If I can choose me, then I choose me to pick me.In post 694, RCEnigma wrote:Ddl if you had to choose one person as a rep, and this rep is the person that got to choose who they wanted to be in the AP. Who would you choose?
What do you mean?In post 702, northsidegal wrote:i wonder if i'll ever get any credit around here?
That's what you are doing. You're saying "In post 698, northsidegal wrote:I'm not sure what you mean by "assuming the position of scum.In post 692, insomnia wrote:You're assuming the position of scum. Why do that as town?
Yes, I understand your plan... there's no reason to repeat it. I've already told you my thoughts on it.Again, to clear any confusion. We send NSG today. RC pushes a second person. When that person is at L-2, RC gets dayvigged and it proves his read on NSG was pure and his push on the second target for AP as well. We have 2 towns in and then lynch the third if it comes to LyLo.
I already answered his question regarding the plan in 666. (he asked me about it again afterwards anyways)In post 693, DrDolittle wrote:680 doesn't answer why the plan is bad. 687 answers it... kind of tangentially
i understand this completely. what i'm saying is that i am town if rc flips town and i am town if rc does not flip town. shooting rc might make some people more comfortable with the idea that i'm town, but i don't think it should be necessary.In post 708, insomnia wrote:The main idea is that RC is a good town player and an active one and if we can confirm his role, we can prove his reads were genuine.
In post 710, insomnia wrote:Or, to be more exact "Just because RC flips whatever, it doesn't mean I'm town"
that's completely backwards. what i'm saying is that regardless of what RC flips, i'm town. not that... RC flipping town wouldn't confirm me as town or something. it is true that RC being town would, probabilistically speaking, indicate that i am town. my point is that i do not believe it to beIn post 711, insomnia wrote:At least that's what I got from it, correct me if I'm wrong.
I think the majority of the site thinks you are an excellent player. and this game included?In post 705, northsidegal wrote:i mean, i always try to stay humble, but i think i'm fairly decent. pretty good, even, at least looking at the numbers when it comes to my won games.
nobody else seems to think so.
that's rife with conf bias. you can say you are town but we don't know it?In post 712, northsidegal wrote:i understand this completely. what i'm saying is that i am town if rc flips town and i am town if rc does not flip town. shooting rc might make some people more comfortable with the idea that i'm town, but i don't think it should be necessary.
my response is that A will never happen because i know it to be the case. even still, i think you're underrepresenting what i said – my point is also one of opportunity cost. i believe RC to be town, so the opportunity cost of shooting him to confirm me as town (something which i believe to be unnecessary given what is gained) is that we aren't shooting someone whom i believe could be scum.In post 706, DrDolittle wrote:Insomnia's plan is, to prevent A, we should do B. Then he asks, is B a good plan against A. Your response in 666 is A will never happen, therefore we don't need B. Here might be dicey, but I don't think it's a full answer.
actually I don't think I played a town game with you so I'm just going along with what other people sayIn post 714, northsidegal wrote:i don't get that feeling. maybe that's just me, though.
Hi!In post 716, northsidegal wrote:my response is that A will never happen because i know it to be the case. even still, i think you're underrepresenting what i said – my point is also one of opportunity cost. i believe RC to be town, so the opportunity cost of shooting him to confirm me as town (something which i believe to be unnecessary given what is gained) is that we aren't shooting someone whom i believe could be scum.
This is stupid and rife to WIFOM suggestionsIn post 718, insomnia wrote:Realistically speaking, he's probably getting nkd if he's town. If he's not getting nkd, that should even raise more suspicion on him being scum. With him leading town like he is, he presents a threat to scum. The whole idea of my plan revolved around RC staying alive, which would raise his percentage of being scum.
It's not confirmation bias to state something which I know to be factually correct.In post 715, DrDolittle wrote:that's rife with conf bias. you can say you are town but we don't know it?In post 712, northsidegal wrote:i understand this completely. what i'm saying is that i am town if rc flips town and i am town if rc does not flip town. shooting rc might make some people more comfortable with the idea that i'm town, but i don't think it should be necessary.
you've played a scumgame with me, though. any thoughts on that? i know you already said once that i'm posting here more than i have there (while i'm on v/la right now.. hmm...)In post 717, DrDolittle wrote:actually I don't think I played a town game with you so I'm just going along with what other people sayIn post 714, northsidegal wrote:i don't get that feeling. maybe that's just me, though.
In post 721, RCEnigma wrote:If town is talking about vigging RC then scum don't have to nk him. Town is gonna don't for them.
took the words out of my mouth.In post 722, DrDolittle wrote:This is stupid and rife to WIFOM suggestionsIn post 718, insomnia wrote:Realistically speaking, he's probably getting nkd if he's town. If he's not getting nkd, that should even raise more suspicion on him being scum. With him leading town like he is, he presents a threat to scum. The whole idea of my plan revolved around RC staying alive, which would raise his percentage of being scum.
![:]](./images/smilies/icon_smiling.png "Cheerful Smile"){kind=icon}