In post 3100, northsidegal wrote:
Mod Notes:
skitter30 is V/LA on weekends.
Nimueh is V/LA while sick.
Flubber ICs 9 minutes after he’s at L-2.
In post 3100, northsidegal wrote:
Mod Notes:
skitter30 is V/LA on weekends.
Nimueh is V/LA while sick.
Flubber ICs 9 minutes after he’s at L-2.
I disagree with the bolded. In this setup, I think that’s reversed. In your typical game, scum can bus and still win. In this setup,In post 3988, Succinct wrote:You'll never find me active, least of all not now. (Knowing my main'd help know why I'm particularly inactive now.) My gamesolving's in establishing townreads more than establishing scumreads, but I've done both.In post 3888, Tohru wrote:1. Flying under the radar, and 2. Lack of gamesolving.
I'm aided by people engaging me, but them not doing so's out of my control. If people don't interact with what I post, then I don't have anything to follow through on.
You're making me miss Ank, because she's one of the few whowouldengage me.
Question my reasons for NMSA, question my reasons for Elbirn, question my townreads.
What about it's wrong?In post 3891, Tohru wrote:^This post is also a pretty bad look.
The only possible scum mastermind's me, and Iknowthat's not right.
Knowing this, scum didn't have one.
Knowing they didn't have one, scum're going to play more as individuals.
The average individual scum player shows high levels of self-preservation, more interested in personal survival than survival of scumteam.
I think given this setup, that trait's amplified.
Voting Flubber risked five players becoming conftown. Flubber had ~7 different voters at different time. They aren't all town. As a result, scum at some point did cast a bus vote, and I think they did it for precisely the reason I outlined above:an increased sense of self-preservation, leading to a decreased interest of survival of the scumteam.
In post 3898, tris wrote:Never NMSA who I think is town.Remind me why.In post 3899, Chara wrote:NMSA also has good reasons to be town (that i've actually looked at)
uh that's a *pretty* big tether in this setup, and i don't think it ought to just be ignoredIn post 3812, xRECKONERx wrote:ok but if there's no other tethers besides the fact i defended him then where does that leave you
like seriously.
me and flub both doing the "vote someone oh shit unvote immediately" thing d1?
flub specifically ignoring me because i was pushing his name out as town?
idk man i feel like im not so bad i would play this way if flub was my buddy
like are you usually this bad as town?In post 3824, xRECKONERx wrote:i think in general my play of "being on the wrong wagon every day and specifically staying off flub" is bad play and im ashamed of it
i don't think elbirn's resistance ot the flubber wagon was scummy actually; it felt like he couldn't understand what on earth ank was doing and he didn't want to join something he didn't understand (which is why he resisted *both* xtoxm and flubber), rather than pushing against flubber specificallyIn post 3854, Tohru wrote:Xtoxm is town, Elbirn is hard scum now.
I don’t understand this. Why is it the “correct theoretical play”?In post 3993, Succinct wrote:I should also emphasize: how would you feel, as a person who prides themselves on theory, that the correct theoretical play's to let your largest scumread live, in spite of a bs claim?In post 3989, Succinct wrote:How would you feel knowing the correct theoretical play's to let your scumread live, in spite of a bs claim?
I knew the correct theoretical play was letting him live.
And I was feeling defeated because of it.
yeah iirc at the end of day1 they had a fairly strong fairly mysterious scumread on flubber (like, way before it was popular) and like i asked about it but it never got explained and succinct decidedly pushed brigitte over like pushign flubber at any pointIn post 3892, Tohru wrote:To put it in other terms, Succinct was neverpushingFlubbernugget, he was onlyvotinghim.
Again, I had the same doubts as you yesterday, which was why I hesitated temporarily switched back to Elbirn. But upon re-analysis I believe this is the best conclusion.
In post 2165, Succinct wrote:Creature > skitter30 > tris = Ankamius > Nimueh > Xtoxm = xRECKONERx = NotMySpamAccount = Elbirn = Chara (need more on all of these) > Flubbernugget = Brigitte
yeah this isn't a particularly good vote tbhIn post 2394, Succinct wrote:Apologies. I do what I can, but succinctness does not foster activity.
VOTE: Flubbernugget
Still a scumread.
Vaguely lean Xtoxm/Chara town, but those're gut; I have no evidence backing reads up.
Think remaining two're in xRECKONERx/NotMySpamAccount/Elbirn.
this basicallyIn post 3902, Chara wrote:i do think that if you're scum with Flubber, your interactions with him are pretty ridiculous and would indicate misplays as scum.In post 3824, xRECKONERx wrote:not sure i follow?
i think in general my play of "being on the wrong wagon every day and specifically staying off flub" is bad play and im ashamed of it
however, i think the interactions between me n flub arent svs if you really look at them with a deeper critical eye
but i'm not comfortable ignoring the possibility that scum you made a mistake, because it's easier to see why scum you makes those decisions in error, as scum (distancing mistakes), than why town you does it. (forgetting that you townread him a few times is just so strange to me.)
that rvs interaction didn't feel svs to meIn post 3906, Chara wrote:is this early game distancing between Reck and Enter or am i too far gone down the rabbit hole?
there's probably no way to actually tell and i'm jumping at nothing because it might fit with what i think the team is.
do tellIn post 3923, Tohru wrote:I think last scum is skitter30. No longer interested in NMSA or Elbirn.
this is actually kinda helpful context, i appreciate you saying thisIn post 3968, xRECKONERx wrote:this isn't AtE but i do need to say this for context:
i have an extremely bad drinking problem and uh a lot of those "forgetting" moments happen when i've already been drinking and just blindly barge into thread and try to read and then have a moment of clarity of "wait no"
i don't expect that to change your mind, but i wanted to put it out there. i forget that most of the people who know me IRL and have known me a long time dont really play on the site anymore or have moved on to mish mash so some of those things about me that i think are obvious arent as obvious to the playerbase anymore
huhIn post 3985, northsidegal wrote:In post 3930, Nimueh wrote:@mod, if game doesn’t end today, does scum get an NK, in addition to the escape?Yes. This nightkill is mandatory.
you're not really pushing him in any of these thoIn post 3987, Succinct wrote:You apparently missed a few posts pushing Flubber significantly.
Of 29 posts, I pushed him in 9+ of them.
The ones not pushing him, most're establishing/defending/explaining townreads, or pushing NMSA, or pushing Elbirn.
I never let up on Flubber; my push on NMSA's been the same since D2.
In post 3957, Nimueh wrote: Yes, she said the vote counter is broken or something?
Elbirn voted me for dumbass reasons and NMSA immediately jumped onboard. That’s the main reason why Chara’s defensiveness is irritating to me. I’m sure if she had two votes on her, she would not find her posts very reassuring if I made them. Why? Because it is my very strong current belief that scum is trying to set up Reck/me mislynches. Therefore anyone both pushing Reck and not townlocking me, who I can’t townlock for other reasons, can’t help pinging me.
In post 3970, Nimueh wrote: That would be an awesome mechanic. Yeah, let’s swap horrible NMSA and Elbirn and bring back Brigitte and Xtoxm. I’m all for it.
I still think Elbirn is scum and NMSA is only town due to clear anti-partner associatives. Elbirn lied. He claimed to townlocked me, when the closest he ever got to that, is you can be town for now but if I sr you, we be cool crap.
.....Okay.In post 3998, Nimueh wrote: I dunno, I think Chara’s AtE seems genuine, where as Elbirn’s is just posturing. The only thing that gives me possible pause about it, is would scum!Elbirn really be that nasty? Would he really employ character assassination as a method to mislynch me? I’ve witnessed scum do it, so meta reads would be most useful in that regard. Like I know for me, I wouldn’t do that as scum but I’ve seen it happen and been on the receiving end of it.
When responding to lots of content, can only trim so much down.In post 3996, xRECKONERx wrote:that wasn't very succinct
Then do you think every Flubber voter was town?In post 4001, Nimueh wrote:I disagree with the bolded. In this setup, I think that’s reversed. In your typical game, scum can bus and still win. In this setup,the ENTIRE scumteam must survive or they ALL lose. Iow,in THIS setup, self-preservation=ultimately protecting your team. No, this is faulty reasoning here, becauseself-preservation=survival of the scumteam in THIS setup.
Sorry, but no.In post 4006, Nimueh wrote:I don’t understand this. Why is it the “correct theoretical play”? the correct theoretical play, is always pushing your strongest sr, no matter what.
Where did you get the impression I wasn't willing to vote Elbirn?In post 4006, Nimueh wrote:Both you and NMSA have Elbirn in your POE but neither of you, are willing to vote him.
Pardon? Where'd you ask? I saw nothing of this sort until D2.In post 4007, skitter30 wrote:yeah iirc at the end of day1 they had a fairly strong fairly mysterious scumread on flubber (like, way before it was popular) and like i asked about it but it never got explained
Correct. Half my reason for voting Brigitte was Brigitte > tris as a wagon, and both were the lead wagons.In post 4007, skitter30 wrote:tbf that was *fairly* close to eod so there might not have been time to actually push flubber there
You'll also not remember me interacting with most players this game, because few have engaged me. Flubber's nothing special in that regard.In post 4007, skitter30 wrote:but i don't remember the two of them interacting like *at all*
In post 4008, skitter30 wrote:and there's like no mention of flubber in their iso before this besides for the like the afore-mentioned scumread which is meh
In post 3992, Succinct wrote:It's inIn post 3965, Tohru wrote:Has Succinct ever explained his Flubber scumread?the very post you quoted:Ank was talking about Flubber.In post 2165, Succinct wrote:Experience says odds're slot's scum.In post 2063, Ankamius wrote:Like I remember he was in my scum pool but fucked if I know why anymore
Someone who's in the scum pool yet you don't remember why is usually scum; doubly so when said someone's a player like Flubber.
If anyone hadaskedme about this at the time, I'd happily have said as much.
Hello Mister Reckoner,In post 3971, Tohru wrote:The setup changed to White Flag on Day 3, Mister Reck. Scum could "bus" (read: distance. A bus occurs when a teammate actually gets their head rolled under the bus.) before that.In post 3968, xRECKONERx wrote:this is actually a really salient point, i think. like i actually sat back and went "....huh"In post 3939, Tohru wrote:In post 3803, xRECKONERx wrote:there is more subtext to interactions than TOWN MAN DEFEND BAD MAN TOWN MAN BAD MANIn post 3796, skitter30 wrote:uh the fact that you badly townread him the whole time he was alive and refused to vote himIn post 3785, xRECKONERx wrote:again, ill ask: what part of me/flub interacting makes sense SvSIn post 3759, Nimueh wrote:Scumteam has to be Elbirn/Reck. I think it’s Flubber/Elbirn/Reck and I’ve solved the game. If I’m right, I want bragging rights.
Mister Reck, there is also more subtext to interactions than MAN VOTE BAD MAN MAN TOWN MAN. I truly hope that this could dispel your Succinct townread that may be solely on the basis of his vote on Flubber.
i guess what im struggling with is the idea that Succinct would risk his buddy dying in that way. you yourself have said scum aren't going to bus in this setup, so why do you think Succinct is the exception to the rule?
Scum also had special privileged access to the setup information that Town did not have. Which means to say, theyknewthat a player had to escape even if they played a perfect game on Days 1 and 2. In fact, they did not just know, but theychosethat player to leave.
This is a very important point, because it means that scum could plan their interactionssince the start of the game. Clearly they've been doing well, since town as a collective whole was unable to lynch any of the three of them on Days 1 and 2 (and, I thought the lynches were pretty towny and a huge waste, but that's just my opinion!).
Which means to say, Mister Reck, that Succinct's uncanny accuracy on Flubber, was a sham. An act of deception, if you will, meant to convince the rest of the town that he is not part of the scum. And it was a planned, calculated approach. Not good enough to deceive the eyes of Tohru, I might say, but I think by its merits it was sufficient to fool quite a reasonable number of town, which is sufficient.
Now, you ask, why take risks? Two things: 1. It was a low risk, high reward. Flubber's IC claim was made knowing the fact that he would be escaping the next day, and this took advantage of the fact that town did not have this knowledge. Meaning to say, that this event was planned for an unknown period of time. Since the start of the game? Halfway through Day 1? Day 2? This is not important to us, actually. 2. People take risks for the silliest reasons all the time. Why did the 16-year-old boy perform incredibly dangerous parkour/skateboard tricks, just to impress the girl, but risking his neck being broken and hospitalized? Not everyone can assess risk clearly and accurately, without actually putting a lot of thought into it.
In other words, the play was actually a lot lower risk than you think it is, Mister Reck. It was sufficient to fool the town, but it isn't perfectly executed: If you read a bit of my reply to Nimeuh (which is also directed at you, too), you'll notice that Succinct's reasons for scumreading Flubber were non-existent, hinting that it might be fake.
Repeat: The players you called my scumbuddies are the onesIn post 4017, Succinct wrote:Tohru:It should sendmassivered flags to you that thepeople you've partnered with meare the ones voting me.
Your solve's wrong.
Fix it.
VOTE: Elbirn
I actually don't know. Your scumteam actually played a pretty strong game to obscure that last scumbuddy, I'll say. Credit to your partner.In post 4021, Succinct wrote:Repeat: The players you called my scumbuddies are the onesIn post 4017, Succinct wrote:Tohru:It should sendmassivered flags to you that thepeople you've partnered with meare the ones voting me.
Your solve's wrong.
Fix it.
VOTE: Elbirnbacking you up.
If I was scum, I'd have a scumbuddy; who'd it be?
Alternatively, it's because I'm not scum andIn post 4023, Tohru wrote:I actually don't know. Your scumteam actually played a pretty strong game to obscure that last scumbuddy, I'll say. Credit to your partner.