Mini Normal 2066: Catloaves [Game Over!]

ISO · Post Post #100 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:30 pm

What is it that you don't like?

ISO · Post Post #101 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:31 pm

solid pagetop pp.

very well done.

nomnomnom · Post Post #102 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:36 pm

I can't exactly put it into words but like, having someone be like

"This person is scum here are the three posts that prove it pls lynch right now pls pls pls" a hundred posts in the game then have someone say
"VERY BOLD AND BRAVE! LET'S LYNCH THEM RIGHT NOW EVEN IF IT'S NOT THE BEST PLAY IN MY MIND!"

is just weird. I literally can't describe it any other way than exaggerating the posts, but yeah, I feel something's wrong in there.

ISO · Post Post #103 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:38 pm

How else do you suggest we move from a low info stage to a more serious stage where real reads are developed?

u r a person 2 · Post Post #104 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:38 pm

In post 98, PenguinPower wrote:
In post 97, u r a person 2 wrote:But I'm game to see nom hammered right now, yeah.
Why? If it's not the best play.

Sometimes its fun to buck the system and just let let loose, man

Are you picking up what I'm putting down, PP?

u r a person 2 · Post Post #105 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:39 pm

In post 102, nomnomnom wrote:"VERY BOLD AND BRAVE! LET'S LYNCH THEM RIGHT NOW EVEN IF IT'S NOT THE BEST PLAY IN MY MIND!"

I feel like you're presenting me in the voice of Dr. Worm =P

nomnomnom · Post Post #106 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:40 pm

It's not really about pushing reads, BWs, lynches and whatnot, it's the way they talk specifically rather than what's being said that struck me as ultra weird.

nomnomnom · Post Post #107 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:42 pm

Should probably have quoted there lol, was talking to PP.

ISO · Post Post #108 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:42 pm

In post 105, u r a person 2 wrote:
In post 102, nomnomnom wrote:"VERY BOLD AND BRAVE! LET'S LYNCH THEM RIGHT NOW EVEN IF IT'S NOT THE BEST PLAY IN MY MIND!"
I feel like you're presenting me in the voice of Dr. Worm =P

URAPRASONTOO!!!!

dont MISTEAK! THREENOM is not DR WORM!

ISO · Post Post #109 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:43 pm

In post 104, u r a person 2 wrote:
In post 98, PenguinPower wrote:
In post 97, u r a person 2 wrote:But I'm game to see nom hammered right now, yeah.
Why? If it's not the best play.
Sometimes its fun to buck the system and just let let loose, man

Are you picking up what I'm putting down, PP?

Don't seem to be really.

ISO · Post Post #110 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:43 pm

In post 106, nomnomnom wrote:It's not really about pushing reads, BWs, lynches and whatnot, it's the way they talk specifically rather than what's being said that struck me as ultra weird.

Noted.

u r a person 2 · Post Post #111 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:47 pm

In post 109, PenguinPower wrote:Don't seem to be really.

ugh

then in all seriousness, I'm aware that we're not going to lynch anyone rn, so I'm not actually worried about making the less good play in this scenario

and I'm in a good mood tonight, so I had some fun with it

ISO · Post Post #112 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:48 pm

Oh...I was looking for something different.

Makes sense.

ISO · Post Post #113 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:49 pm

VOTE: insomnia

I think this is a good vote.

u r a person 2 · Post Post #114 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:50 pm

I'll get behind that

VOTE: insomnia

nomnomnom · Post Post #115 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:51 pm

In post 113, PenguinPower wrote:VOTE: insomnia

I think this is a good vote.

You said n_m and lovebird were concerning you a few post backs, why are you voting insomnia over these two people?

ISO · Post Post #116 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 1:51 pm

Because they are not D1 sorts for me.

nomnomnom · Post Post #117 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 2:05 pm

Okay I wanna lay down my thoughts rn because a lot is going through my head after a quick rereading.

- urap has felt a lot less like town these last messages. Not sure what that would say about roster though.
- Really haven't liked Alac's messages on second read, especially that interaction with PP. Rubs me the wrong way.
- I honestly can't read PP. He's fairly non-committal and asks a lot of questions, but I'm not confident on placing my final thoughts on him just yet.
- I like Locke after hearing him today.

I'm hesitating between an urap and insomnia vote, right now.

ISO · Post Post #118 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 2:06 pm

In post 117, nomnomnom wrote:I honestly can't read PP.

This is probably town.

Alacrity · Post Post #119 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 2:09 pm

In post 71, GrandWazoo wrote:
In post 56, u r a person 2 wrote:
In post 55, PenguinPower wrote:I'm less happy about three votes on Locke and lots of one-vote vanity wagons.

I also get bad gut feels from the above.
Should I jump on locke with you?
My gut and experience tells me urap isn't this sheep-y as town.

VOTE: urap

Hello! Do you have any experience with u r a person 2 from before this game?

In post 73, Locke113 wrote:VOTE: nomnomnom

I like this vote, the nomnomnom post before it was not very good.

In post 74, Locke113 wrote:
In post 26, Alacrity wrote:Good morning! I look forward to playing with all of you today. =)

VOTE: insomnia

In post 29, themilkcartonkid wrote:VOTE: lovebird because I dont know anyone else
Like half the players in this game had already voted at this point and neither of you voted on someone with a vote already on them. Just why?

Seriously, more wagons with more than 1 vote please, need to turn up the heat in here

In post 50, nomnomnom wrote:It's like "out of all the people you could vote you pick that one person you know! Why???"

In post 54, nomnomnom wrote: Well, I like your logic and questions so far. It feels genuine. I think what you're asking is good for town in general, and it's putting me at ease to have someone ask me what I think since it's my first game in here. I'm feeling strong town vibes from you.
Hmmmm
In post 56, u r a person 2 wrote: Should I jump on locke with you?
Do you usually ask for permission to join a wagon?

Why do we need more wagons?

In post 82, rosterfoster wrote:
In post 72, nomnomnom wrote:is it really sheeping if he hasn't voted Locke? I feel you're jumping the gun here.
Overly cautious about a non-wagon, tried to dissuade it (probs for town credit).

This looks town to me!

In post 91, PenguinPower wrote:Lovebird and n_m are concerning me.

Lovebird especially.

Is this because they are on the same wagon as you, or for other reasons? It is confusing to me when you later say this about them.

In post 116, PenguinPower wrote:Because they are not D1 sorts for me.

Speaking of which.

In post 103, PenguinPower wrote:How else do you suggest we move from a low info stage to a more serious stage where real reads are developed?

This post doesn't look like a real thought to me!

UNVOTE: Insomnia
VOTE: PenguinPower

ISO · Post Post #120 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 2:11 pm

How does them concerning me relate at all to being D1 sorts?

Also, it doesn't look like a real thought because it wasn't. It was a question.

ISO · Post Post #121 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 2:12 pm

Noting the timing of the insomnia unvote though.

nomnomnom · Post Post #122 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 2:13 pm

Alac, do you appear every time someone mentions your name or how does it work? Weird timing

ISO · Post Post #123 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 2:13 pm

While also joining insomnia on my wagon.

ISO · Post Post #124 (ISO) » Wed Mar 20, 2019 2:14 pm

In post 122, nomnomnom wrote:Alac, do you appear every time someone mentions your name or how does it work? Weird timing

We call that Betelgeuse.