Mini 2065 - Access Point [Endgame]
Forum rules
- insomnia
-
insomnia Jack of All Trades
- insomnia
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6130
- Joined: March 8, 2019
- Location: your pocket
- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
I did actually agree with having a game plan, though at the time I believe DDL wasn't completely on board with RC's plan and since I have no experience with this setup before I didn't actually know whose idea was better so tried, and failed, to think of a compromise.In post 755, LabRat01 wrote:
Feels off, mostly tonallyIn post 102, Locke113 wrote: Not familiar with this sort of setup so forgive me if this is a stupid idea, but is there some kind of middle ground here where we select a 3-person bloc d1 then d2 we have a discussion on whether the majority still agree and proceed from there?
If RC is town that would kinda be playing nonoptimally not putting himself forward since he knows for def he's town
Agreed
Damn you caught me
The first part seems a bit too compliant. I might have misunderstood the post, but it kinda feels like Locke doesn’t 100% agree with having a game-plan, but is hesitant to post any decisive opinions. It isn’t usually a good scumtell, especially for newbies and people who lack self confidence, but it still doesn’t feel good.
Actually, that ^ applies to the whole post.
Is it bad that I think he wouldn’t have enough guts to defend/support RC like that if they were SvS?In post 102, Locke113 wrote: If RC is town that would kinda be playing nonoptimally not putting himself forward since he knows for def he's town
He hasn’t pushed anyone and his posts make me feel like he might be hesitant to do anything on his own, so I wouldn’t expect a bold, scum-wincon pushes from him…
It feels like SvT to me at most
But anyway, this post feels a bit passive as well. The post doesn’t add anything to the game and it doesn’t seem like Locke wanted to apply this reasoning to anyone else, sowhatsthepointofwritingthat.
@Locke, have you elaborated on the read o Rui already? If no, elaborate, if yes, quote please
Also was I defending RC? I didn't feel like I was. Nor do I feel any need to since I'm not his mother and he's a much better player than I am so what would be the point?
The passiveness is partially explained in my 2nd to last post. Still not sure whether I'm replacing out or not, think I might stick to end of D1 and if I'm still not feeling this game then I'm gone.
As for Rui, I don't think I did elaborate as no one asked me to until now. Also no longer getting scummy vibes and actually quite liked her most recent posts- insomnia
-
insomnia Jack of All Trades
- insomnia
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6130
- Joined: March 8, 2019
- Location: your pocket
Well, I said my posts were bs. Trying to respond to your questions regarding my bs posts would be in a way that is bs as well, and I don’t want to bs you, I like you, you’re reasonableIn post 773, LabRat01 wrote:pffffffffffffffffffffffffft xD
alt-slipping like a pro
The ones I responded to (758, 759, 761)In post 768, hammy wrote:
Yes, any post <500 is bs.In post 767, LabRat01 wrote:
does that mean the previous posts weren't serious?In post 764, insomnia wrote:As a reference point, post 500 and above would be where you should look at if you want to see me play serious.
and can you answer my posts if you haven't already (if I'm the first one to ask about that)?
What posts?
talk to me about it
and why did you write them if you were aware that they're bullshit?
ok...?insomnia wrote:When you get to my post where I make that plan, please tell me you can at least understand what I mean- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
- insomnia
-
insomnia Jack of All Trades
- insomnia
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6130
- Joined: March 8, 2019
- Location: your pocket
- insomnia
-
insomnia Jack of All Trades
- insomnia
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 6130
- Joined: March 8, 2019
- Location: your pocket
- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
- Locke113
-
Locke113 Goon
- Locke113
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 234
- Joined: July 2, 2017
- Location: UK
- LabRat01
-
LabRat01 Goon
- LabRat01
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 804
- Joined: November 5, 2018
Let me put it that way, (if I remember it correctly) you saying that “RC should push himself to AC” was the first read-like game-progressive post you wrote.In post 776, Locke113 wrote:
Also was I defending RC? I didn't feel like I was. Nor do I feel any need to since I'm not his mother and he's a much better player than I am so what would be the point?LabRat01 wrote:
Is it bad that I think he wouldn’t have enough guts to defend/support RC like that if they were SvS?In post 102, Locke113 wrote: If RC is town that would kinda be playing nonoptimally not putting himself forward since he knows for def he's town
He hasn’t pushed anyone and his posts make me feel like he might be hesitant to do anything on his own, so I wouldn’t expect a bold, scum-wincon pushes from him…
It feels like SvT to me at most
But anyway, this post feels a bit passive as well. The post doesn’t add anything to the game and it doesn’t seem like Locke wanted to apply this reasoning to anyone else, sowhatsthepointofwritingthat.
The passiveness is partially explained in my 2nd to last post. Still not sure whether I'm replacing out or not, think I might stick to end of D1 and if I'm still not feeling this game then I'm gone.
At the beginning of the game you seemed to be hesitant to do anything and didn’t want to take any stances. If scum, it would prob mean that you were too stressed to initiate any sort of serious confrontation and didn’t want to stick your head out until it was safe for you to do so.
So I think you saying that: “it would be suboptimal if RCdidn’tpush himself into AC“ would be an unlikely move on your part if you were buddies. Based on my understanding of your previous mindstate, I think scum!you should be way more likely to start off by buddying a townie rather than strongly supporting another scum, so I doubt you’re SvS.
---------------------------
Ok, I’ll get to it eventually…
And if I understand it correctly “elaborate” means explaining why you think the way you do, or adding more details to your previous opinion…In post 776, Locke113 wrote:
As for Rui, I don't think I did elaborate as no one asked me to until now. Also no longer getting scummy vibes and actually quite liked her most recent postsIn post 755, LabRat01 wrote:@Locke, have you elaborated on the read o Rui already? If no, elaborate, if yes, quote please
I’m not really interested in your opinion about her recent posts tbh :/ I haven’t even gotten there yet
So you know, do it, please?- LabRat01
-
LabRat01 Goon
- LabRat01
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 804
- Joined: November 5, 2018
Yes, you did and sorry, but I don’t see the connection between your previous posts being bs and you having to bs me to explain them.In post 777, insomnia wrote:
Well, I said my posts were bs. Trying to respond to your questions regarding my bs posts would be in a way that is bs as well, and I don’t want to bs you, I like you, you’re reasonableIn post 773, LabRat01 wrote:The ones I responded to (758, 759, 761)
talk to me about it
and why did you write them if you were aware that they're bullshit?
Let me change my question. It seems you’re aware that your reasoning was bad, so why exactly were you pushing it so strongly?
1- why did you push yourself into AP so hard
2- if the read wasn’t serious, why did you suggest shooting you and lynching Roster later
was it a serious post?
Based on that I think it’s safe to say that it's unlikely for your posts to be reaction testsIn post 780, insomnia wrote:I have gone past that stage where I wanted to get AP’d a long time ago.
Let’s be honest, I haven’t read even half of the game and all of my reads are likely to change later, but it’s not like I’m just suddenly gonna forget about it. As you’ve probably seen before, I want those questions answered, so even if you say it’s bullshit I’d be glad if you did it. It’s not like you lose anything anyway- RadiantCowbells
-
RadiantCowbells Smooth Criminal
- RadiantCowbells
- Smooth Criminal
- Smooth Criminal
- Posts: 70566
- Joined: February 24, 2013
- Contact:
- RadiantCowbells
-
RadiantCowbells Smooth Criminal
- RadiantCowbells
- Smooth Criminal
- Smooth Criminal
- Posts: 70566
- Joined: February 24, 2013
- Contact:
- RadiantCowbells
-
RadiantCowbells Smooth Criminal
- RadiantCowbells
- Smooth Criminal
- Smooth Criminal
- Posts: 70566
- Joined: February 24, 2013
- Contact:
- RadiantCowbells
-
RadiantCowbells Smooth Criminal
- RadiantCowbells
- Smooth Criminal
- Smooth Criminal
- Posts: 70566
- Joined: February 24, 2013
- Contact:
- RadiantCowbells
-
RadiantCowbells Smooth Criminal
- RadiantCowbells
- Smooth Criminal
- Smooth Criminal
- Posts: 70566
- Joined: February 24, 2013
- Contact:
- RadiantCowbells
-
RadiantCowbells Smooth Criminal
- RadiantCowbells
- Smooth Criminal
- Smooth Criminal
- Posts: 70566
- Joined: February 24, 2013
- Contact:
- RadiantCowbells
-
RadiantCowbells Smooth Criminal
- RadiantCowbells
- Smooth Criminal
- Smooth Criminal
- Posts: 70566
- Joined: February 24, 2013
- Contact:
- RadiantCowbells
-
RadiantCowbells Smooth Criminal
- RadiantCowbells
- Smooth Criminal
- Smooth Criminal
- Posts: 70566
- Joined: February 24, 2013
- Contact:
- RadiantCowbells
-
RadiantCowbells Smooth Criminal
- RadiantCowbells
- Smooth Criminal
- Smooth Criminal
- Posts: 70566
- Joined: February 24, 2013
- Contact:
- RadiantCowbells
-
RadiantCowbells Smooth Criminal
- RadiantCowbells
- Smooth Criminal
- Smooth Criminal
- Posts: 70566
- Joined: February 24, 2013
- Contact:
- northsidegal
-
northsidegal Survivor
- northsidegal
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11481
- Joined: August 23, 2017
In post 785, RadiantCowbells wrote:NSG how do you feel about switching RCE for DDL
you're more confident on rce? i actually had them in reverse positions but swapped it last secondIn post 786, RadiantCowbells wrote:eh
I'm happy with DDL I guess
You're my sheep indefinitely if you're wrong there
also i think we'd have to check the scores if that were the case
i agree, actually.In post 794, RadiantCowbells wrote:Labrats town but I don't expect anyone else to agree so
like i said, i expect my reads to switch around in later days, especially as the lower posters post more.
i expect that like, many of my current "not town" reads could change given time.
you had DT as town earlier - confidence there?- RadiantCowbells
-
RadiantCowbells Smooth Criminal
- RadiantCowbells
- Smooth Criminal
- Smooth Criminal
- Posts: 70566
- Joined: February 24, 2013
- Contact:
- RadiantCowbells
-
RadiantCowbells Smooth Criminal
- RadiantCowbells
- Smooth Criminal
- Smooth Criminal
- Posts: 70566
- Joined: February 24, 2013
- Contact:
- northsidegal
-
northsidegal Survivor
- northsidegal
- Survivor
- Survivor
- Posts: 11481
- Joined: August 23, 2017
yeah, he's had a pretty bad presence so far- RadiantCowbells
-
RadiantCowbells Smooth Criminal
- RadiantCowbells
- Smooth Criminal
- Smooth Criminal
- Posts: 70566
- Joined: February 24, 2013
- Contact:
- RadiantCowbells
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
- northsidegal
- RadiantCowbells
- RadiantCowbells
- northsidegal
- RadiantCowbells
- RadiantCowbells
- RadiantCowbells
- RadiantCowbells
- RadiantCowbells
- RadiantCowbells
- RadiantCowbells
- RadiantCowbells
- RadiantCowbells
- RadiantCowbells
- LabRat01
- LabRat01
- Locke113
- Locke113
- insomnia
- insomnia
- Locke113
- insomnia
- Locke113
- insomnia