Newbie 1924 - Game Over

MaryJoLisa · Post Post #550 (ISO) » Mon Apr 15, 2019 3:12 am

In post 543, Datisi wrote:UNVOTE: Salad
No problem. I still find him scummy though :p

I think the vote belongs on Salad, but I haven't finished reading and I want to give him a fair shake before someone hammers.

In post 544, TTTT wrote:
In post 540, TTTT wrote:@MJL
why'd you decide to read and post thoughts without looking at the flips first?

In post 541, MaryJoLisa wrote:I wanted to play the game. I got impatient, though.
ok
but why not click on the dead players spoiler in the opening post
to help guide your thinking as you review?
what is the benefit of going in blind when replacing in on day2?

I can do that after I do an uninformed read through and get authentic first impressions.

In post 548, TTTT wrote:
In post 546, MaryJoLisa wrote:That's fine. I am what I am.
don't ever forget who was your 1st BFF

You were!

MaryJoLisa · Post Post #551 (ISO) » Mon Apr 15, 2019 3:47 am

In post 488, TTTT wrote:
In post 353, RCEnigma wrote:
In post 349, Vedith wrote:I'm killing you tonight for that comment alone.
I think we both know who the nk is and it isn't me.
was thinking of this and other stuff
hint: the Vedith NK points to a RBer

RBer? What's that?

MaryJoLisa · Post Post #552 (ISO) » Mon Apr 15, 2019 3:53 am

In post 543, Datisi wrote:UNVOTE: Salad
No problem. I still find him scummy though :p

Okay, actually I got there a lot faster than I expected. Everything is pretty well laid out in the material that's been posted already.

I'm good with a salad vote. He's already claimed, he's left his reads list. Are we ready to hammer then?

Datisi · Post Post #553 (ISO) » Mon Apr 15, 2019 3:58 am

VOTE: Salad
Since SE's have decided to be all mysterious, fine by me

MaryJoLisa · Post Post #554 (ISO) » Mon Apr 15, 2019 4:04 am

VOTE: Saladman

Datisi · Post Post #555 (ISO) » Mon Apr 15, 2019 4:10 am

TTTT, are you gonna change your vote back?

MaryJoLisa · Post Post #556 (ISO) » Mon Apr 15, 2019 4:13 am

Come on now, TTTT.

TTTT · Post Post #557 (ISO) » Mon Apr 15, 2019 4:16 am

In post 551, MaryJoLisa wrote:RBer? What's that?

Role-blocker

TTTT · Post Post #558 (ISO) » Mon Apr 15, 2019 4:16 am

In post 554, MaryJoLisa wrote:VOTE: Saladman

In post 555, Datisi wrote:TTTT, are you gonna change your vote back?

In post 556, MaryJoLisa wrote:Come on now, TTTT.

why the rush?

TTTT · Post Post #559 (ISO) » Mon Apr 15, 2019 4:18 am

Salad is at L-1 btw

TTTT · Post Post #560 (ISO) » Mon Apr 15, 2019 4:19 am

In post 550, MaryJoLisa wrote:
In post 544, TTTT wrote:
In post 540, TTTT wrote:@MJL
why'd you decide to read and post thoughts without looking at the flips first?

In post 541, MaryJoLisa wrote:I wanted to play the game. I got impatient, though.
ok
but why not click on the dead players spoiler in the opening post
to help guide your thinking as you review?
what is the benefit of going in blind when replacing in on day2?
I can do that after I do an uninformed read through and get authentic first impressions.

how about now?

Datisi · Post Post #561 (ISO) » Mon Apr 15, 2019 4:19 am

I've half-given up on figuring out what game SE's are playing. It set aside, I'd wanted to lynch Salad since Day 1

But yeah, do that maybe

MaryJoLisa · Post Post #562 (ISO) » Mon Apr 15, 2019 4:23 am

In post 560, TTTT wrote:
In post 550, MaryJoLisa wrote:
In post 544, TTTT wrote:
In post 540, TTTT wrote:@MJL
why'd you decide to read and post thoughts without looking at the flips first?

In post 541, MaryJoLisa wrote:I wanted to play the game. I got impatient, though.
ok
but why not click on the dead players spoiler in the opening post
to help guide your thinking as you review?
what is the benefit of going in blind when replacing in on day2?
I can do that after I do an uninformed read through and get authentic first impressions.
how about now?

I haven't finished reading all together, but I'm satisfied about Saladman.

What's your take on RCEnigma, TTTT?

RCEnigma · Post Post #563 (ISO) » Mon Apr 15, 2019 4:25 am

In post 534, TTTT wrote:For whatever it's worth...
I'm not sure that the mystery RCE is talking about is the same thing I'm talking about
bc I don't think I should be conftown from his POV
unless he's seeing something different

Actually given the setup you may be right and I hadn't thought it through fully but bringing up setup A was unnecessary as scum unless setting up a fake claim. Which I tried to get ahead of considering I thought you were trying to fake claim tracker.

MaryJoLisa · Post Post #564 (ISO) » Mon Apr 15, 2019 4:25 am

In post 558, TTTT wrote:
In post 554, MaryJoLisa wrote:VOTE: Saladman

In post 555, Datisi wrote:TTTT, are you gonna change your vote back?

In post 556, MaryJoLisa wrote:Come on now, TTTT.
why the rush?

Saladman gave his read 2.5 days ago and the game hasn't progressed since then. Is there reason to think it will suddenly progress now?

Datisi · Post Post #565 (ISO) » Mon Apr 15, 2019 4:25 am

In post 552, MaryJoLisa wrote:
In post 543, Datisi wrote:UNVOTE: Salad
No problem. I still find him scummy though :p
Okay, actually I got there a lot faster than I expected. Everything is pretty well laid out in the material that's been posted already.

I'm good with a salad vote. He's already claimed, he's left his reads list. Are we ready to hammer then?

Is it just me, or did this seem to imply that you've read through everything?

TTTT · Post Post #566 (ISO) » Mon Apr 15, 2019 4:26 am

@Datisi
at this point I think it's you and Nav
or Nav and salad
convince me it's Nav and salad
so I can hammer salad
thx

TTTT · Post Post #567 (ISO) » Mon Apr 15, 2019 4:29 am

In post 562, MaryJoLisa wrote:What's your take on RCEnigma, TTTT?

town-lean but wary
I'm treating him like town until I need to sort him
or one of us gets NK'd

RCEnigma · Post Post #568 (ISO) » Mon Apr 15, 2019 4:29 am

Doubtful this happens tbh.

RCEnigma · Post Post #569 (ISO) » Mon Apr 15, 2019 4:30 am

MJL can we get a readslist before a quick hammer can happen?

MaryJoLisa · Post Post #570 (ISO) » Mon Apr 15, 2019 4:30 am

In post 565, Datisi wrote:
In post 552, MaryJoLisa wrote:
In post 543, Datisi wrote:UNVOTE: Salad
No problem. I still find him scummy though :p
Okay, actually I got there a lot faster than I expected. Everything is pretty well laid out in the material that's been posted already.

I'm good with a salad vote. He's already claimed, he's left his reads list. Are we ready to hammer then?
Is it just me, or did this seem to imply that you've read through everything?

I have read through everything, though it's entirely possible that absorbing +500 posts in half a day may have resulted in nuances being unnoticed, I have, nevertheless, read everything.

Datisi · Post Post #571 (ISO) » Mon Apr 15, 2019 4:31 am

@TTTT, I haven't got much conviction. Maybe I'd be of more help if i understood what you and RCE keep hushing between yourselves, but for what it's worth, RCE is convinced Voted wagon was 1 on 1 off, therefore me and Nav can't both be scum

TTTT · Post Post #572 (ISO) » Mon Apr 15, 2019 4:32 am

In post 571, Datisi wrote:RCE is convinced Voted wagon was 1 on 1 off, therefore me and Nav can't both be scum

yeah but I'm not RCE

MaryJoLisa · Post Post #573 (ISO) » Mon Apr 15, 2019 4:33 am

In post 571, Datisi wrote:@TTTT, I haven't got much conviction. Maybe I'd be of more help if i understood what you and RCE keep hushing between yourselves, but for what it's worth, RCE is convinced Voted wagon was 1 on 1 off, therefore me and Nav can't both be scum

Your conviction isn't as important as your thoughts. And it's totally okay to be flat wrong with these things.

TTTT · Post Post #574 (ISO) » Mon Apr 15, 2019 4:33 am

In post 571, Datisi wrote:Maybe I'd be of more help if i understood what you and RCE keep hushing between yourselves

1. I don't even know if we are talking about the same thing
2. Either way it's anti-town to discuss it (bc scum maybe don't know what I think I might know)