what's your plan for tomorrowIn post 3949, Dannflor wrote:I don't think Liger gives as much information as you claim
and I don't think he flips scum very often
off of an xtoxm flip
what's your plan for tomorrowIn post 3949, Dannflor wrote:I don't think Liger gives as much information as you claim
and I don't think he flips scum very often
Couldn't honestly tell you.In post 3953, mcqueen wrote:someone update me, why all the votes on Liger?
I think they sell a cream for that.In post 3955, Xtoxm wrote:ugh i break out in hives every time i accidentally read a prince post
Uhhh what? I don't go passive when I go aggressive. I have been snarky but not passive aggressive here.In post 3952, RAS wrote:I haven't read too many of L0's recent posts and mostly focus'd on older stuff, but one thing I noticed when I interacted with him a little earlier is that there was a lot of passive aggressiveness coming from his posts.
I pointed out that my vote is on you purely based on the player who was originally in your slot. Of course it's not a read, it's a comment and something I've noticed while reading your posts. Whether it's passive aggressive or just aggressive doesn't ultimately matter here since there's no room for either or. I never claimed that it was alignment indicative in any way.In post 3959, Liger_Zero wrote:Uhhh what? I don't go passive when I go aggressive. I have been snarky but not passive aggressive here.In post 3952, RAS wrote:I haven't read too many of L0's recent posts and mostly focus'd on older stuff, but one thing I noticed when I interacted with him a little earlier is that there was a lot of passive aggressiveness coming from his posts.
Also this isn't a read.
I could, but like I said, my vote is on you purely because of Gamma's posts. There's not much I could ask you that would help me change my mind, unless you can explain why all of Gamma's post are practically empty. I really dislike how you jumped to conclusion when I specifically said my vote on you was purely because of Gamma's posts, but whatever.Liger_Zero wrote:Okay, and you don't want to question me because....
They are empty. I read them and got nothing while reading except I don't think gamma was mentally in the game.In post 3967, RAS wrote:I could, but like I said, my vote is on you purely because of Gamma's posts. There's not much I could ask you that would help me change my mind, unless you can explain why all of Gamma's post are practically empty. I really dislike how you jumped to conclusion when I specifically said my vote on you was purely because of Gamma's posts, but whatever.Liger_Zero wrote:Okay, and you don't want to question me because....
And how would you dislike being scumread for a predecessor who made a tenth of your posts while the person says "I have no opinion on you"? Cause that is what you are doing which is utter crap.In post 3967, RAS wrote:I could, but like I said, my vote is on you purely because of Gamma's posts. There's not much I could ask you that would help me change my mind, unless you can explain why all of Gamma's post are practically empty. I really dislike how you jumped to conclusion when I specifically said my vote on you was purely because of Gamma's posts, but whatever.Liger_Zero wrote:Okay, and you don't want to question me because....
Because his posts are there, and it's your slot--that's why. If anyone opens in any game and their first 20 or so posts are all empty/filler, then am I wrong to suspect that that slot is more than likely scum? Yes, you are here now, but it's doesn't change that those posts are linked to your slot.In post 3968, Liger_Zero wrote:They are empty. I read them and got nothing while reading except I don't think gamma was mentally in the game.In post 3967, RAS wrote:I could, but like I said, my vote is on you purely because of Gamma's posts. There's not much I could ask you that would help me change my mind, unless you can explain why all of Gamma's post are practically empty. I really dislike how you jumped to conclusion when I specifically said my vote on you was purely because of Gamma's posts, but whatever.Liger_Zero wrote:Okay, and you don't want to question me because....
Not sure why you are hanging up on his posts when I am here.
It's happened to me in the past, and I didn't mind it so much. When you replace into a slot, you should fully expect that to happen in some cases. You can call it crap all you want, but it's not going to change my opinion. The slot is linked to you, I don't like what they posted. I also don't like how you're focusing on my read specifically when I was the last person voting you. Appealing to me and telling me what I'm doing is crap isn't going to do anything. I never said there was nothing you could do, I just said that I had nothing to ask you because my read on you is purely based on your predecessor.Liger_Zero wrote:And how would you dislike being scumread for a predecessor who made a tenth of your posts while the person says "I have no opinion on you"? Cause that is what you are doing which is utter crap.In post 3967, RAS wrote:I could, but like I said, my vote is on you purely because of Gamma's posts. There's not much I could ask you that would help me change my mind, unless you can explain why all of Gamma's post are practically empty. I really dislike how you jumped to conclusion when I specifically said my vote on you was purely because of Gamma's posts, but whatever.Liger_Zero wrote:Okay, and you don't want to question me because....
And I am about an inch away from just going full on aggressive with you if you think I was being "passive aggressive" before, you won't even know what this is.