go with No.

Permission is not the word I would use though. I asked PP for his opinion on where my vote should be.
I dont know if this is due to being carefully planned out as scum or it's just the tone they type with
My completed games are all listed on my wiki (button under my avatar)

Why don't you go find out?

Because I dont have the time and because I can get responses like this

In post 79, rosterfoster wrote:I’ve played with town URAP before. Tone was similar.

Can we all just lynch nomnom?

I'll believe it for now

u r a person 2 · Post Post #89 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:08 pm

I'm liking roster for town I think

posts are bold and strong, like one with dinosaurs in their genes

ISO · Post Post #90 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:11 pm

Which ones are bold and strong?

ISO · Post Post #91 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:12 pm

Lovebird and n_m are concerning me.

Lovebird especially.

ISO · Post Post #92 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:12 pm

I think I may need a new wagon.

u r a person 2 · Post Post #93 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:13 pm

In post 79, rosterfoster wrote:I’ve played with town URAP before. Tone was similar.

Can we all just lynch nomnom?

okay this is the only one that's actually bold and strong on its own, but the whole iso,

-slapping down an rvs vote
-reaffirming that vote and calling for a lynch by post 80ish
-and then slapping down three reasons (whether you agree with them or not)

I consider it bold

ISO · Post Post #94 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:13 pm

Hmm...

Should we lynch nom^3?

rosterfoster · Post Post #95 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:15 pm

In post 93, u r a person 2 wrote:I consider it bold

But is it strong?

rosterfoster · Post Post #96 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:15 pm

In post 94, PenguinPower wrote:Should we lynch nom^3?

Yayaya.

u r a person 2 · Post Post #97 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:16 pm

I mean, I don't think lynching right now is necessarily the

best

play

But I'm game to see nom hammered right now, yeah.

ISO · Post Post #98 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:24 pm

In post 97, u r a person 2 wrote:But I'm game to see nom hammered right now, yeah.

Why? If it's not the best play.

nomnomnom · Post Post #99 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:27 pm

I feel something is off with the way urap and roster interact. Like, way off. I don't like this.