Mini 2063 - Rapier Upick Shuffle [Game Over]

Michael Scott · Post Post #1950 (ISO) » Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:16 am

He said he copies and pastes his style, not his game - he means he plays identically as town and scum, which is fair.

Creature · Post Post #1951 (ISO) » Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:16 am

I need something to cheer up my morning.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #1952 (ISO) » Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:16 am

and I voted the person who I thought had the highest equity of being your scumpartner because I couldn't lynch you. and that's clearly in the thread. so if you want to insist I can't read you, lol.

Creature · Post Post #1953 (ISO) » Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:17 am

Don't worry, I can calculate pH.

Michael Scott · Post Post #1954 (ISO) » Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:17 am

In post 1948, RadiantCowbells wrote:your assertion is stupid because at the sole point that I intended to place a meaningful vote I wanted to place it on you.

*Shrug*
You had me as scum

because

of the association with Saudade.
Where Saudade wasn't scum.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #1955 (ISO) » Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:17 am

In post 1950, Michael Scott wrote:he means he plays identically as town and scum, which is fair.

it's not fair it's an awfully stupid thing to say.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #1956 (ISO) » Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:17 am

In post 1954, Michael Scott wrote:
In post 1948, RadiantCowbells wrote:your assertion is stupid because at the sole point that I intended to place a meaningful vote I wanted to place it on you.
*Shrug*
You had me as scum
because
of the association with Saudade.
Where Saudade wasn't scum.

wrong.

I had

you

as scum and I voted Sau because he seemed like your partner.

Michael Scott · Post Post #1957 (ISO) » Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:18 am

In post 1952, RadiantCowbells wrote:and I voted the person who I thought had the highest equity of being your scumpartner because I couldn't lynch you. and that's clearly in the thread. so if you want to insist I can't read you, lol.

Lol indeed.

Michael Scott · Post Post #1958 (ISO) » Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:19 am

In post 1955, RadiantCowbells wrote:
In post 1950, Michael Scott wrote:he means he plays identically as town and scum, which is fair.
it's not fair it's an awfully stupid thing to say.

Most people on site strive to copy their town meta into their scumgames.

Creature · Post Post #1959 (ISO) » Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:19 am

I'll wait a fourth head say when the fight should be done.

Michael Scott · Post Post #1960 (ISO) » Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:19 am

In post 1956, RadiantCowbells wrote:wrong.

I had you as scum and I voted Sau because he seemed like your partner.

Again, /shrug
Post-flip your guess was URAP+Shoshin.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #1961 (ISO) » Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:19 am

most people on site recognize that they aren't literal perfect gods of scumplay who emulate their meta perfectly.

even if they were playing your towngame as scum is bad because you're playing to a town wincondition instead of a scum one.

Creature · Post Post #1962 (ISO) » Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:20 am

In post 1958, Michael Scott wrote:
In post 1955, RadiantCowbells wrote:
In post 1950, Michael Scott wrote:he means he plays identically as town and scum, which is fair.
it's not fair it's an awfully stupid thing to say.
Most people on site strive to copy their town meta into their scumgames.

Woah, I do the reverse.

Michael Scott · Post Post #1963 (ISO) » Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:20 am

Anyway, I don't particularly care about what you *intended* to do that game, etc etc.

Show me how this play matches my scum meta.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #1964 (ISO) » Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:20 am

In post 1960, Michael Scott wrote:
In post 1956, RadiantCowbells wrote:wrong.

I had you as scum and I voted Sau because he seemed like your partner.
Again, /shrug
Post-flip your guess was URAP+Shoshin.

my mistake was thinking that you/shoshin wasn't a thing because you would have done a better job of distancing.

people like me in setups like that tend to expect serious effort in the not being partners department.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #1965 (ISO) » Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:21 am

In post 1963, Michael Scott wrote:Anyway, I don't particularly care about what you *intended* to do that game, etc etc.

Show me how this play matches my scum meta.

again: why? what does it do for me?

it would be more of a token for respect for you if you're town but i have no respect for someone who doesn't townread me in this situation so . . .

Michael Scott · Post Post #1966 (ISO) » Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:21 am

In post 1961, RadiantCowbells wrote:even if they were playing your towngame as scum is bad because you're playing to a town wincondition instead of a scum one.

In terms of playing to town wincon as scum, no.
In terms of posting style in general, yes.

Asking meaningful questions, having a presence in the thread, things like that. That's what Saudade probs meant.

Creature · Post Post #1967 (ISO) » Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:21 am

100th post

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #1968 (ISO) » Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:23 am

i wouldn't say i perfectly copy and paste my style from scum to town and i'm pretty close to the upper limits of scumplay. saying that as someone who frequently loses trivial games is pretty sketchy.

Michael Scott · Post Post #1969 (ISO) » Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:24 am

In post 1965, RadiantCowbells wrote:again: why? what does it do for me?

it would be more of a token for respect for you if you're town but i have
no respect for someone who doesn't townread
me in this situation so . . .

For my curiosity, but feel free not to.
I don't care for respect. I'm here to play Mafia.
But then I shall also assert that you lack any solid reason to lynch me, and that holds.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #1970 (ISO) » Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:24 am

i mean

you can assert it

do you think it would prevent me from hypothetically lynching you?

Michael Scott · Post Post #1971 (ISO) » Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:25 am

In post 1968, RadiantCowbells wrote:i wouldn't say i perfectly copy and paste my style from scum to town and i'm pretty close to the upper limits of scumplay. saying that as someone who frequently loses trivial games is pretty sketchy.

I'm making a charitable interpretation of what he said, not taking it at literal face-value. But you do you!

Michael Scott · Post Post #1972 (ISO) » Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:26 am

In post 1970, RadiantCowbells wrote:do you think it would prevent me from hypothetically lynching you?

No, but I wouldn't take blame for being lynched.

Michael Scott · Post Post #1973 (ISO) » Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:27 am

In post 1972, Michael Scott wrote:
In post 1970, RadiantCowbells wrote:do you think it would prevent me from hypothetically lynching you?
No, but I wouldn't take blame for being lynched.

Also, I'd appreciate it if people don't blindly sheep RC and show their own reasoning for wanting to lynch me - preferably outside "PoE".
Or, of course, admit that they don't have any solid basis too.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #1974 (ISO) » Sat Mar 23, 2019 3:28 am

i mean

you're not townreading the person who led on scum who was near universally townread so...