i don't understand how 66 is meant to be forced.
how is it omgus? because I voted someone who voted for me previously?In post 1234, Enter wrote:Actual OMGUSIn post 137, Ausuka wrote:The reason I asked was because I can't follow the progression of "this could be town and this could be scum" then a vote. Like that's the definition of null and I know she said "I think it could be scum" but I don't really know how much confidence that's meant to convey and it altogether came across as non-comittal. Also I am literally voting the same person as light so why do you think I'm derailing the push that was exactly the same push as hers?In post 127, Dunnstral wrote:Asking someone for how confident they are so early feels like it weakens someone elses push rather than sort out readsIf you think this why didn't you say anything before Dunnstral posted?In post 130, light_ganski wrote:^This. Who has a confident scum read on page 3?In post 127, Dunnstral wrote:Asking someone for how confident they are so early feels like it weakens someone elses push rather than sort out reads
It feels like derailment tactic if anything
VOTE: lightganski
why is changing my vote often bad?In post 1234, Enter wrote:Spoiler: Ausuka exclusively changing her vote almost every post in her ISO
sorry for the spoiler messup; i've tried to fix it and can't figure out how to do it and don't think it's too important.