Fire on the Mountain [Over]

Liger_Zero · Post Post #3775 (ISO) » Sun Mar 31, 2019 3:46 am

Went back to look for reasons for my wagon, couldn't find any beyond Eagle saying I am not adding anything to the game, so not sure what is the deal with this.

If we are doing a trade for me and Max, I am for it. Not sure if even half the people scumread me here though.

Vedith · Post Post #3776 (ISO) » Sun Mar 31, 2019 4:48 am

I'm allowed to stay in the game so I take back the /replace.
Won't happen again.

DrDolittle · Post Post #3777 (ISO) » Sun Mar 31, 2019 4:59 am

o/ Vedith

Vedith · Post Post #3778 (ISO) » Sun Mar 31, 2019 5:04 am

I still think Xtomx for the lynch here.
The vote on me seemed a cop out.

Liger_Zero · Post Post #3779 (ISO) » Sun Mar 31, 2019 5:35 am

Reiuji Utsuho · Post Post #3780 (ISO) » Sun Mar 31, 2019 5:36 am

I don't really oppose Xtomx lynch either.

I will be around if what they called in the other site I played "Chinese Fire Drill" happens here too.

Liger_Zero · Post Post #3781 (ISO) » Sun Mar 31, 2019 5:47 am

Or we could go for Max instead because you agreed to me or Max.

Dannflor · Post Post #3782 (ISO) » Sun Mar 31, 2019 5:49 am

In post 3750, MaxwellPuckett wrote:I forgot Gamma was the same slot I should ISO them too
Kinda kno how to read gamma

interested in this

Liger_Zero · Post Post #3783 (ISO) » Sun Mar 31, 2019 5:52 am

In post 3782, Dannflor wrote:
In post 3750, MaxwellPuckett wrote:I forgot Gamma was the same slot I should ISO them too
Kinda kno how to read gamma
interested in this

No you aren't.

Vedith · Post Post #3784 (ISO) » Sun Mar 31, 2019 5:53 am

In post 3779, Liger_Zero wrote:Naah

Why though?

Liger_Zero · Post Post #3785 (ISO) » Sun Mar 31, 2019 5:54 am

In post 3784, Vedith wrote:
In post 3779, Liger_Zero wrote:Naah
Why though?

Xtoxm reasoning for voting you is bad but wasn't scummy. Xtoxm is just completely disinterested in the game, and if you are town you should be able to see that.

Dannflor · Post Post #3786 (ISO) » Sun Mar 31, 2019 5:55 am

In post 3781, Liger_Zero wrote:Or we could go for Max instead because you agreed to me or Max.

who is scum besides max

is there anyone else in the game you would "trade" yourself for

Liger_Zero · Post Post #3787 (ISO) » Sun Mar 31, 2019 5:56 am

In post 3786, Dannflor wrote:
In post 3781, Liger_Zero wrote:Or we could go for Max instead because you agreed to me or Max.
who is scum besides max

is there anyone else in the game you would "trade" yourself for

I have no other strong scumreads right now. So no.

Liger_Zero · Post Post #3788 (ISO) » Sun Mar 31, 2019 5:57 am

Maybe DrDoLittle. I lost my townread on him for his push on me. He actually doesn't seem interested in sorting anything and maybe just avoiding being lynched himself and not in the town I want to live kind of way.

Dannflor · Post Post #3789 (ISO) » Sun Mar 31, 2019 5:59 am

In post 2916, DrDolittle wrote:guys lets have some conviction and consolidate on a lynch.

In post 3122, DrDolittle wrote:i want to omgus but im committed to wagon building VOTE: anka

Self vote, get into an argument, and replace out.
oof

He didn't push you he just voted you to build a wagon

which is consistent with his attitude all day and seems pretty townie

Vedith · Post Post #3790 (ISO) » Sun Mar 31, 2019 5:59 am

In post 3785, Liger_Zero wrote:
In post 3784, Vedith wrote:
In post 3779, Liger_Zero wrote:Naah
Why though?
Xtoxm reasoning for voting you is bad but wasn't scummy. Xtoxm is just completely disinterested in the game, and if you are town you should be able to see that.

It's more the timing of it I guess then.
Convince me on Max then. The fact you're pushing away from Xtomx when the leading lynch is good at least. So maybe town for you.

Liger_Zero · Post Post #3791 (ISO) » Sun Mar 31, 2019 6:00 am

In post 3789, Dannflor wrote:He didn't push you he just voted you to build a wagonwhich is consistent with his attitude all day and seems pretty townie

Not really.
He wouldn't push some wagons because "he liked them" and when interest on him resurfaced he went on my wagon for no reason given.

If that is consistent, its very inconsistent.

Dannflor · Post Post #3792 (ISO) » Sun Mar 31, 2019 6:01 am

Spoiler:

he's also doing a good job of looking like he's sorting if he's scum

Dannflor · Post Post #3793 (ISO) » Sun Mar 31, 2019 6:02 am

In post 3791, Liger_Zero wrote:when interest on him resurfaced

When did this happen?

Liger_Zero · Post Post #3794 (ISO) » Sun Mar 31, 2019 6:02 am

In post 3792, Dannflor wrote:he's also doing a good job of looking like he's sorting if he's scum

Good for him.

Dannflor · Post Post #3795 (ISO) » Sun Mar 31, 2019 6:09 am

The only point I can find where he avoided a wagon because "he liked them" was Vedith, and he ended up voting there anyway when he came back into the thread.

I'm not convinced your reasons for scum reading him are genuine.

Liger_Zero · Post Post #3796 (ISO) » Sun Mar 31, 2019 6:10 am

I am not convinced I said I scumread him and said he was maybe scum. But do go on.

Dannflor · Post Post #3797 (ISO) » Sun Mar 31, 2019 6:14 am

In post 3796, Liger_Zero wrote:I am not convinced I said I scumread him and said he was maybe scum. But do go on.

In what world is "maybe-scum" not at the very least a lean-scum read?

You straight up said "Maybe DDL" in response to my question of who you would trade your lynch for.

Liger_Zero · Post Post #3798 (ISO) » Sun Mar 31, 2019 6:16 am

I said I wouldn't trade myself for anyone else, and that I was maybe scumreading DDL. Not that I would maybe trade myself for DDL. But I can see how that was misunderstood.

Liger_Zero · Post Post #3799 (ISO) » Sun Mar 31, 2019 6:17 am

This whole encounter really just seems like you are here to just argue points for no reason than to justify your vote.