Gameshow Mafia (Reroll): Game Over

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #2250 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:50 pm

8 people need to be in the coalition outside of tmck

OkaPoka · Post Post #2251 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:51 pm

In post 2249, Titus wrote:
In post 2244, OkaPoka wrote:
Why you should not double 1 of 4 anymore

Scum give us 1 of 4 pool which guarantees us at least one scum.

Let's say there is 1 scum and three town. We have a 25% chance of hitting scum here.

If we hit scum, tmck can repick 1of4 and get nightkilled and we gucchi.

If we hit town, tmck repciks 1of4, draws nk.

Scum runs the same pool of 1of4 with 1 scum, 2 town, and one new person.

And we've learned nothing.
I can sheep this. If we do coalition, you agree that my scenarios are all valid? If we have that foundation, we can knock down how they should be drafted.

yes, but im saying for the sake of PoE we should only eliminate until we hit 1 scum in the coalition and then move onto the next coalition.

OkaPoka · Post Post #2252 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:51 pm

But we don't start lynching until we coalition twice.

Action order.

Coalition -> Repick coalition -> Eliminate coalition 1 scum -> Eliminate coalition 2 scum -> 1 of 4

NanceFloor · Post Post #2253 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:52 pm

VOTE: coalition

OkaPoka · Post Post #2254 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:52 pm

pls let everyone check in before we vote coalition

I don't want to risk anything yet.

We have time

Titus · Post Post #2255 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:53 pm

In post 2248, OkaPoka wrote:
Titus you are misunderstanding what I mean

We coalition twice, with two pools of different four.

If we succeed any, we win ok.

If we fail both, then we know both pools have at least "1 scum"

Therefore we should PoE lynch out the coalition pool until we hit the "1 scum" from each pool. Then move to next pool.

This will leave us with 1 scum left, we will have lynched 2 scum in the PoE and 1 scum already.

Then we 1of4 for final PoE. Which guarantees us scum lynch,

I don't see how the final 2 of 4 guarantees a scum lynch as the last scum could be in all the pools. I still think the action order is correct though.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #2256 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:53 pm

ok ok i counterclaim repicker i am the real repicker tmck is confirmed scum

chennisden · Post Post #2257 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:54 pm

In post 2248, OkaPoka wrote:
Titus you are misunderstanding what I mean

We coalition twice, with two pools of different four.

If we succeed any, we win ok.

If we fail both, then we know both pools have at least "1 scum"

Therefore we should PoE lynch out the coalition pool until we hit the "1 scum" from each pool. Then move to next pool.

This will leave us with 1 scum left, we will have lynched 2 scum in the PoE and 1 scum already.

Then we 1of4 for final PoE. Which guarantees us scum lynch,

we need a pool of EIGHT.

NanceFloor · Post Post #2258 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:54 pm

In post 2256, RadiantCowbells wrote:ok ok i counterclaim repicker i am the real repicker tmck is confirmed scum

wait but im the repicker

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #2259 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:54 pm

okapoka must also be scum because he tmid the knowledge that tmck was fake

so we have guilties on okapoka and tmck

gg

chennisden · Post Post #2260 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:54 pm

In post 2256, RadiantCowbells wrote:ok ok i counterclaim repicker i am the real repicker tmck is confirmed scum

are you joking?

OkaPoka · Post Post #2261 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:54 pm

Scum must put a mafia member in 1of4

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #2262 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:54 pm

3 confirmed scum

okapoka nancefloor tmck

ring 'er up

OkaPoka · Post Post #2263 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:54 pm

Please don't troll.

OkaPoka · Post Post #2264 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:55 pm

I am actively avoiding scumhunting.

chennisden · Post Post #2265 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:55 pm

Oka, do you UNDERSTAND what coalition is?

NanceFloor · Post Post #2266 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:55 pm

In post 2262, RadiantCowbells wrote:3 confirmed scum

okapoka nancefloor tmck

ring 'er up

can we concede guys

chennisden · Post Post #2267 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:56 pm

We need to pick a total of NINE people.

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #2268 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:56 pm

good:1of4
Coalition

ok: Treestump
Protect
Arena
Call a Friend
Reveal
Vengeful

awful:
Dance
Popcorn
Quiz
Rank

OkaPoka · Post Post #2269 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:56 pm

In post 2267, chennisden wrote:We need to pick a total of NINE people.

no we need 8 people

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #2270 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:56 pm

actually

veto is pretty good tbh

idk how it didn't make the list

OkaPoka · Post Post #2271 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:57 pm

anyways deadline doesnt carry over so we can spend our time as much as we want

Titus · Post Post #2272 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:57 pm

In post 2259, RadiantCowbells wrote:okapoka must also be scum because he tmid the knowledge that tmck was fake

so we have guilties on okapoka and tmck

gg

Do you feel Oka's plan is bad? Where's the flaw?

OkaPoka · Post Post #2273 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:57 pm

In post 2270, RadiantCowbells wrote:actually

veto is pretty good tbh

idk how it didn't make the list

i feel like i said veto was good for eliminating pools

RadiantCowbells · Post Post #2274 (ISO) » Sun Apr 28, 2019 4:59 pm

In post 2272, Titus wrote:
In post 2259, RadiantCowbells wrote:okapoka must also be scum because he tmid the knowledge that tmck was fake

so we have guilties on okapoka and tmck

gg
Do you feel Oka's plan is bad? Where's the flaw?

i want to win the game with the second coalition and if we're doing first set of people then leftovers you can nearly guarantee that we won't end up with a 3/0 setup