these are (one of) and (one of)
or world-building of teams?
these are (one of) and (one of)
In post 819, Eragon wrote:TOWN BLOCK
Eragon
Alacrity
Very Strong townreads
Pengu
Nom
last scum in
Locke
NM
Scum
Roster
In post 1327, PenguinPower wrote:I'm glad people are realizing why I think NM and roster are scum.
It would be cool if you did this btw. Not sure how I missed it earlier.In post 820, Eragon wrote:if anyone really wants me to analyze how alacrity is confirmed town, i will
In post 1331, PenguinPower wrote:It would be cool if you did this btw. Not sure how I missed it earlier.In post 820, Eragon wrote:if anyone really wants me to analyze how alacrity is confirmed town, i will
I keep having gut issues with the GW wagon being all town, and given posts today by Ank, this would help ease my mind.
In post 194, GrandWazoo wrote:Declare intent to put Insomnia L-1. What this world is coming to
Alacrity is an enigma. I don't like enigmas. Stuff like their unvote and 142 ping me.
In post 346, GrandWazoo wrote:@Alacrity:
By keeping your main a secret you are denying us the chance to compare your present play with your town/scum meta. A town player would welcome such scrutiny.I don't understand why scum specifically would engage that point the way I did, but town would not. I thought that entire engagement was self-evident, so it is entirely possible that something got lost in translation.
I did not answer your question because there really is not any reason to. Revealing why I want this alt to be secret would be counter-productive, as it would drastically reduce the amount of players that it can apply to. I quite like this alt, I would like to keep using it. =)
Transparency is only counter-productive to scum.
In post 352, GrandWazoo wrote:Urap always scumreads me for bogus reasons. But he usually at least pretends to make some sort of case. Seems to be phoning it in this game.
Alacrity votes meagain. Since the first vote was embedded in a wall (as usual), maybe she didn't even notice.
In post 359, GrandWazoo wrote:Then why the mystery?In post 358, Alacrity wrote:Knowing who I am would not help you read me. =)
You can always create another alt you know.
In post 360, GrandWazoo wrote:You can't enter the game proudly declaring your alt, daring ppl to guess who it is, then complain because someone actually wants to know.In post 355, nomnomnom wrote:I wouldn't say it's conspiracy theory levels, I'd say it's more unnecessary invasive questioning.In post 354, Locke113 wrote:In post 346, GrandWazoo wrote:By keeping your main a secret you are denying us the chance to compare your present play with your town/scum meta. A town player would welcome such scrutiny.
Transparency is only counter-productive to scum.@NomNow this, this right here is conspiracy theory levels
Like, I can think of a lot of reasons why you would want to start an alt or in general start a new account and remain secret, that are not related to the game at all. Clearly she does not want to be recognized, so why press the issue for this long?
Like honestly I can't say if he's being invasive because he MUST know who Alacrity are so he will press the issue ad infinitum, or if there's something more to it.
In post 432, GrandWazoo wrote:I'm wondering if scum have some weird mecha where they get rewarded for double voting. Alacrity and NM have both done it. This doesn't happen by accident on the same wagon.
And no Urap I didn't think I was hammered. I may be a prick but I'm not an idiot lol
one of these is also about the altIn post 446, GrandWazoo wrote:No clue. Just weird to me. The alternative explanation is they're sowing confusion or DGAF.In post 435, PenguinPower wrote:What normal ability would you suggest that falls under?In post 432, GrandWazoo wrote:I'm wondering if scum have some weird mecha where they get rewarded for double voting. Alacrity and NM have both done it. This doesn't happen by accident on the same wagon.
You don't see NM's voting around the GW wagon to seem bad for him?In post 1332, Eragon wrote:I definitely see reasons that N_M could be town, as i've expressed earlier, although he has been getting grating recently.
i mean, they hammer tested GWIn post 1336, PenguinPower wrote:You don't see NM's voting around the GW wagon to seem bad for him?In post 1332, Eragon wrote:I definitely see reasons that N_M could be town, as i've expressed earlier, although he has been getting grating recently.
I don't know how to feel about the implication I've managed to play scummier than the renowned quickhammerer this gameIn post 1311, Ankamius wrote:locke + roster have the most suspicious d1 movements
The final post is at start of D2. Nice misrep. I was about to hammer him after my actual last D1 post.In post 1324, Eragon wrote:In post 386, rosterfoster wrote:VOTE: GrandwazooIn post 346, GrandWazoo wrote:@Alacrity:
By keeping your main a secret you are denying us the chance to compare your present play with your town/scum meta. A town player would welcome such scrutiny.I don't understand why scum specifically would engage that point the way I did, but town would not. I thought that entire engagement was self-evident, so it is entirely possible that something got lost in translation.
I did not answer your question because there really is not any reason to. Revealing why I want this alt to be secret would be counter-productive, as it would drastically reduce the amount of players that it can apply to. I quite like this alt, I would like to keep using it. =)
Transparency is only counter-productive to scum.
L-1In post 392, rosterfoster wrote:It's such a bs reason to start pushing someone.
There's standard bs reasons, and there's that.In post 673, rosterfoster wrote:Eragon makes common read for scum, ergo Eragon is town.
Seems legit.In post 712, rosterfoster wrote:VOTE: Not_mafia
We should actually just Lynch this.
Like I know what he's doing is NAI but I can't stand it.In post 716, rosterfoster wrote:DW penguin I'll Lynch GW IRL tomorrow.In post 745, rosterfoster wrote:I don’t even remember doing that. I might be mixing games together though.
GW you should claim.these are the posts close-ish-ish to EoD 1In post 826, rosterfoster wrote:In post 364, GrandWazoo wrote:Ok I'll drop the alt business since it seems NAI here.
Nomnom & Urap still haven't addressed 282
I feel like this post happened because of a partner telling him to stop. 3 people doing this were URAP, Nom and Locke.
you push GW a little, completey drop it.
then you vote THREE OTHER, DIFFERENT PEOPLE
without even mentioning GW
then you go back to pushing GW as scum, but not dropping a vote, as well as linking a scum!Wazoo narrative with one of URAP/Nom/locke
should probably point out how scummy this post is tooIn post 1343, Locke113 wrote:I don't know how to feel about the implication I've managed to play scummier than the renowned quickhammerer this gameIn post 1311, Ankamius wrote:locke + roster have the most suspicious d1 movements
Also before I place my vote on N_M, is there much point in us dragging this day out much longer or does anyone, *cough* Eragon *cough*, want us to wait longer for more talking back and just arriving at basically the same scumteam that was put forward at the start of this day?